NASA engineers test rotor landing for capsules

October 5, 2012 by Steven Siceloff, NASA

NASA's Johnson Space Center Aerospace Engineer Jeff Hagen attaches a rotor to the top of a model capsule ahead of drop tests inside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Credit: NASA/Kim Shiflett
(—A team of researchers brought a pair of scale model space capsules to the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida to try out a rotor system that could be used in place of parachutes on returning spacecraft.

The design would give a capsule the stability and control of a helicopter, but would not be powered. Instead, the wind passing over the rotors as the capsule descends would make the blades turn, a process called auto-rotation that has been proven repeatedly on helicopters but never tried on spacecraft.

"The purpose of the testing we're doing here is to study how to get the rotor starting to spin," said Jeff Hagen, an engineer at Johnson Space Center in Houston. "We're trying to build as much of that story as we can."

With team members spread out at different levels of the VAB, Jim Meehan stood at the 16th level of the cavernous VAB, about halfway up to where the two-pound model capsule hung on a line 480 feet above the concrete floor. Holding a helicopter radio-control unit, he remotely changed the rotors' pitch and slowed the fall four times as the unpowered craft landed on a stack of foam.

"It's like running four separate tests in one drop," said Meehan, an engineer at Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala.

The intent is to give real spacecraft a soft landing with enough control that they could touch down anywhere in the world, whether it be a runway or the top of a building. In other words, wherever a helicopter could land, a spacecraft could land, too.

A model capsule seen ahead of drop tests inside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida to test a rotor system landing design. Credit: : NASA/Kim Shiflett
"You can land gently and you can land where you want, you don't have to land out in the ocean," Meehan said. "Compared to a parachute, you get a soft landing and you get a targeted landing."

The rotor concept also fits nicely with spent , Hagen said. Instead of throwing away the stage and its valuable engines, rotors could be built into the booster frame and unfurled as the stage descends to Earth. Just as with the capsule, the stage would be controllable the whole way down and would land softly to save the all-important engines.

One might think the blades would fold up like an umbrella on a windy day the moment they touch the airstream around the capsule, but Hagen said the airflow around the hinges would be balanced, so the blades would hold strong.

The researchers note that their work is about incorporating different elements together into something that is innovative.

"A hundred years ago, there were cameras and there were phones and there were wireless devices to send Morse code and they were all separate technologies on their own," said Les Boatright, an engineer at Kennedy. "Now you have a telephone that does all three of those things and it's a merger of technology. Well, this is taking the capsule entry technology and helicopter rotor technology and merging those in an innovative way to make something that didn't exist before out of two things that did exist before."

The development team also notes that some bombs have fins that flick open safely at high speed. The returning spacecraft could use a mechanism similar to the fins, with the difference being that the capsule's blades would start spinning almost immediately after opening. Control fins would open on the side of the capsule, too, to keep it from revolving with the blades.

According to the engineers, the testing is extremely simple compared to the high-tech evaluations that must be done before such an experimental system could be flown into space, but the analysis is critical to moving through the early phases of development to convince people it's an idea worth pursuing.

The idea is not all that new. In fact, NASA researched the concept for the Apollo capsules but opted for the parachute return for the sake of shortening development time during the moon race.

Testing of the concept will get more demanding over time, including the possibility of hauling a roto-capsule miles into the sky on a high-altitude balloon for release. And before are entrusted with the lives of astronauts, designers expect to try them out on a small capsule returning fragile science samples from the International Space Station.

For that task, which at this point cannot be done by another spacecraft since the retirement of the space shuttle, the roto-capsule could find a successful niche pretty quickly, researchers said.

"That's kind of a big leap from something that's a small test article to something that's on a manned system, but in between you could have something that's a small-scale sample return that's cargo only," Hagen said.

Explore further: Image: Boeing tests parachute system for CST-100 spacecraft

Related Stories

Image: Boeing tests parachute system for CST-100 spacecraft

May 9, 2012

The main parachutes deploy for Boeing's crew capsule during a parachute drop test on May 2, 2012. This is the second successful parachute drop test for its Crew Space Transportation (CST) spacecraft, part of Boeing's effort ...

Drop test for Orion crew capsule's new parachutes

April 11, 2012

NASA successfully conducted a drop test of the Orion crew vehicle’s entry, descent and landing parachutes in preparation for the vehicle’s first orbital flight test, currently scheduled for 2014. Orion is the crew ...

Orion spaceship set for new tests in Colorado

August 12, 2011

(AP) -- A spaceship that could carry the next wave of astronauts to an asteroid or beyond is being prepared for a new round of tests at a Lockheed Martin facility near Denver.

NASA Prepares for Return of Interstellar Cargo

December 21, 2005

NASA's Stardust mission is nearing Earth after a 2.88 billion mile round-trip journey to return cometary and interstellar dust particles back to Earth. Scientists believe the cargo will help provide answers to fundamental ...

Recommended for you

How hot are atoms in the shock wave of an exploding star?

January 21, 2019

A new method to measure the temperature of atoms during the explosive death of a star will help scientists understand the shock wave that occurs as a result of this supernova explosion. An international team of researchers, ...

New eclipsing cataclysmic variable discovered

January 21, 2019

Using the Mobile Astronomical System of Telescope-Robots (MASTER), an international team of astronomers has detected a new eclipsing cataclysmic variable. The newfound object, designated MASTER OT J061451.70–272535.5, is ...

The disintegrating exoplanet K2-22b

January 21, 2019

Exoplanet surveys have yielded many surprises over the years, and the discovery of "disintegrating" exoplanets was one of them. These are planets that produce asymmetric shapes in the dips of the light curves seen as they ...

Total lunar eclipse woos sky watchers

January 21, 2019

An unusual set of celestial circumstances came together over Sunday night and the wee hours of Monday for sky watchers in Europe, Africa and the Americas, where the moon was fully obscured before lighting up again with a ...

Making stars when the universe was half its age

January 18, 2019

The universe is about 13.8 billion years old, and its stars are arguably its most momentous handiwork. Astronomers studying the intricacies of star formation across cosmic time are trying to understand whether stars and the ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Oct 05, 2012
There are a few small problems with this rotor concept. For a return capsule, it is apparrent that the length of the rotor blades will greatly exceed the compact dimensions of the capsule. Packaging them for launch is going to be hell, not to mention the weight in comparison to compact-able parachute(s. For reusable rocket boosters on the comparable sizes with the SRBs on the Space Shuttle, unless the motor nozzles are hardened for landing impacts and debris, the hub point of the rotors should be near the noozle end (to maximize the rotor blades' length). This will entail tricky over turning and unfolding rotors sequences at supersonic speeds. Not to mention they do not indicate how they are going to keep the SRBs stay upright or stable after landing, without falling over and throwing head-decapitating blades all over the place!
1 / 5 (1) Oct 06, 2012
While there are a few small problems, this looks like an improvement, especially starting for non-human spacecraft returns.

The article does say that the blades could be packeged into a booster rocket which would avoid the "blades will ... exceed the ... dimensions of the capsule."
not rated yet Oct 06, 2012
would make the blades turn, a process called auto-rotation that has been proven repeatedly on helicopters but never tried on spacecraft.

Actually the term for that sort of craft is a gyrocopter (or autogyro) - not a helicopter.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.