Nearby star should harbor detectable, Earth-like planets

March 7, 2008
Nearby star should harbor detectable, Earth-like planets
An artist's conception of a terrestrial planet in the star system Alpha Centauri. Image by Mark Fisher.

A rocky planet similar to Earth may be orbiting one of our nearest stellar neighbors and could be detected using existing techniques, according to a new study led by astronomers at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

The closest stars to our Sun are in the three-star system called Alpha Centauri, a popular destination for interstellar travel in works of science fiction. UCSC graduate student Javiera Guedes used computer simulations of planet formation to show that terrestrial planets are likely to have formed around the star Alpha Centauri B and to be orbiting in the "habitable zone" where liquid water can exist on the planet's surface. The researchers then showed that such planets could be observed using a dedicated telescope.

"If they exist, we can observe them," said Guedes, who is the first author of a paper describing the new findings. The paper has been accepted for publication by the Astrophysical Journal.

Coauthor Gregory Laughlin, professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UCSC, said a number of factors converge to make Alpha Centauri B an excellent candidate for finding terrestrial planets. The Doppler detection method, which has revealed the majority of the 228 known extrasolar planets, measures shifts in the light from a star to detect the tiny wobble induced by the gravitational tug of an orbiting planet. Factors that favor the use of this technique for Alpha Centauri B include the brightness of the star and its position in the sky, which gives it a long period of observability each year from the Southern Hemisphere, Laughlin said.

Detecting small, rocky planets the size of Earth is challenging, however, because they induce a relatively small wobble in their host stars. According to Laughlin, five years of observations using a dedicated telescope would be needed to detect an Earth-like planet around Alpha Centauri B.

Coauthor Debra Fischer of San Francisco State University is leading an observational program to intensively monitor Alpha Centauri using the 1.5-meter telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. The researchers hope to detect real planets similar to the ones that emerged in the computer simulations.

"I think the planets are there, and it's worth a try to have a look," Laughlin said.

To study planet formation around Alpha Centauri B, the team ran repeated computer simulations, evolving the system for the equivalent of 200 million years each time. Because of variations in the initial conditions, each simulation led to the formation of a different planetary system. In every case, however, a system of multiple planets evolved with at least one planet about the size of Earth. In many cases, the simulated planets had orbits lying within the habitable zone of the star.

In addition to Guedes, Laughlin, and Fischer, the authors of the paper include UCSC postdoctoral researcher Eugenio Rivera and graduate student Erica Davis, and Elisa Quintana of the SETI Institute. This research was supported by NASA and the National Science Foundation.

Source: University of California, Santa Cruz

Explore further: Kepler satellite discovers variability in the Seven Sisters

Related Stories

Kepler satellite discovers variability in the Seven Sisters

August 25, 2017

The Seven Sisters, as they were known to the ancient Greeks, are now known to modern astronomers as the Pleiades star cluster – a set of stars which are visible to the naked eye and have been studied for thousands of years ...

Breakthrough lofts the smallest satellites ever

July 27, 2017

In 2015, Russian billionaire Yuri Milner established Breakthrough Initiatives, a non-profit organization dedicated to enhancing the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). In April of the following year, he and the ...

VLT to search for planets in Alpha Centauri system

January 9, 2017

ESO has signed an agreement with the Breakthrough Initiatives to adapt the Very Large Telescope instrumentation in Chile to conduct a search for planets in the nearby star system Alpha Centauri. Such planets could be the ...

Recommended for you

Fast radio bursts may be firing off every second

September 21, 2017

When fast radio bursts, or FRBs, were first detected in 2001, astronomers had never seen anything like them before. Since then, astronomers have found a couple of dozen FRBs, but they still don't know what causes these rapid ...

Ageing star blows off smoky bubble

September 20, 2017

Astronomers have used ALMA to capture a strikingly beautiful view of a delicate bubble of expelled material around the exotic red star U Antliae. These observations will help astronomers to better understand how stars evolve ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (4) Mar 07, 2008
What more could habitable planet searchers have wanted. A potential earthlike planet rotating around our nearest neighbor.
Certainly adds to the odds of planets all over the place too.
5 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2008
A possible Earth like planet so close to home is intriguing
5 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2008
This is the most exciting news in the extra-solar planet hunt in some time:). I hope these simulations pan out once the fine observations of the Alpha Centauri system come in:).
2.7 / 5 (3) Mar 07, 2008
I want to believe that the likelihood of habitable planets exist around the nearest stars is pretty good... But i did read an article which listed SOME of the factors that made earth a "habitable" planet.

