Primordial fish had rudimentary fingers

Sep 22, 2008

Tetrapods, the first four-legged land animals, are regarded as the first organisms that had fingers and toes. Now researchers at Uppsala University can show that this is wrong. Using medical x-rays, they found rudiments of fingers in the fins in fossil Panderichthys, the “transitional animal,” which indicates that rudimentary fingers developed considerably earlier than was previously thought.

Our fish ancestors evolved into the first four-legged animals, tetrapods, 380 million years ago. They are the forerunners of all birds, mammals, crustaceans, and batrachians. Since limbs and their fingers are so important to evolution, researchers have long wondered whether they appeared for the first time in tetrapods, or whether they had evolved from elements that already existed in their fish ancestors.

When they examined genes that are necessary for the evolution of fins in zebrafish (a ray-finned fish that is a distant relative of coelacanth fishes) and compared them with the gene that regulates the development of limbs in mice, researchers found that zebrafish lacked the genetic mechanisms that are necessary for the development of fingers. It was therefore concluded that fingers appeared for the first time in tetrapods. This reading was supported by the circumstance that the fossil Panderichthys, a “transitional animal” between fish and tetrapod, appeared to lack finger rudiments in their fins.

In the present study, to be published in Nature, medical x-rays (CT scans) were used to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of Panderichthys fins. The results show hitherto undiscovered elements that constitute rudiments of fingers in the fins. Similar rudiments have been demonstrated once in the past, two years ago in Tiktaaliks, which is a more tetrapod-like group. Together with information about fin development in sharks, paddlefish, and Australian lungfish, the scientists can now definitively conclude that fingers were not something new in tetrapods.

“This was the key piece of the puzzle that confirms that rudimentary fingers were already present in ancestors of tetrapods,” says Catherine Boisvert.

Source: Uppsala University

Explore further: New conversion process turns biomass 'waste' into lucrative chemical products (w/ Video)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Life on Earth still favours evolution over creationism

Sep 11, 2014

Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, first published in 1859, offered a bold new explanation for how animals and plants diversified and still serves as the foundation underpinning all medical and biological ...

Houston museum unveils $85 million dinosaur hall

May 22, 2012

(AP) -- Pups in her womb, a large eye visible behind the rib cage, one baby stuck in the birth canal: all fossilized evidence that this ancient marine beast, the Ichthyosaur, died in childbirth.

Conquest of land began in shark genome

Aug 15, 2007

When the first four-legged animals sprouted fingers and toes, they took an ancient genetic recipe and simply extended the cooking time, say University of Florida scientists writing in Wednesday’s issue of the journal PLoS ...

Recommended for you

Discovery in the fight against antibiotic-resistant bacteria

58 minutes ago

For four years, researchers at Universite catholique de Louvain have been trying to find out how bacteria can withstand antibiotics, so as to be able to attack them more effectively. These researchers now understand how one ...

Stem cells born out of indecision

58 minutes ago

Scientists at the University of Copenhagen have gained new insight into embryonic stem cells and how blocking their ability to make choices explains why they stay as stem cells in culture. The results have just been published ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Modernmystic
5 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2008
Ok, I'm a soild proponent of evolution, but I'm having a hard time seeing the advantage for fish having fingers. That is unless they were spending some time on land...which I don't think this article is saying.

Perhaps there was no advantage and it was just a "carry over" mutation UNTIL they started invading the land....
photojack
5 / 5 (1) Sep 22, 2008
They could have been a stiffener for fins that were modified as they adapted to locomotion on land. The fact that they have been found much earlier than expected is great and it totally supports Darwinian evolution. Genetics and cladistics will continue to make such links and discoveries as more "transitional animals" are found. SCIENCE PREVAILS!
D666
5 / 5 (2) Sep 22, 2008
Ok, I'm a soild proponent of evolution, but I'm having a hard time seeing the advantage for fish having fingers.


This is a job for..... Exaption! (I'm never sure if I'm spelling that right). Probably the structures were useful for something else, like digging in the muck. Then when the fish started invading the land, they turned out to be useful for that too.
mattytheory
not rated yet Sep 22, 2008
Exaption.. had to look that up; knew the concept, now know the term. Definitely makes sense in this context. Glad I learned something!
ofidiofile
not rated yet Sep 23, 2008
"Our fish ancestors evolved into the first four-legged animals, tetrapods, 380 million years ago. They are the forerunners of all birds, mammals, crustaceans, and batrachians."

okay, this is a silly error... crustaceans are definitely NOT descendants of a fish-like ancestor. they split off from deuterostome coelomates (chordates, hemichordates, echinoderms) along with all other protostome creatures.
D666
5 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2008

This is a job for..... Exaption! (I'm never sure if I'm spelling that right).


And of course, I didn't. The proper spelling is "Exaptation".

Must. Drink. More. Coffee.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.