'Mind's eye' influences visual perception

Jul 01, 2008
'Mind's eye' influences visual perception
A graphic depiction of the sequence of events in the experiment from top left to bottom right. First, a person looks at a blank screen and imagines a green pattern. Next, she puts on the red-green glasses and looks at a screen with two superimposed patterns: one green and one red. The green pattern is visible to one eye and the red image is visible to the other eye. The longer she has spent imagining the green pattern, the more likely it is that she will see the green pattern, demonstrating that what people imagine can influence what they see later in time. Credit: Joel Pearson

Letting your imagination run away with you may actually influence how you see the world. New research from Vanderbilt University has found that mental imagery—what we see with the "mind's eye"—directly impacts our visual perception.

The research was published online June 26 by the journal Current Biology in a paper titled, "The Functional Impact of Mental Imagery on Conscious Perception."

"We found that imagery leads to a short-term memory trace that can bias future perception," says Joel Pearson, research associate in the Vanderbilt Department of Psychology. and lead author of the study. "This is the first research to definitively show that imagining something changes vision both while you are imagining it and later on."

"These findings are important because they suggest a potential mechanism by which top-down expectations or recollections of previous experiences might shape perception itself," Pearson and his co-authors write.

It is well known that a powerful perceptual experience can change the way a person sees things later. Just think of what can happen if you discover an unwanted pest in your kitchen, such as a mouse. Suddenly you see mice in every dust ball and dark corner—or think you do. Is it possible that imagining something, just once, might also change how you perceive things?

"You might think you need to imagine something 10 times or 100 times before it has an impact," says Frank Tong, associate professor of psychology and co-author of the study. "Our results show that even a single instance of imagery can tilt how you see the world one way or another, dramatically, if the conditions are right."

To test how imagery affects perception, Pearson, Tong and co-author Colin Clifford of the University of Sydney had subjects imagine simple patterns of vertical or horizontal stripes, which are strongly represented in the primary visual areas of the brain. They then presented a green horizontal grated pattern to one eye and a red vertical grated pattern to the other to induce what is called binocular rivalry. During binocular rivalry, an individual will often alternately perceive each stimulus, with the images appearing to switch back and forth before their eyes. The subjects generally reported they had seen the image they had been imagining, proving the researcher's hypothesis that imagery would influence the binocular rivalry battle.

Additional experiments found that the effect of imagery on perception was approximately the same as showing the research subject a faint representation of one of the patterns between trials. Stronger shifts in perception were found if subjects either viewed or imagined a particular pattern for longer periods of time. They found that both imagery and perception can lead to a build-up of a "perceptual trace" that influences subsequent perception.

Pearson, Clifford and Tong also discovered that changing the orientation of the image from what had been imagined greatly reduced the impact of imagery on perception. Because orientation is processed in early visual areas, this suggests that imagery's interaction with perception may occur at early stages of visual processing.

The new findings offer an objective tool to assess the often-slippery concept of imagination.

"It has been very hard to pin down in the laboratory what exactly someone is experiencing when it comes to imagery, because it is so subjective," Tong says. "We found that the imagery effect, while found in all of our subjects, could differ a lot in strength across subjects. So this might give us a metric to measure the strength of mental imagery in individuals and how that imagery may influence perception."

The findings may also help settle a longstanding debate in the research community over whether mental imagery is visual—that one imagines something just as one sees it—or more abstract.

"More recently, with advances in human brain imaging, we now know that when you imagine something parts of the visual brain do light up and you see activity there," Pearson says. "So there's more and more evidence suggesting that there is a huge overlap between mental imagery and seeing the same thing. Our work shows that not only are imagery and vision related, but imagery directly influences what we see."

Source: Vanderbilt University

Explore further: Sheepdogs use just two simple rules to round up large herds of sheep

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

AR glasses are proposed to restore depth perception

Jan 27, 2013

(Phys.org)—People with impaired depth perception might see better with augmented reality glasses according to a research initiative under way at the University of Yamanashi in Japan. The team involved are ...

A new way to visualize Earth

Feb 17, 2012

As the state geologist for Arizona, Lee Allison knows granite from sandstone, a syncline from an anticline. But he has lacked the ability to look through rocks to visualize the inner workings of the Earth.

The incomplete art of brand imagery

May 16, 2011

The visual power of a brand can be the first breakthrough companies make with their customers. But efforts to artistically manipulate the typeface of a corporate logo can backfire for firms, according to a ...

Recommended for you

Walking fish reveal how our ancestors evolved onto land

35 minutes ago

About 400 million years ago a group of fish began exploring land and evolved into tetrapods – today's amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. But just how these ancient fish used their fishy bodies and ...

The roots of human altruism

2 hours ago

Scientists have long been searching for the factor that determines why humans often behave so selflessly. It was known that humans share this tendency with species of small Latin American primates of the ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

x646d63
3 / 5 (2) Jul 01, 2008
It's always nice to see science demonstrating what should be plainly obvious to everyone.

Human perception is 100% bias. We are taught to see what we see and hear what we hear. Although much of what we are taught is "objective," i.e., it is what it is to everything, not just humans, much of what we are taught is highly biased, so it should be taught that we are biased so that we may actually open our minds a little bit. But we're always so invested in "fact" that it's hard to get away from.

I hope they controlled for ocular dominance in this study. If they always showed the green on the right, and always asked people to visualize green beforehand, the results would be suspect since most people (66% or so) are right-eye dominant.
makotech222
1 / 5 (2) Jul 01, 2008
^^yeah a waste of scientific money if u ask me.
yuri
not rated yet Jul 01, 2008
This experiment doesn't sound like a very direct validation of their hypothesis, all they are proving by it is that by imagining a certain color, a person's brain will pick that color for the object that is displayed in both eyes. Maybe if they projected a different image to both eyes and the person saw the one closer to the one he was imagining, but this experiment is just not very logical. Which color will that person see if he didn't imagine anything at all? red or blue? dumb
RobL
4 / 5 (1) Jul 01, 2008
I figured this out when i ingested LSD. one perception does not exist.
aussiecarter
2.5 / 5 (2) Jul 01, 2008
Imagination is the key to creation
ZeroDelta
5 / 5 (1) Jul 01, 2008
Neural cognitive science is cool. Binocular rivalry..perceptual traces...I recommend zen.
JohnStifter
5 / 5 (1) Jul 04, 2008
Dream in the quantum cathedral