Universal, primordial magnetic fields discovered in deep space

September 21, 2010
Universal, primordial magnetic fields discovered in deep space
NASA artist's conception of an "active galactic nucleus"

Scientists from the California Institute of Technology and UCLA have discovered evidence of "universal ubiquitous magnetic fields" that have permeated deep space between galaxies since the time of the Big Bang.

Caltech physicist Shin'ichiro Ando and Alexander Kusenko, a professor of physics and astronomy at UCLA, report the discovery in a paper to be published in an upcoming issue of ; the research is currently available online.

Ando and Kusenko studied images of the most powerful objects in the universe -- supermassive that emit high-energy radiation as they devour stars in distant — obtained by NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray .

"We found the signs of primordial magnetic fields in deep space between galaxies," Ando said.

Physicists have hypothesized for many years that a universal should permeate deep space between galaxies, but there was no way to observe it or measure it until now.

The physicists produced a composite image of 170 giant black holes and discovered that the images were not as sharp as expected.

"Because space is filled with left over from the Big Bang, as well as emitted from galaxies, high-energy photons emitted by a distant source can interact with the background photons and convert into electron-positron pairs, which interact in their turn and convert back into a group of photons somewhat later," said Kusenko, who is also a senior scientist at the University of Tokyo's Institute for Physics and Mathematics of the Universe.

"While this process by itself does not blur the image significantly, even a small magnetic field along the way can deflect the electrons and positrons, making the image fuzzy," he said.

From such blurred images, the researchers found that the average magnetic field had a "femto-Gauss" strength, just one-quadrillionth of the Earth's magnetic field. The universal magnetic fields may have formed in the early universe shortly after the Big Bang, long before stars and galaxies formed, Ando and Kusenko said.

Explore further: Cosmic accelerators discovered in our galaxy by UCLA physicists, Japanese colleague

Related Stories

Astronomers peer back to 'dawn of galaxies'

October 1, 2004

Detailed analysis of Hubble Space Telescope images has allowed astronomers to determine a major event in the evolution of the universe. The astronomers used the Hubble Space Telescope’s Ultra Deep Field (UDF) to peer 95 ...

'Big baby' galaxy found in newborn Universe

September 28, 2005

The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope have teamed up to 'weigh' the stars in distant galaxies. One of these galaxies is not only one of the most distant ever seen, but it appears to be unusually ...

Science with Integral -- 5 years on

October 17, 2007

With eyes that peer into the most energetic phenomena in the universe, ESA’s Integral has been setting records, discovering the unexpected and helping understanding the unknown over its first five years.

Hubble, Spitzer find 'Lego-block' galaxies in early universe

September 6, 2007

The conventional model for galaxy evolution predicts that small galaxies in the early Universe evolved into the massive galaxies of today by coalescing. Nine Lego-like “building block” galaxies initially detected by Hubble ...

Recommended for you

Tracing aromatic molecules in the early universe

March 22, 2017

A molecule found in car engine exhaust fumes that is thought to have contributed to the origin of life on Earth has made astronomers heavily underestimate the amount of stars that were forming in the early Universe, a University ...

Sand flow theory could explain water-like streaks on Mars

March 22, 2017

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers from France and the Slovak Republic has proposed a theory to explain the water-like streaks that appear seasonally on the surface of Mars, which do not involve water. In their paper published ...

Ice in Ceres' shadowed craters linked to tilt history

March 22, 2017

Dwarf planet Ceres may be hundreds of millions of miles from Jupiter, and even farther from Saturn, but the tremendous influence of gravity from these gas giants has an appreciable effect on Ceres' orientation. In a new study, ...

Giant magnetic fields in the universe

March 22, 2017

Astronomers from Bonn and Tautenburg in Thuringia (Germany) used the 100-m radio telescope at Effelsberg to observe several galaxy clusters. At the edges of these large accumulations of dark matter, stellar systems (galaxies), ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.4 / 5 (5) Sep 21, 2010
Whenever we see electric charges move about, there's a magnetic field. Sun's surface, Earth's poles, Jupiter's and Saturn's fields, the fields in galaxy clusters, anywhere we look, there's magnetism. Now, it would be inconceivable that the Big Bang (and the early times after it) didn't cause a massive magnetic field.

Now, of course, it would be incredibly diluted, but it should still exist. It will be very interesting to see what kinds of experiments scientists can create with this new knowledge.
5 / 5 (3) Sep 21, 2010
Link to the research: http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.1924
not rated yet Sep 21, 2010
Something to do with the non-zero vaccuum energy perhaps?
1 / 5 (1) Sep 21, 2010
i made such a conjecture in a recent comment on the site and that was considered by the editor as mere verbal garbage! i pointed out that the primordial magnetic field must have originated as first charges got generated following Big Bang. The very process of generation follows created charged bodies with intrinsic rotational mode, a sort of recoil!
not rated yet Sep 22, 2010
Could this magnetic field have caused the primary disruptions in the early stages of the universe that resulted in non-uniformity? I mean, would magnetism cause primordial instabilities that would cause gas clouds to develop\collapse in different ways?
not rated yet Sep 22, 2010
"The physicists produced a composite image of 170 giant black holes and discovered that the images were not as sharp as expected."

I like this. Why not post the blurred composite image of the black holes, instead of the stock picture above? ;)
5 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2010
"Why not post the blurred composite image of the black holes..."

Check out the paper(link above), Fig 1 [pg 11].
1 / 5 (1) Sep 24, 2010
Would not the black holes themselves and the galaxies circling them produce a magnetic field, much like our own sun produces the solar magnetic field that could distort the images instead of this being a remnant of the big bang? Or is the consistency of the distortion enough to rule out that effect?
1 / 5 (2) Sep 25, 2010
i made such a conjecture in a recent comment on the site and that was considered by the editor as mere verbal garbage!

I too have been stung by what appears to be some sort of moderator witch hunt. Starting to sound more and more like a bad moderator on board.

Interestingly, since energy produces the magnetism, does a mapping of said fields correlate with known areas of dark matter?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.