A Serious Question: Why Do We Laugh?

October 14, 2009
Anthropology graduate student Robert Lynch has a laugh with his son, Nicholas.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Not surprisingly, Robert Lynch begins his research paper "It's Funny Because We Think It's True: Laughter is Augmented by Implicit Preferences" with a joke. Not his joke, but one taken from a toast Homer Simpson makes in a 2004 episode of The Simpsons: "To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems."

In his experiment, Lynch, a graduate student in the Department of Anthropology, tested the common belief that we find things funny because something about them is subjectively true - that is, it rings true for us. His paper appears online in the journal of Evolution and Human Behavior.

Why test scientifically something that everyone accepts as obvious?

First, Lynch said, our common sense assumptions about the world are often wrong. once had the sun circling the earth, but science showed that assumption to be false. Second, and much more to Lynch’s purpose, there must be some evolutionary function for laughter since all human cultures have laughter. “It’s universal,” he said. “Everyone laughs at something, though not everyone laughs at the same things.”

Lynch asked 59 undergraduates (26 men, 33 women; 36 Caucasians, 21 Asian Americans, and two African Americans) to watch a 30-minute video of stand-up comedian Bill Burr’s 2005 HBO special. He chose a comic as his tool for this experiment because the comic is entirely on his or her own without other performers or laugh tracks. Lynch selected Burr because the comedian’s jokes often turn on race and gender, and this has made him the subject of some controversy.

Besides viewing Burr’s comedy, the students took two computer-based implicit association tests (IAT) to measure their attitudes about race and gender. IATs measure the strength of association between concepts in a person’s memory. The faster the subject associates two concepts - say, “man” and “career” or “woman” and “cooking” - the stronger that association is in the subject’s mind.

Lynch also videotaped his subjects as they watched Burr’s routine and then used the Emotional Facial Action Coding System to interpret their facial reactions to what they saw and heard. EMFACS allows researchers to classify and deconstruct any visible facial movement and helps them understand whether a smile, for instance, is sincere or insincere. Finally, each student watched the routine alone. “There was no reason for them to laugh if they didn’t think the routine was funny,” Lynch said.

Using the IAT to determine his subjects’ implicit attitudes, and isolation and EMFACS to protect the sincerity of their responses to Burr’s comedy, Lynch concluded that, yes, people really do laugh because something in a joke or situation rings true for them.

So what?

“If implicit preferences affect our response to humor, then laughter may serve as a signal that we share the joke teller’s beliefs, biases, or preferences,” Lynch wrote.

Lynch’s research suggests to him that, since humor is entirely subjective, our signals to others that we have a bond with them. He believes ability to recognize our own - however we might define “our own” - gives us an evolutionary advantage. We’re members of the same tribe. So we feel safer sharing more information about each other; we might share a meal, start a business, or get married.

Provided by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Explore further: Study shows out laughter is contagious

Related Stories

Study shows out laughter is contagious

December 13, 2006

Laughter is said to be contagious and now British scientists studying how the brain responds to emotive sounds believe they understand why.

Laughter Differs In Children With Autism

July 10, 2009

According to a recent paper entitled "Laughter Differs in Children with Autism: An Acoustic Analysis of Laughter Produced by Children with and without the Disorder" in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, children ...

Scientists study origins of laughter

November 22, 2005

Binghamton University scientists have posited the evolutionary origins of types of laughter -- stimulus-driven and that which is self-generated.

Recommended for you

Genetics preserves traces of ancient resistance to Inca rule

December 12, 2017

The Chachapoyas region was conquered by the Inca Empire in the late 15th century. Knowledge of the fate of the local population has been based largely on Inca oral histories, written down only decades later after the Spanish ...

Violence a matter of scale, not quantity, researchers show

December 11, 2017

Anthropologists have debated for decades whether humans living in tribal communities thousands of years ago were more or less violent than societies today. Researchers at the University of Notre Dame wonder if the question ...

Nuclear technology unlocks 50-million-year-old time capsules

December 11, 2017

A scientific analysis of fossilised tree resin has caused a rethink of Australia's prehistoric ecosystem, and could pave the way to recovering more preserved palaeobiological artefacts from the time of dinosaurs or prehistoric ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.3 / 5 (3) Oct 14, 2009
Stranger in a Strange Land. I grok this. Also consider thr fact that when we laugh it is the result of someone being hurt in some way. Think about it. Nothing is truly funny unless somebody suffers!!
not rated yet Oct 15, 2009
What does this study say of we sober individuals that don't often laugh? Why is a room full of drinkers often noisy with laughter?
not rated yet Oct 15, 2009
Quite some years ago, 50 or so, a study was performed to find out why people laugh. It concluded that there were three causes. 1-Shock, 2-Surprise, 3-Embarrassment. I agree.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.