Frankenstein's moon: Astronomers vindicate account of masterwork

September 27, 2011 by Jayme Blaschke
This vintage postcard from circa 1900 shows Villa Diodati (the white house with the orange roof, just left of center) on a steep slope overlooking Lake Geneva. This location allows relatively clear views to the west, but the eastern sky is partially blocked by the hill. (From the collection of Donald Olson)

Victor Frankenstein’s infamous monster led a brief, tragic existence, blazing a trail of death and destruction that prompted mobs of angry villagers to take up torches and pitchforks against him on the silver screen. Never once during his rampage, however, did the monster question the honesty of his ultimate creator, author Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley.

That bit of horror was left to the scholars.

Now, a team of astronomers from Texas State University-San Marcos has applied its unique brand of celestial sleuthing to a long-simmering controversy surrounding the events that inspired Shelley to write her legendary novel Frankenstein. Their results shed new light on the question of whether or not Shelley’s account of the episode is merely a romantic fiction.

Texas State physics faculty members Donald Olson and Russell Doescher, English professor Marilynn S. Olson and Honors Program students Ava G. Pope and Kelly D. Schnarr publish their findings in the November 2011 edition of Sky & Telescope magazine, on newsstands now.

“Shelley gave a very detailed account of that summer in the introduction to an early edition of Frankenstein, but was she telling the truth?” Olson said. “Was she honest when she told her story of that summer and how she came up with the idea, and the sequence of events?”

A Dark and Stormy Night

The story begins, literally, in June 1816 at Villa Diodati overlooking Switzerland’s Lake Geneva. Here, on a dark and stormy night, Shelley—merely 18 at the time—attended a gathering with her future husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley, her stepsister Claire Clairmont, Lord Byron and John Polidori. To pass the time, the group read a volume of ghost stories aloud, at which point Byron posed a challenge in which each member of the group would attempt to write such a tale.

“The chronology that’s in most books says Byron suggested they come up with ghost stories on June 16, and by June 17 she’s writing a scary story,” Olson said. “But Shelley has a very definite memory of several days passing where she couldn’t come up with an idea. If this chronology is correct, then she embellished and maybe fabricated her account of how it all happened.

“There’s another, different version of the chronology in which Byron makes his suggestion on June 16, and Shelley didn’t come up with her idea until June 22, which gives a gap of five or six days for conceiving a story,” he said. “But our calculations show that can’t be right, because there wouldn’t be any moonlight on the night that she says the moon was shining.”

Moonlight is the key. In Shelley’s account, she was unable to come up with a suitable idea until another late-night conversation—a philosophical discussion of the nature of life—that continued past the witching hour (midnight). When she finally went to bed, she experienced a terrifying waking dream in which a man attempted to bring life to a cadaverous figure via the engines of science. Shelley awoke from the horrific vision to find moonlight streaming in through her window, and by the next day was hard at work on her story.

Doubting Shelley

Although the original gathering and ghost story challenge issued by Byron is well-documented, academic scholars and researchers have questioned the accuracy of Mary Shelley’s version of events to the extent of labeling them outright fabrications. The traditionally accepted date for the ghost story challenge is June 16, based on an entry from Polidori’s diary, which indicates the entire party had gathered at Villa Diodati that night. In Polidori’s entry for June 17, however, he reports “The ghost-stories are begun by all but me.”

Critics have used those diary entries to argue Shelley didn’t agonize over her story for days before beginning it, but rather started within a span of hours. Others have suggested Shelley fabricated a romanticized version for the preface of the 1831 edition of Frankenstein solely to sell more books. Key, however, is the fact that none of Polidori’s entries make reference to Byron’s ghost story proposal.

“There is no explicit mention of a date for the ghost story suggestion in any of the primary sources–the letters, the documents, the diaries, things like that,” Olson said. “Nobody knows that date, despite the assumption that it happened on the 16th.”

Frankenstein’s moon

Surviving letters and journals establish that Byron and Polidori arrived at Villa Diodati on June 10, narrowing the possible dates for the evening of Byron’s ghost story proposition to a June 10-16 window. To further refine the dates, Shelley’s reference of moonlight on the night of her inspirational dream provided an astronomical clue for the Texas State researchers. To determine which nights in June 1816 bright moonlight could’ve shone through Shelley’s window after midnight, the team of Texas State researchers traveled in Aug. 2010 to Switzerland, where Villa Diodati still stands above Lake Geneva.

