Brain splits to handle two jobs at once

Apr 16, 2010 by Lin Edwards report
Image credit: Etienne Koechlin, INSERM-ENS

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research has shown that the brain handles two tasks at once by dedicating half the brain to one task, and the other half to the second. This means it may not be able to effectively handle more than two complicated tasks simultaneously.

The medial frontal cortex is a part of the front of the brain above the eyes, and is thought to control the pursuit of rewards for successfully carrying out a task. Scientists at the National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) in Paris wondered what happens when a person is asked to do two jobs at once. To find out, they used (fMRI) to monitor the of 16 male and 16 female volunteers, all aged 19 to 32, and all right-handed, as they simultaneously performed two related tasks. The volunteers were offered a monetary reward that reduced if they made errors.

The tasks were to match upper case letters and to match lower case letters, switching back and forth between the two tasks. Rewards for each task were calculated separately and depended on the numbers matched without error. The researchers, neuroscientists Sylvain Charron and Etienne Koechlin, found that when the volunteers tackled only one task, both halves of the medial frontal cortex worked on it, but when they tackled both tasks simultaneously, the left side of the frontal cortex corresponded to one of the tasks and the right side corresponded to the other, with the two sides working independently. Results improved as the monetary reward increased, and there was no significant difference in the results of the men and women volunteers.

Professor Koechlin said the results suggest the could only effectively handle two tasks simultaneously because it has only two hemispheres. To test this, the scientists took a further 16 volunteers and added a third task to the previous two: matching letters of the same color. This group consistently forgot one of the three jobs, and also made triple the errors of the dual-tasking subjects. This means that, as Koechlin explained, if you try to tackle three jobs at once, the will always neglect one of them.

The research paper was published online in the April 15 issue of Science. The findings could have practical applications in areas in which people routinely multi-task, such as air traffic control, and in neurological conditions in which the ability to multi-task is lost.

Explore further: Slow walking speed and memory complaints can predict dementia (w/ Video)

More information: Divided Representation of Concurrent Goals in the Human Frontal Lobes, Science 16 April 2010: Vol. 328. no. 5976, pp. 360 - 363. DOI:10.1126/science.1183614

Related Stories

Neural bottleneck found that thwarts multi-tasking

Jan 18, 2007

Many people think they can safely drive while talking on their cell phones. Vanderbilt neuroscientists Paul E. Dux and René Marois have found that when it comes to handling two things at once, your brain, ...

Stroke study sheds light on left-right brain divide

Jun 11, 2007

Research into the effects of strokes has furthered our understanding of the different roles of the left and right sides of our brains. A study led by the University of Exeter has highlighted differences in the ability of ...

Training can improve multitasking ability

Aug 20, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Training increases brain processing speed and improves our ability to multitask, new research from Vanderbilt University indicates.

Lost In Thought: Brain Research

May 17, 2006

Can one literally "lose oneself" in an experience? Many theoretical models of the mind reject this notion, proposing that awareness is dependent on the mediation of areas involved in self representation – ...

Recommended for you

Faster fish thanks to nMLF neurons

14 hours ago

As we walk along a street, we can stroll at a leisurely pace, walk quickly, or run. The various leg movements needed to do this are controlled by special neuron bundles in the spinal cord. It is not quite ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Arthur_Zombie
4.5 / 5 (2) Apr 16, 2010
Without examining the actual study, it seems as though the researcher's conclusions are a bit premeditated.

Why test using only letters? Why not shapes, or a temporally extended audio sequence?
Neodim
5 / 5 (1) Apr 16, 2010
In extreme situations probably and number of problems there is more. The brain can allocate other sites for the decision of urgent problems. But it is very difficult for checking up - extreme situations difficult to create in laboratory.
Hunnter
not rated yet Apr 17, 2010
32 people can't define even 5% of the human race. Everybody is uniquely different in the way they think.
They should extend it, such as shapes and numbers as Arthur_Zombie mentioned.
Remembering a sequence of numbers is harder on the brain since it usually has no meaning, whereas spelling APPLE is pretty simple.

The term "Task" is blurry at best. How would you define a task?
How about rubbing your belly while tapping your head, as well as speaking to someone and walking?
Bartenders have to deal with multiple voices coming in all over the place while filtering out background noise and actually implementing the orders.
I could go on.

These 32 individuals might struggle with multitasking.
Some people struggle at doing two tasks at once, sometimes, ONE task.

The brain is flexible. Saying that it can't re-arrange itself to optimize for multitasking is quite silly.
So far, the only noticeable downside from personal experience is that logical computation tends to be less capable.