Freshwater runoff from the Greenland Ice Sheet will more than double by the end of the century

June 12, 2008
East Greenland Runoff
Freshwater runoff in East Greenland, Mittivakkat Glacier, Ammassalik Island in 2005. Credit: Sebastian H. Mernild

The Greenland Ice Sheet is melting faster than previously calculated according to a recently released scientific paper by University of Alaska Fairbanks researcher Sebastian H. Mernild.

The study, published in the journal Hydrological Processes, is based on models using data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as well as satellite images and observations from on the ground in Greenland.

Mernild and his team found that the total amount of fresh water projected to flow from the Greenland Ice Sheet into the North Atlantic Ocean from 2071 to 2100 will be more than double current levels.

Today, the East Greenland Ice Sheet adds 257 cubic kilometers of fresh water to the ocean per year from both melting and iceberg calving. By 2100, those levels are estimated to reach 456 cubic kilometers per year. With land-based runoff factored in, the total fresh water flowing from Greenland into the ocean is estimated to increase from 438 cubic kilometers to 650 cubic kilometers by 2100. The projected increase means that rather than rising at a rate of 1.1 millimeters per year, sea levels would rise by 1.6 millimeters per year.

"The Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance is changing as a response to the altered climatic state," said Mernild. "This is faster than expected. This affects freshwater runoff input to the North Atlantic Ocean and plays an important role in determining the global sea level rise and global ocean … circulation."

Mernild is conducting the research as part of the University of Alaska's International Polar Year efforts. He was appointed a University of Alaska IPY postdoctoral fellow by UA president Mark Hamilton in 2007.

Source: University of Alaska Fairbanks

Explore further: Science update on climate change: from bad to worse

Related Stories

Science update on climate change: from bad to worse

November 17, 2017

Scientists monitoring the Earth's climate and environment have delivered a cascade of grim news this year, adding a sense of urgency to UN talks on how best to draw down the greenhouse gases that drive global warming.

New Greenland maps show more glaciers at risk

November 1, 2017

New maps of Greenland's coastal seafloor and bedrock beneath its massive ice sheet show that two to four times as many coastal glaciers are at risk of accelerated melting as had previously been thought.

Melting ice sheets will have global impact on ocean tides

November 9, 2017

Whilst it is widely accepted that sea level is rising because of the melting of the massive sheets covering Greenland and Antarctica, a new paper in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans by scientists at Bangor University ...

Climate science update: bad news gets worse

November 3, 2017

Scientists monitoring Earth's climate and environment have delivered a cascade of grim news in 2017, adding to the urgency of UN talks in Bonn next week tasked with ramping up efforts to tame global warming.

Recommended for you

Scientists dispute missing dryland forests

November 21, 2017

Scientists are disputing the possibility that a significant portion of the world's forests have been missed in an earlier accounting of ecological diversity.

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Ninderthana
1.8 / 5 (5) Jun 13, 2008
This is science reporting at its absolute worst.
The assumption of this article is that world temperatures will heat up over the next century because of man-made CO2 in the atmosphere.

This is an unproven scientific hypothesis, yet it is taken as Gospel by pseudo-scientist that wrote this article.

When will people in the media stop basing alarmist predictions on wild scientific speculation.

An article like this just degrades the scientific method.
rubberman
3 / 5 (4) Jun 13, 2008
You just commented on the scientific method, WHILE stating that the article makes an ASSUMPTION that isn't mentioned or even hinted at in the article. How scientific is that?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.