September 22, 2022

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Exploring carbon emissions in peatland restoration

Burns Bog, a roughly 35-square-kilometer peatland, is situated on the Fraser River delta south of Vancouver, B.C. Disturbances to and drainage of the peatlands in the 20th century allowed larger, woodier plants and trees to displace native mosses, although restoration efforts have occurred in recent decades. Credit: Marion Nyberg, CC BY-SA 3.0
× close
Burns Bog, a roughly 35-square-kilometer peatland, is situated on the Fraser River delta south of Vancouver, B.C. Disturbances to and drainage of the peatlands in the 20th century allowed larger, woodier plants and trees to displace native mosses, although restoration efforts have occurred in recent decades. Credit: Marion Nyberg, CC BY-SA 3.0

Peatlands are important players in the global carbon cycle, storing vast amounts of carbon in the ground. Water keeps bog soils wet and anaerobic, which facilitates this storage and keeps the ecosystem thriving.

When bogs are drained or otherwise dry out, peatland ecosystems suffer. Drier conditions also mean that stored carbon is released into the atmosphere as , contributing to climate warming.

Previous research has suggested that rewetting dry peatlands is a way to restore ecosystem health, reduce , and increase carbon storage within these environments. However, adding water to a bog can increase emissions of methane, a far more potent than carbon dioxide. The balance of carbon dioxide and methane storage and release in restored peatlands also depends on site conditions such as soil temperature and plant communities.

To better understand carbon exchanges in peatlands undergoing different restoration and rewetting approaches, Nyberg et al. studied two sites—a wetter, actively rewetted site, and a drier, passively rewetted site—in a bog near Vancouver, B.C., Canada. The researchers monitored at both sites and evaluated carbon dioxide and methane fluxes. After one year, they found that the wetter site served as a weak carbon dioxide sink, albeit with relatively high methane emissions, whereas the drier site was nearly .

Forward modeling suggested that both sites are likely to be net contributors to climatic warming on 20- and 100-year timescales, with methane emissions offsetting carbon dioxide storage, particularly at the wetter site. However, over multiple centuries, the modeling indicated that sustained greater uptake of carbon dioxide at the wetter site would eventually win out and the site would have a greater net cooling effect on the climate.

The researchers note that overall, restoration at both sites was beneficial for climate, and they point out that their results are useful in guiding peatland restoration and land management decisions.

More information: M. Nyberg et al, Impacts of Active Versus Passive Re‐Wetting on the Carbon Balance of a Previously Drained Bog, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences (2022). DOI: 10.1029/2022JG006881

Provided by Eos

Load comments (0)