UN: Canada still obliged to fight climate change

Christiana Figueres
The UN climate chief on Tuesday voiced regret over Canada's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol and said that the country still had legal obligations to work against global warming. Christiana Figueres, pictured in February 2011, also expressed surprise that Canada chose to announce its decision just after more than 190 countries reached a hard-fought accord in Durban, South Africa.

The UN climate chief on Tuesday voiced regret over Canada's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol and said that the country still had legal obligations to work against global warming.

Christiana Figueres, head of the UN Framework Convention on , also expressed surprise that Canada chose to announce its decision just after more than 190 countries reached a hard-fought accord in Durban, South Africa.

"I regret that Canada has announced it will withdraw and am surprised over its timing," Figueres said in a statement.

"Whether or not Canada is a party to the , it has a under the Convention to reduce its emissions, and a to itself and future generations to lead in the global effort," she said.

"Industrialized countries whose emissions have risen significantly since 1990, as is the case for Canada, remain in a weaker position to call on developing countries to limit their emissions," she said.

Canada on Monday became the first country formally to quit the landmark Kyoto Protocol as it sought to avoid paying penalties of up to CAN$14 billion (US$13.6 billion) for missing targets on cutting .

But Canada, like virtually all countries, remains part of the UN -- set up by the 1992 Rio Earth Summit which called in broad terms for global action against human-caused global warming.

The Kyoto Protocol, reached in 1997 after marathon talks in Japan's ancient capital, requires only wealthy nations to cut emissions blamed for climate change.

Canada joins the United States as the only major industrial nation to shun Kyoto. US president George W. Bush rejected the treaty as one of his first acts in office, calling it unfair.

"Canada is obviously a sovereign country and can make its own decision," Todd Stern, the US envoy for , told reporters on a conference call when asked about the move.

"The US, as you all know, is not in Kyoto, so it's not something certainly that we're going to criticize or take a position on," he said.

But Stern said he doubted the impact of Canada's decision, noting that the European Union is the only major player that has signed on to an extension of Kyoto whose obligations were scheduled to run out at the end of 2012.

The Europeans offered the new round of Kyoto pledges on emission cuts in a bid to encourage developing countries to sign on to the Durban agreement, which calls for the first climate treaty covering the whole world by 2015.

"I think Kyoto, it's fair to say, is more the past than the future," Stern said.

"If the discussion is what's going to be in a new regime that includes everybody, that's got developed and in and how that's going to get structured, I don't actually think that Canada being in or out of Kyoto is going to really have a big effect," Stern said.

A number of other countries criticized Canada including France, which called the decision "bad news for the fight against climate change," and China, which urged Canada to "face up to its responsibilities and obligations."


Explore further

Canada withdrawal from Kyoto is 'bad news': France

(c) 2011 AFP

Citation: UN: Canada still obliged to fight climate change (2011, December 13) retrieved 23 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2011-12-canada-obliged-climate.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 13, 2011
Christiana Figueres looks evil!

Dec 14, 2011
Tonight there are reports of last ditch efforts to save the crooks. It won't work:

http://noconsensu...nt-62756

Earlier today NASA belatedly started asking questions, . . .

Giving $1.4 M to Washington University to confirm or deny reports that silicon carbide (SiC) grains in the Murchison meteorite are "fall-out" particles from the supernova explosion that made our elements.

That question was answered 15 years ago by Kuroda and Myers using data from Washington University, but NASA, the US NAS, the UK's RS, and the UN's IPCC apparently didn't want anyone to know that Earth's heat source - the Sun - is not stable as they claimed, but the violently unstable remains of a supernova that gave birth to the Solar Syatem five billion (5 Gyr) ago.

Here's the rest of the story with links to data and observations:

http://dl.dropbox...asks.pdf

With deep regrets,
Oliver K. Manuel
www.omatumr.com/

Dec 15, 2011
Christiana Figueres looks evil!


Here's the rest of the story:

"Fear not, the Universe is in good hands!"

http://dl.dropbox..._Not.pdf

Although Big Brother is scared, crazy, and out of control:

1. Scared:
http://joannenova...idation/

http://judithcurr...t-149143

http://noconsensu...nt-62436

2. Crazy; May seize totalitarian control:

www.infowars.com/...itizens/

3. Out of control, like a "Delinquent Teenager"

www.amazon.com/De...p;sr=1-1

Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09

Dec 15, 2011
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more