Physicists resolve a paradox of quantum theory

January 14, 2009,

University of Toronto quantum physicists Jeff Lundeen and Aephraim Steinberg have shown that Hardy's paradox, a proposal that has confounded physicists for over a decade, can be confirmed and ultimately resolved, a task which had seemingly been impossible to perform.

"For nearly a century, the widespread interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that everything is uncertain until it is observed, and that observation inevitably alters reality," says Professor Steinberg. "However, in the 1990s, a technique known as 'interaction-free measurement' seemed to promise the ability to 'see without looking,' as a Scientific American article put it at the time. But when Lucien Hardy proposed that one could never reliably make inferences about past events which hadn't been directly observed, a paradox emerged which suggested that whenever one attempted to reason about the past in this way they would be led into error."

Over the course of nearly two years of work, Steinberg and then-student Jeff Lundeen, now a research associate at the National Research Council of Canada, built a complicated quantum optical experiment and developed new theoretical tools. In essence, they combined Hardy's Paradox with a new theory known as weak measurement proposed by Tel Aviv University physicist Yakir Aharonov, showing that in one sense, one can indeed talk about the past, resolving the paradox. Weak measurement is a tool whereby the presence of a detector is less than the level of uncertainty around what is being measured, so that there is an imperceptible impact on the experiment. "We found that all of the seemingly paradoxical conclusions in Hardy's Paradox can, in fact, be experimentally verified," says Steinberg, "but that the use of weak measurement removes the contradiction."

"Until recently, it seemed impossible to carry out Hardy's proposal in practice, let alone to confirm or resolve the paradox," he says. "We have finally been able to do so, and to apply Aharonov's methods to the problem, showing that there is a way, even in quantum mechanics, in which one can quite consistently discuss past events even after they are over and done. Weak measurement finds what is there without disturbing it."

The findings are published online today in an article titled "Experimental Joint Weak Measurement on a Photon Pair as a Probe of Hardy's Paradox" in the January 16 issue of the Physical Review of Letters at link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v102/e020404 .

Source: University of Toronto

Explore further: Quantum paradox directly observed -- a milestone in quantum mechanics

Related Stories

Are weak values quantum? Don't bet on it

September 24, 2014

(Phys.org) —New work asserts that a key technique used to probe quantum systems may not be so quantum after all, according to Perimeter postdoctoral researcher Joshua Combes and his colleague Christopher Ferrie.

How does light travel?

May 20, 2016

Ever since Democritus – a Greek philosopher who lived between the 5th and 4th century's BCE – argued that all of existence was made up of tiny indivisible atoms, scientists have been speculating as to the true nature ...

Solving the Hox Specificity Paradox

January 22, 2015

The remarkable diversity of anatomical features along the body axis of animals—the differences between the head, the thorax and the abdomen, for example—is determined by proteins in the Hox family. But almost as soon ...

Physicist Proposes Solution to Arrow-of-Time Paradox

August 27, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Entropy can decrease, according to a new proposal - but the process would destroy any evidence of its existence, and erase any memory an observer might have of it. It sounds like the plot to a weird sci-fi ...

Recommended for you

New insights into magnetic quantum effects in solids

January 23, 2019

Using a new computational method, an international collaboration has succeeded for the first time in systematically investigating magnetic quantum effects in the well-known 3-D pyrochlore Heisenberg model. The surprising ...

Rapid and continuous 3-D printing with light

January 22, 2019

Three-dimensional (3-D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing (AM), can transform a material layer by layer to build an object of interest. 3-D printing is not a new concept, since stereolithography printers have ...

Scientists discover new quantum spin liquid

January 22, 2019

An international research team led by the University of Liverpool and McMaster University has made a significant breakthrough in the search for new states of matter.

Researchers capture an image of negative capacitance in action

January 21, 2019

For the first time ever, an international team of researchers imaged the microscopic state of negative capacitance. This novel result provides researchers with fundamental, atomistic insight into the physics of negative capacitance, ...

Toward ultrafast spintronics

January 21, 2019

Electronics have advanced through continuous improvements in microprocessor technology since the 1960s. However, this process of refinement is projected to stall in the near future due to constraints imposed by the laws of ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

podizzle
3.5 / 5 (2) Jan 14, 2009
wow this time machine prototype is taking forever. (posted from the future with my weak measurement computer)
Pointedly
4.2 / 5 (6) Jan 14, 2009
Hey, podizzle. I thought I felt that I was being weakly measured...but I was uncertain.
el_gramador
not rated yet Jan 15, 2009
Okay guys enough with the puns, we don't want to hit another heisenberg.
Alexa
5 / 5 (1) Jan 24, 2009
By AWT the particles of reality are formed by nested density fluctuations of hypothetical particle field, so called an Aether. The measurement mean, the surface undulations of particles will get synchronized with those of observer (i.e. entangled), so that the relative component of mutual motion dissapears (collapse of wave function).

The weak measurement would mean, only undulations on certain level of nested density fluctuations will get synchronized.

For example, it's quite probable, if we succeede in particle localization by it's own gravity field at distance, such subtle observation wouldn't affect the actual particle spin or other basic properties at all, which would allow deterministic intepretation of quantum mechanics - at least up to certain level.

Was such explanation clear for you?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.