Estimate of flowering plant species to be cut by 600,000

September 23, 2010 by Lin Edwards, report

The Orange Blossom, Citrus sinensis
( -- Scientists from the UK, US and elsewhere have been carrying out a comprehensive assessment of flowering plants and adjusting the estimate of their total number. The new estimate is that there are about 400,000 flowering plant species, with over 600,000 to be deleted from the list as duplicate names.

Botanists around the world have been collecting, naming, and classifying plants for centuries, and as a result many plants have inadvertently been named several times, giving rise to a list of over one million flowering . Some plants were given different names because of slight differences when grown in different climates, while others were named by scientists unaware the plant had already been described and named.

Scientists have known for a long time that the databases contained many duplicates, but until now no one has been certain of how many because the information has been contained in several databases around the world. Now, for the first time, a single working list of all flowering plant species has been created, and it has been made possible by an automated rule-based system.

The three-year-long project to create "The Plant List" was the result of a request from the Convention on at their 2002 meeting. The major concern was that without this work being done it would be impossible to be sure how many plant species were endangered or how successful were conservation efforts.

Assistant Keeper Alan Paton of the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew in London, which was a leading contributor to the project, explained that the work is also important for people dealing with economically important plants. He said many plants had two or three names, but the economically useful plants, such as food plants, often had many more names because they tend to be more widely used. The duplication meant that researchers would miss a great deal of information on a plant if they were only looking for one name.

Working with other groups, such as the Missouri Botanical Garden in St. Louis in the US, botanists have searched the various plant databases and attempted to reach a consensus on an accepted name for each plant, which is then listed along with all known variations. Where there were conflicts they preferred global sources to local, and later sources to earlier.

So far in the current draft, there are 301,000 accepted species with 480,000 alternative names, but there are some 240,000 left to be assessed. Paton said he believed the true number of known plant species will be just over 400,000. The final listing should be available by the end of this year, but the current draft has already been used to help choose the species to be included in the Red List Index for Plants, which is a list of plants threatened with extinction.

Explore further: US museum exhibit to focus on endangered plants

Related Stories

Thousands of undiscovered plant species face extinction

July 7, 2010

Faced with threats such as habitat loss and climate change, thousands of rare flowering plant species worldwide may become extinct before scientists can even discover them, according to a paper published today by a trio of ...

Cracking the species code for plants

February 17, 2009

A recent article published in the Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society searches for one or more short pieces of DNA code that could eventually be used in an automated fashion to reliably identify almost all land plant ...

UK botanists bank 10% of world's plant species

October 15, 2009

Botanists at Britain's Kew Gardens have collected seeds from 10 percent of the world's wild plants, their first goal in a long-term project to protect all endangered species, they said Thursday.

Darwinian mystery may have been solved

May 11, 2006

U.S. scientists may have solved Charles Darwin's "abominable mystery" of flowering plants' rapid evolution after they appeared 140 million years ago.

Recommended for you

Female golden snub-nosed monkeys share nursing of young

February 21, 2019

An international team of researchers including The University of Western Australia and China's Central South University of Forestry and Technology has discovered that female golden snub-nosed monkeys in China are happy to ...

When does one of the central ideas in economics work?

February 20, 2019

The concept of equilibrium is one of the most central ideas in economics. It is one of the core assumptions in the vast majority of economic models, including models used by policymakers on issues ranging from monetary policy ...

In colliding galaxies, a pipsqueak shines bright

February 20, 2019

In the nearby Whirlpool galaxy and its companion galaxy, M51b, two supermassive black holes heat up and devour surrounding material. These two monsters should be the most luminous X-ray sources in sight, but a new study using ...

Research reveals why the zebra got its stripes

February 20, 2019

Why do zebras have stripes? A study published in PLOS ONE today takes us another step closer to answering this puzzling question and to understanding how stripes actually work.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 23, 2010
to make awarness of yhe people's
Sep 23, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1.5 / 5 (2) Sep 23, 2010
It is understandable, but very surprising to a layman, that biologists did not know how many flowering plant species there are. Researchers have a long way to go. This should give pause to those who hear drastic recommendations for change or expensive new solutions to reported problems. Maybe we just do not really have a handle on some issues or some fields of study.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2010
My understanding was that there were over 10,000 species of orchids. I am kind of shocked that the total number of flowering plant species is so low.
not rated yet Sep 23, 2010
My understanding was that there were over 10,000 species of orchids. I am kind of shocked that the total number of flowering plant species is so low.

The problem is in identifying unique species. True, there are very many varieties of orchids, but they tend to be very plastic when it comes to hybridization (that is, two species can have a hybrid that is able to reproduce). There's a general trend in taxonomy now to cut down on the number of species, although all this does is leave high numbers of subspecies, cultivars, hybrids, etc. I'm willing to bet that a large portion of those 600,000 are morphologically distinct plants, that simply failed to pass the degree of genetic or whatever other difference the researchers used.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.