Constrained future brightening of solar radiation in China and its implication for solar power

However, projections of Rs based on contain large uncertainties due to internal climate variability, model uncertainty, and scenario , which have not been eliminated by previous studies. Moreover, the model biases in Rs and the underlying drivers have yet to be quantified.

By integrating the high-quality observations and the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) model data of Rs, a research team led by Prof. Kun Yang (Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University) has explored the model bias of CMIP6 models in Rs and quantified the physical causes of the model bias in China. The systematic bias in Rs in CMIP6 models is revealed to be caused by clouds and aerosols, resulting in largely uncertain projections for future changes in Rs.

To correct this effect, the team used historical biases of models to constrain the future projections of Rs under three possible future scenarios based on emergent constraints, an approach with a solid physical basis for narrowing the uncertainties of future climate projections through the combination of an ensemble of climate simulations with contemporary measurements.

The research is published in the journal National Science Review.

The constrained results substantially reduce the projection uncertainties by about 56% in the mid-21st century. Moreover, the team found that the constraints using the combined effect of the TCC and Rs-clear biases can account for about 81% of the projection uncertainties using R.

Spatial patterns of multi-year mean biases in (a) surface downward solar radiation (Rs, in W•m-2), (b) total cloud cover fraction (TCC, in %) and (c) clear-sky surface downward solar radiation (Rs-clear, in W•m-2) of the CMIP6 MMM against the ground-based observations averaged from 1961 to 2014. Photo credit: Yanyi He and Kun Yang. Credit: Science China Press

(a) The relationship between the future Rs during 2050-2069 in SSP1-2.6 (a low-emission scenario) and the historical bias in Rs during 1961-2014 for the 24 models. (b) Comparisons of raw and constrained projections of Rs in SSP1-2.6. Rs projections are constrained by the historical bias in Rs (red bars) and the historical bias in TCC and Rs-clear, respectively (blue bars). Photo credit: Yanyi He and Kun Yang. Credit: Science China Press

Future changes (shading; in W•m-2) in the 20-year mean of Rs during 2050-2069 relative to the 1995-2014 mean from constrained values in three possible future scenarios, i.e., SSP1-2.6 (a), SSP2-4.5 (b) and SSP5-8.5 (c), with the 66% confidence interval shown as contour. Photo credit: Yanyi He and Kun Yang. Credit: Science China Press