1. The "perfect" mass of the earth and
2. its velocity allow it to have an
3. orbit of one year(even distribution of heat)
4. which is not extremely elliptical(requirement)
5. sun`s intensity is perfect for the earth`s
orbital distance, keeping us from
6. Our moon keeps the earth from shifting around
its spin axis(now at 20 something?)
7. Rotation period around its axis at 24 hrs(one
day.. too long or too short would at least
slow down "evolutionary" progress maybe even
stop it)
8. The right mix of elements allowing life to
9. non-binary system a MUST..
apparently about half of the stars in the sky
are binary or three stars in close proximity

10. Must be in a non-cluttered area of the galaxy
(along spiral arms somewhere i guess)

There must be other factors as well but i dont remember them/dont know them/havent been discovered yet.

the more time i spent looking at the article, the more i realised that "habitable" planets are not too easy to come by...
3 / 5 (1) Mar 07, 2008
But how are the bars on this new planet? Are they trendy? Are the women attractive, so-so or "beasts"? How is the food? I don't want to travel all the way there to find ring worms a delicacy! These questions must be answered before we plan a trip.
5 / 5 (3) Mar 08, 2008
zbarlici, almost all of those things are a load of ****:). At some point (like, 50 years ago) some of those were believed to be true, but not any more.

1) Earth doesn't have a "perfect mass". It has approximately the minimum mass for Plate Tectonics (could be a bit smaller, but not much). Anything larger than Earth, but small enough to have a reasonable surface gravity will do.

2) Orbital velocity is meaningless to life. Can you feel how fast the Earth is moving? No? Me either.

3) Orbital period is meaningless to life.

4) Yeah, overly elliptical isn't good. But Earth's orbit isn't all that circular. As long as it isn't TOO elliptical, it's fine. Other planets in the Sol system have orbits more circular than Earth's orbit.

5) The sun's intensity doesn't matter. As long as it is a stable, long lived star, and the planet is at the correct distance from that particular star for liquid water to form, it's all cool.

6) That one is kinda funny, cause I've read that before too in old books (not about the moon, but about Earth having the "right" axial tilt). However, more recent research has found that Earth has the SECOND WORST POSSIBLE axial tilt, other than having the poles pointed straight at the sun (70 to 110 degrees is the worst). Our axial tilt makes Earth's environment highly unstable and non-conductive to life.

7) Rotation period isn't all that important. If the planet were tidally locked it would decrease the likelyhood of life, but other than that, anything is fine.

8) Well, what's the right mix? Both Oxygen and water are highly corrosive, incredibly dangerous substances. In fact, our bodies spend a good portion of their energy repairing the constant, nagging damage done to us by the very air that we breath and water that we are made out of. What exists on Earth is the right mix for us because this is were we evolved. If different compounds had existed here (or if the amounts of the current ones were way different), then we would be different to compensate.

9) Not true. Stable planetary systems are more than capable of forming in binary systems. At least, as long as the stars aren't in a weird orbit around each other (... what were the numbers... I don't quite remember... something like... if they are more than 0.1AUs apart AND closer than 6 AUs then a planetary system couldn't form. The numbers were something like that. If they are closer together than 0.1 AU then the planets circle both stars. If they are farther than 6 AU apart then both stars can have their own, separate planets. I don't believe that a figure 8 around both stars is stable though (unfortunately, cause that would just be cool:)).

10) Yup. More or less anyway. It's less likely that a planet will be murdered by a supernovae, radiationed to death by nearby stars, or be tossed out of its orbit if it is in the "habitable zone" of a galaxy. Planets can still form in other locations, but it is less likely that life will be able to live there due to less than stellar conditions (or TOO stellar hehe).
not rated yet Mar 10, 2008
I wonder why they havn't examined the Alpha Centauri system years ago.
not rated yet Apr 16, 2008
'Our axial tilt makes Earth's environment highly unstable and non-conductive to life.'

Or could that actually mean more conductive to life since it would potentially mean more biodiversity and more motive to adapt?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.