The new opinion makers

July 4, 2011 by Andrew Jaspan, University of Technology, Sydney

( -- Shorter deadlines and fewer staff are pushing traditional news outlets to publish increasingly superficial stories. Andrew Jaspan, Editor of the new media channel The Conversation, explains how academia is filling the void and providing the public with context and understanding about the issues affecting us all.

The media is in a state of crisis. Declining revenues are dragging down the quality and integrity of content on our TV, on radio and in newspapers. They’re vital for an informed democracy, but as jobs in newsrooms are cut, coverage is increasingly superficial and reliant on wire copy, press releases and celebrity gossip. The vacuum in the public debate is stark; people are hungry for information they can trust.

Journalists are very good at locating and highlighting problems. Yet they fall down when it comes to producing solutions. And rightly so; that isn’t their primary role.

The journalist is usually a jack-of-all-trades and master of none. He or she needs to be adaptable, ready to be sent to any story and come back with the basic facts. For deeper analysis and the development of ideas that can take matters forward, experts are required.

Where do we find them? In universities and research institutes. Here are the people with the knowledge, and crucially, the inclination and ability to look forward and develop proposals and solutions. Here lie the answers to society’s most complex problems.

As public servants, academics have a duty to transfer knowledge and use their expertise to improve public policy and debate. It’s all very well working for years on a crucial medical breakthrough, or crunching the numbers to find out how big the Australian population can be before we reach breaking point, but if no-one (bar a few academic colleagues) reads about the research, that vital contribution is lost.

For too long the academic and media worlds have been at odds. Journalists are increasingly forced to be superficial and keen to put a sexy headline on their story to drive circulation and hits, while academics can spend years in their ivory tower drowning under a sea of books, disconnected from the real world.

Those clichés should be long gone; the two worlds have collided. Just as the media is pushing the boundaries of technology and bringing news from parts of the world that simply couldn’t be reached before, academics are increasingly engaging with the commercial world, policy makers and the public.

There are more opportunities now for academics to influence public debate. Television and stations are multiplying while the internet is ideal for people to disseminate and engage with information.

But people don’t want just any old information. In fact, most report feeling overwhelmed by the amount of information available to them. The public want timely facts delivered in a fashion they can absorb and most of all, especially in an era of Photoshop and blogging, information that they can trust. This is the holy grail of the new ‘over-information age’.

We need the deeply informed knowledge gathered and nurtured by people of strong expertise in their given field. The key is to make it easier not only for those academic experts to pass on their knowledge, but for the interested wider public to access it.

That’s why we launched The Conversation. We believe the higher education sector’s contribution to public debate is vital. And forward-thinking universities like UTS, which is a founding partner of The Conversation, are committed to improving the public debate.

Yet sometimes universities and individual academics need help to communicate the often-dazzling work they do. There is so much valuable work going on within the walls of these institutions that even the best-resourced public relations department could only hope to scratch the surface. We want to work with them to help get that essential information out to the public.

Our professional journalists and editors work alongside the academic authors to help them translate their in-depth knowledge to the public, because just as journalists shouldn’t be doing the job of experts, it’s not the role of the academic to do the job of the professional media editor.

Since we launched in March, we’ve been overwhelmed by the positive feedback from the academic community as well as those informed members of the public who feel they’ve been abandoned by the traditional .

People are interested in research and the findings, but they are also interested in the expertise those researchers have. As ‘subject-matter specialists’, academics are also, with our help, able to respond quickly and with real knowledge on live news. So when a major world event takes place – like the killing of Osama bin Laden – the public naturally want to know what happened, and more importantly what it means, from somebody who knows what they’re talking about.

Academics are all too often shy about their work. Some think their research isn’t worthy of a spot on the news, some worry promoting their research as egotistical and others are, rightly, simply too busy. With the pressure of grant applications, teaching, administration and bureaucracy weighing down, I can’t blame them.

But academics can make a difference. They can change the course of public debate by providing the proper context and understanding to a subject.

To academics we say: whenever you hear a politician making an ill-informed remark, jump on it. When you see a product promising to change someone’s life, when all it’s going to do is relieve them of their hard-earned cash, act on it. Use your skills and expertise to fill that gap between the public and the decision makers. Your research can make a real impact for the good of the community.

Explore further: Study asks 'Are foreign correspondents redundant?'

Related Stories

Study asks 'Are foreign correspondents redundant?'

December 9, 2010

Economic pressures and digital technology are undermining the role of the foreign correspondent, according to a new Oxford University study. Among its recommendations, it says news organizations need to ‘rethink their ...

Mobile phones 'to revolutionise news coverage'

February 3, 2011

Mobile phones are set to dramatically shake up the global news industry, as cellphones increasingly become a basic consumer essential and users upgrade their handsets with greater frequency.

Critical thinking called into question

February 4, 2011

A post-secondary education won’t necessarily guarantee students the critical thinking skills employers have come to expect from university grads, says a recent study.

Trust not always a good thing

December 7, 2010

Citizen groups acting as consultants to industry would do well to hold onto a little healthy mistrust to keep debate and critical thinking alive, says a University of Alberta researcher.

Exploding the ivory tower myth

May 17, 2011

When people think about how academia links with external organisations they often think in terms of commercialisation of research. But the results of a large-scale survey of academics across all disciplines in every UK university, ...

Recommended for you

Unprecedented study of Picasso's bronzes uncovers new details

February 17, 2018

Musee national Picasso-Paris and the Northwestern University/Art Institute of Chicago Center for Scientific Studies in the Arts (NU-ACCESS) have completed the first major material survey and study of the Musee national Picasso-Paris' ...

Humans will actually react pretty well to news of alien life

February 16, 2018

As humans reach out technologically to see if there are other life forms in the universe, one important question needs to be answered: When we make contact, how are we going to handle it? Will we feel threatened and react ...

Using Twitter to discover how language changes

February 16, 2018

Scientists at Royal Holloway, University of London, have studied more than 200 million Twitter messages to try and unravel the mystery of how language evolves and spreads.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 04, 2011
Academe excretes journalists, as waste product or dross bagasse. Unfortunately the conspirators of ignorance gobble the product as uncritically as Soylent Green.

Believe nothing that you read or hear without verifying it yourself unless it fits your preexisting worldview (this latter clause to excuse the invincibly ignorant like F. Sherbert).
not rated yet Jul 04, 2011
Think tanks have long replaced journalists (and educators) as the prime source of 'thought'. Those with the money feed the think tanks. Think tanks are the 'educational' tools of the rich and the economically driven, which in most cases are the same.
not rated yet Jul 05, 2011
Your 'thought' (scare quotes?) affirms the antecedent. Which is to say that you are correct only if what a tank does is your 'thought'. Think tanks may propagandize the economically driven rich, do you envy that?

Good people ought to be armed as they will, with wits and Guns and the Truth. A is A

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.