Cooling the planet with crops

Cooling the planet with crops
Potential cooling effects of growing more reflective crops over the next 100 years. The left hand image shows the predicted increase in temperature levels at the end of the century, caused by a doubling of current CO2 levels. The right hand image shows the possible cooling effects of growing more reflective crops. Colour scale: white = 2 degrees of warming (or less) to black = 8 degrees of warming (or more).
( -- By carefully selecting which varieties of food crops to cultivate, much of Europe and North America could be cooled by up to 1°C during the summer growing season, say researchers from the University of Bristol, UK. This is equivalent to an annual global cooling of over 0.1°C, almost 20% of the total global temperature increase since the Industrial Revolution.

The growing of crops already produces a cooling of the climate because they reflect more sunlight back into space, compared with natural vegetation. Different varieties of the same crop vary significantly in their solar reflectivity (called 'albedo'), so selecting varieties that are more reflective will enhance this cooling effect. Since arable agriculture is a global industry, such cooling could be extensive.

Reporting today [15 January] in Current Biology, Dr Andy Ridgwell and colleagues at the University of Bristol argue that we should select crop varieties in order to exert a control on the climate, in the same way that we currently cultivate specific varieties to maximize and fine-tune food production.

Dr Ridgwell said: "We have evaluated the effect of our approach in a global climate model. By choosing from among current crop varieties, our best estimate for how much reflectivity might be increased leads us to predict that summer-time temperatures could be reduced by more than 1°C throughout much of central North America and mid-latitude Eurasia. Ultimately, further regional cooling of the climate could be made through selective breeding or genetic modification to optimise crop plant albedo."

The team emphasised that unlike growing biofuels, such a plan could be achieved without disrupting food production, either in terms of yield or the types of crops grown. "We propose choosing between different varieties of the same crop species in order to maximize solar reflectivity rather than changing crop type, although the latter could also produce climatic benefits," explained Ridgwell.

Over the next hundred years, making these kinds of decisions would be equivalent to averting the carbon footprint of 195 billion tonnes of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere. Farmers could be encouraged to grow such crops by issuing them with carbon credits. Ridgwell has calculated that if such a mechanism were in place farmers might expect to earn in the region of 23 euros per hectare per year for the warming averted. Biofuels currently earn 45 euros per hectare per year, but take up valuable agricultural land needed for growing crops.

Plants differ in their albedo because of differences in the properties of the leaf's surface and how the leaves are arranged (called 'canopy morphology'). The team therefore propose that the varieties grown should be chosen for their reflective properties alongside other considerations already made when planting crops, such as the food processing characteristics of a grain. ¬

Since society has so far remained unwilling to make the drastic reductions in fossil fuel use needed to cut carbon dioxide emissions, simple alternatives such as growing more reflective crops are a realistic way of helping reduce the severity of heat waves and droughts in these regions. Results could be achieved very quickly and at very little cost.

"There is a clear need for more research into characterising the variability in albedo that currently exists between the different variants and strains of common crop plants," commented Ridgwell. "We are applying for funding that will enable us to better quantify what is possible now, what variability there is for future selective breeding, and whether there is a need for genetic modification in the future".

Provided by University of Bristol

Explore further

Capturing carbon to fight climate change is dividing environmentalists

Citation: Cooling the planet with crops (2009, January 15) retrieved 22 April 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 15, 2009
OK, why would we want to do this? I realize that there are people who want to be the high priest, standing on top of the pyramid, in the feather cape ala "Real Genies" but why would any of us want to enable the fantasies of priest/king relevancy.

Jan 18, 2009
Since the USA is the world's top agricultural producer, we my be able to reduce our carbon footprint to neutral by simply genetically engineering our crops to have reflective leaf structures as described in this report.... or better, simply replace tar roofs with light colored metal ones and asphalt roadways with concrete.

If this sounds a bit sarcastic, it is. We need better information about the causes and effects of this so-called Global Warming.... cause if things keep going the way they are, we might just freeze to death!

Also, I understand CO2 levels are rising, but I still have not seen a definitive assessment of how much of that is due to the enormous clearing of forests and jungles as the 3rd world population expands and attempts to become industrial. Is it not true that higher CO2 levels lead to more rapid plant growth (and algae growth)? Isn't the earth already attempting to compensate for the higher CO2 levels? If not, why not?

Until we understand these processes much better, we are likely to actually do harm to the environment through misguided changes....

You all realize, don't you, that particulate matter in the atmosphere contributes to cloud formation that leads to reflection of sunlight and COOLING. Thus the elimination of pollution in our fight against smog certainly helped lung-health, but it also contributed to Global Warming!

The many complex interactions and the long time delays involved in all changes to the global biosphere makes all existing computer models hard to believe.... we clearly need more data.

Perhaps the BEST way to make sure the environment does not collapse is to reduce the rate of population growth.... by promoting monogamy, no sex outside of marriage, eliminate suggestive advertising, encourage "conservative" dress, ban drugs and alcohol, and encourage the monastic life, discouraging "fast cars", tourism, and a consumption based economy.

Odds are these "cultural changes" would be as effective, or more effective than most of the proposals made to date.... yet I feel we are more addicted to our consumptive life-styles than we are to oil!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more