Environmentalists warn of risks of Arctic drilling

Environmentalists warn of risks of Arctic drilling
Greenpeace International executive director Kumi Naidoo, right, and Greenpeace Russian energy researcher Vladimir Chuprov, left, speak at a news conference in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012. Greenpeace and the World Wide Fund for Nature unveiled a report on Tuesday they have commissioned to assess risks of an oil spill in the Pechora Sea in Russia’s Arctic where state-owned Gazprom is currently prospecting for oil. (AP Photo/Misha Japaridze)

(AP) — Environmental activists warned Tuesday that drilling for oil in the Russian Arctic could have disastrous consequences because of a lack of technology and infrastructure to deal with a possible spill in a remote region with massive icebergs and heavy storms.

Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund unveiled a report assessing the risks of an oil spill in the Pechora Sea in Russia's Arctic, where state-owned Gazprom has installed a huge platform and is pioneering sea drilling in the area at its Prirazlomnaya platform.

The report concludes that a sizeable spill from the platform could contaminate protected areas and nature reserves on the shore and islands within about 20 hours after a spill, while emergency teams would take at least three days to reach the area. The platform is about 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) from the nearest port, which is in Murmansk, a city on the extreme northwestern edge of the Russian mainland.

The report was commissioned by the two environmental organizations and compiled by an independent Moscow-based think tank.

"An oil spill in the Arctic would be virtually impossible to clean up," Greenpeace International's director, Kumi Naidoo, told a news conference.

An oil spill that releases 10,000 metric tons of oil over five days would contaminate half a million square kilometers (about 300,000 square miles) of water, the report said.

Gazprom disputed the report's assessment of the risks involved and said it is committed to safety.

Its offshore drilling subsidiary told The Associated Press in an email that the platform's design "incorporated the latest technology in offshore oil drilling" and "more than" satisfied all environmental and safety standards.

The company also said it collaborates with Russian oil company Lukoil, which has a base in the coastal town of Varrandei, 60 kilometers (37 miles) south of Gazprom's oil deposit, which, if necessary, could speed up any rescue efforts significantly.

Environmentalists also insist that oil production in the Arctic is unprofitable and cannot survive without government subsidies.

"Oil companies would not be rushing to the Arctic so eagerly if it wasn't for politicians who push them to," Igor Chestin, head of WWF in Russia, said Tuesday.

Russian oil companies have only recently begun to operate in weather conditions as harsh as those found in the ice-bound Arctic, where ice ridges are meters (yards) deep and storms are frequent.

Gazprom is pioneering the oil development of Russia's sector of the and was the first Russian company to dispatch a drilling rig to the Pechora Sea in northwest Russia last year. The oil field they are prospecting holds some 6.6 million tons of oil.

Environmentalists argue that Artic drilling is a hazard that mankind cannot afford since there are no tried and tested technologies to deal with in conditions with ice — under ice in particular.

An AP investigation last year found that at least 1 percent of Russia's annual production, or 5 million tons, is spilled every year. Crumbling infrastructure and a harsh climate are believed to be the main factors for the spills.


Explore further

Oil spilled in Russian Arctic

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Citation: Environmentalists warn of risks of Arctic drilling (2012, August 14) retrieved 26 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2012-08-environmentalists-arctic-drilling.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 14, 2012
The arctic has survived 3km thick glaciers, mega-floods, lava flows and meteor strikes. Nothing man does will long remain.

All the jawing are either people looking for a paycheck, or people who just hate people. Environmentalism is rarely about the environment; it is about control of the means of production.

Aug 14, 2012
The arctic has survived 3km thick glaciers, mega-floods, lava flows and meteor strikes. Nothing man does will long remain.

All the jawing are either people looking for a paycheck, or people who just hate people. Environmentalism is rarely about the environment; it is about control of the means of production.


So what? All of these natural processes are of a physically lethal variety, but don't --like petroleum-- leave a lasting, environmental poison to kill and sicken marine and shore life for extended periods post-spill.

And, any and all claims to "meeting or exceeding" environmental standards and response preparedness are pure bunk, as we were again made aware in the wake of Deepwater Horizon.

As was pointed out, the ability to contain and clean up a spill, which is incredibly difficult under even the most ideal conditions, will be virtually impossible in the Arctic, regardless of the time of year.

Aug 15, 2012
As was pointed out, the ability to contain and clean up a spill, which is incredibly difficult under even the most ideal conditions, will be virtually impossible in the Arctic, regardless of the time of year.


Also given the track record of drillers and the conditions that the employees would have to live in, a major accident is inevitable!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more