UN board could rein in $2.7 billion carbon market

(AP) -- An obscure U.N. board that oversees a $2.7 billion market intended to cut heat-trapping gases has agreed to take steps that could lead to it eventually reining in what European and U.S. environmentalists are calling a huge scam.

At a meeting this week that ended Friday, the executive board of the U.N.'s Clean Development Mechanism said that five chemical plants in China would no longer qualify for funding as so-called carbon offset credits until the environmentalists' claims can be further investigated.

The "CDM" credits have been widely used in the carbon trading markets of the European Union, Japan and other nations that signed onto the 1997 Kyoto Protocol requiring mandatory cuts in .

Rather than cut their own , industrialized nations can buy the credits which then pay developing countries to cut their greenhouse gases instead.

But say rich nations could be wasting billions of dollars on what some are calling "perverse financial incentives," because some of the largest projects funded by the U.N.-managed CDM are a golden goose for chemical makers without making meaningful cuts in emissions.

The CDM executive board, based in Bonn, Germany, has asked for a decades' worth of data on the gases from those five plants in China to study whether the system was manipulated.

The controversy revolves around the apparent conflict between the Kyoto climate treaty and another U.N. treaty, the 1987 Montreal Protocol for repairing the Earth's fragile .

The money from the CDM-authorized fund goes to pay the carbon offset credits claimed by more than 20 chemical makers mostly in China and India, but also in nations such as South Korea, Argentina and Mexico.

The chemical makers are paid as much as $100,000 or more for every ton they destroy of a potent greenhouse gas, HFC-23. The price for destroying it is based on its being 11,700 times more powerful as a climate-warming gas than .

But that gas is a byproduct of an ozone-friendly refrigerant, HCFC-22, which those chemical makers also are paid to produce under the U.N.'s ozone treaty. Environmentalists say there is so much money in getting rid of HFC-23 that the chemical makers are overproducing HCFC-22 to have more of the byproduct to destroy.

"The evidence is overwhelming that manufacturers are creating excess HFC-23 simply to destroy it and earn carbon credits," said Mark Roberts of the Environmental Investigation Agency, a research and advocacy group. "This is the biggest environmental scandal in history and makes an absolute mockery of international efforts to combat climate change.

HCFC-22 is widely used in hair sprays, air conditioners and some refrigerators because it less damaging to the seasonal ozone hole over Antarctica than previous coolants. It has been promoted under the ozone treaty, often considered one of the world's most successful environmental treaties, as a replacement for chloroflourocarbons, or CFCs.


Explore further

US wants to move on climate change

©2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Citation: UN board could rein in $2.7 billion carbon market (2010, August 21) retrieved 25 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2010-08-board-rein-billion-carbon.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 21, 2010
hold a rigged investigation, give everybody a pat on the back and tell them that it's not a scam, then implement carbon trading outright scamming people who have already had their retirements looted, taxes increased to almost half their income (half of nothing is still nothing), and ensuring that the elite have a handhold over the lives of people where they set everything, wages (at china rates), what people eat, extra laws and rules to engage the sheep.

Aug 21, 2010
Why are we still in the UN again? I think it's time that the US, Europe, Japan, and the world's other democracies created their own international organization for only democracies. This will eliminate the huge bias that the current UN has toward corrupt income redistribution and looking the other way from tyrannical dictators (since half the nations in the UN are controlled by tyrannical dictators anyway).

Aug 22, 2010
You think the USA would actually recognize any impediment to their Empire's freedom to loot?

We really need a brave new world with universal law. Nations are so 1700's. China and the Un are doing the right thing, while the USA foolishly dithers, much to the chagrin of the world.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more