The research team made extensive topographic measurements of the terrain and Villa Diodati, then combed through weather records from June of 1816. The Texas State researchers then calculated that a bright, gibbous would have cleared the hillside to shine into Shelley’s bedroom window just before 2 a.m. on June 16. This calculated time is in agreement with Shelley’s witching hour reference. Furthermore, a Polidori diary entry backs up Shelley’s claim of a late-night philosophical “conversation about principles” of life taking place June 15.

Had there been no moonlight visible that night, the astronomical analysis would indicate fabrication on her part. Instead, evidence supports Byron’s ghost story suggestion taking place June 10-13 and Shelley’s waking dream occurring between 2 a.m. and 3 a.m. on June 16, 1816.

“Mary Shelley wrote about moonlight shining through her window, and for 15 years I wondered if we could recreate that night,” Olson said. “We did recreate it. We see no reason to doubt her account, based on what we see in the primary sources and using the astronomical clue.”

Explore further: The kids are alright

More information: For additional information, visit the Sky & Telescope web gallery at

Related Stories

The kids are alright

May 26, 2011

Children should be seen and not heard... who says? A Philosophy academic at The University of Nottingham is challenging the adage by teaching primary school children to argue properly.

One year of the moon in 2.5 minutes

June 15, 2011

We don’t always have the time or ability to see the Moon every night of the year, but this video, from the Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio, uses data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ...

June lyrid meteor shower underway

June 15, 2011

Although there’s more than enough Moon to go around right now, while you’re waiting on the eclipse, you just might want to see if you can spot a few stray meteors belonging to the June Lyrids. Thanks to John Chumack, ...

Recommended for you

Solar minimum surprisingly constant

November 17, 2017

Using more than a half-century of observations, Japanese astronomers have discovered that the microwaves coming from the sun at the minimums of the past five solar cycles have been the same each time, despite large differences ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (6) Sep 27, 2011
Read the whole article.

No clue why anyone should care, nor why anyone would spend 15 years researching this.

Government grants?

Doesn't the world have more important things to spend time and money on?
1 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
I agree ... it's a waste of cyberspace.
5 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
At least it gave me the idea to read Frankenstein this fall. Never read it.
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 27, 2011
I heard awhile back that the developers of Microsoft Excel had inserted a special key sequence that entered into a 3D back end that allow you to fly through an entire 3D vista. I was looking at this intricate rendition of a flying carpet and my first overwhelming response to it was the same thing I had on reading this article.

Some people have WAY too much time on their hands.

On the other hand, some people collect old license plates.
1 / 5 (6) Sep 27, 2011
Thanks for an intriguing story!

The link of lunacy and lunar cycles is easily documented by talking with those who work in hospitals and jails.

Our aversion to astrology caused the scientific community to ignore or deny links of celestial objects with events on Earth - without careful consideration.

Ignoring the Sun's influence on Earth's changing climate [1-4] is the foundation of the current climate scandal that discredited many important scientific institutions.

1. Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate, JFE 21, 193-198 (2002):

2. Earth's Heat Source - The Sun, E&E 20, 131-144 (2009)

3. Origin and Evolution of Life, JME 2, 587-594 (2011)

4. "Neutron Repulsion", Apeiron J in press (2011)

Thanks again,
Oliver K. Manuel
1 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
5 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
No clue why anyone should care, nor why anyone would spend 15 years researching this.

Hey, there are people who have been doing research on fictional (religious) texts for thousands of years.
Compared to that this is (almost) time well spent.


Couldn't have said it better.
5 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2011
Thanks again,
Oliver K. Manuel

I had no idea neutron repulsion caused her to write Frankenstein, thanks Oliver.
5 / 5 (2) Sep 28, 2011
it's not all bits and bites and rockets to the moon,this is the science version of a pick-up B-ball gives students a chance to work out programs and learn to use scientific like this has been done on everything from the painting "the scream" to the rainbow at Yosemite far as who cares i'm sure we all have a long list of those.
not rated yet Sep 28, 2011
did olver just claim lunar cycles and human behavior are linked and that we ignore astrology being connected to actual science?
not rated yet Sep 28, 2011
We can infer that he links Shelley to lunacy, and her occupation to healthcare or corrections, not writer.
not rated yet Sep 29, 2011
There is some haziness in the account and I've not studied it but it seems to me they were probably discussing scary stories over the days preceding Byron's challenge. Shelley might have struggled then to come up with some ideas. But it was only after the challenge that she had that nightmare and came up with the Frankenstein idea.

Moments in history of creative inspiration, apple - gravity, bathwater - Eureka, and the historical details (or even conjecture where there is no certainty) are interesting to many of us. I care.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.