Label for first homoeopathic product may be illegal, warns senior scientist

Jun 10, 2009

The labelling for the first homoeopathic product to get a licence from the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should be illegal, because they breach Unfair Trading regulations, argues a senior scientist today.

In a letter published in this week's BMJ, Professor David Colquhoun from University College London says the MHRA "has made a mockery of its own aims" by allowing Arnica 30C pills to be labelled "a homoeopathic medicinal product used with the homoeopathic tradition for the symptomatic relief of sprains, muscular aches, and bruising or swelling after contusions."

This label should be illegal, he says, because the pills contain no trace of the ingredient on the label, but this deceit has been allowed through a legal loophole for a long time now. He points out that if you sold strawberry jam that contained not a trace of strawberry you'd be in trouble.

But he can see no such loophole that allows manufacturers of Arnica 30C to evade the consumer protection laws which ban "falsely claiming that a product is able to cure illnesses" and which apply to the way that "the average consumer" will interpret the label.

The average consumer is unlikely to know that "used with the homoeopathic tradition" is a form of weasel words that actually means "there isn't a jot of evidence that the medicine works," he writes.

Since there is not the slightest evidence that Arnica 30C pills provide symptomatic relief of sprains, etc, the labelling that the MHRA has approved seems to be illegal, he concludes.

In a second letter, Professor Stephen Evans from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine believes that the MHRA could have resisted granting a licence because there is "good evidence against any efficacy."

This fiasco, he says, takes us back to the days before drug regulation was introduced, partly to prevent hazards of snake oil-type remedies. And he warns that this product "may have major indirect harms - not only in individual patients who may not get benefit from the other effective remedies but also in a general sense by undermining the rational basis for medicine."

In a final letter, Nicholas Moore, a clinical pharmacologist at the University of Bordeaux, says that "giving homoeopathy credit for any kind of demonstrable efficacy is ludicrous."

But he suggests that homoeopathy might be useful as "a truly inactive placebo" for over-treated illnesses such as the common cold and insomnia. This "will not alter the course of the disease. But the patient will feel better, which is one of the aims of medicine's art, if not its science," he writes.

Source: BMJ-British Medical Journal

Explore further: Clinical trial of Auxilium's Xiaflex shows it to be effective in smoothing cellulite

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New evidence for homeopathy

Nov 03, 2008

Two new studies conclude that a review which claimed that homeopathy is just a placebo, published in The Lancet, was seriously flawed.

Caution: Lose more than weight with imported diet pills

Jan 26, 2009

Americans who use illegal diet pills from South America are taking amphetamines without knowing it and seriously risking both their health and their jobs. Physicians need to be made aware of the range of serious side effects ...

Recommended for you

Using computers to design drugs

4 hours ago

Designing a new medicine is an expensive and time consuming business. Typically it takes around $2 billion and ten years for a new drug to move from its initial design in the lab, to the clinic. All the ...

Lilly psoriasis drug fares well in late-stage test

9 hours ago

Drugmaker Eli Lilly and Co. said its potential psoriasis treatment fared better than both a fake drug and a competitor's product during late-stage testing on patients with the most common form of the skin disease.

New US restrictions on painkiller to take effect

22 hours ago

The federal government is finalizing new restrictions on hundreds of medicines containing hydrocodone, the highly addictive painkiller that has grown into the most widely prescribed drug in the U.S.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Ashy
3 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2009
Medicals, make the research and you will see real Arnica effect. What? You don't want it? It is clear you are afraid of results. You are know that babys and animals could be treat successfully by homoeopathic products. It's not placebo, isn't it?
Sepp
not rated yet Jun 10, 2009
It should be clear even to the most obtuse medical "authority" that homeopathic remedies do not pretend to contain the actual molecules of the starting substance. They work because they have been homeopathically diluted until there are only traces or not even those of the actual substance. They work on the information principle. But then - information seems to be a scarce thing in mainstream medicine.

If a law was made to allow registration of homeopathic medicinal products, how can it then be illegal to make one? Come on. Pharma isn't the only game in town!
Nan2
not rated yet Jun 11, 2009
Tens, if not hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars are thrown into a black hole of the 'supplemental' health products sold without standards or oversight. Many come from overseas sources using core ingredients which are murky and certainly not standard or vetted. Some of these are nothing more than snake oil, some are actually dangerous.

As people are encouraged to self-diagnose and treat, these products can provide the 'appearance' of improvement on the placebo effect to an individual while either masking or even worsening a serious underlying condition. People seeking to treat themselves for serious conditions often worsen to cause increased costs and a worsened outlook, when early intervention could have produced a far better result for the patient and cheaper expenditures for their care.

The FDA and other oversight agencies have failed their mandates to serve in the public interest. Today they seek more power while their failures remain minimized, their staffing minimized and the invasion of profit interests circumventing research and affecting even research initiatives.

It is a sad state of affairs. Buyer beware in both markets. Someone please tell me why pharmaceuticals cannot be produced with oversight and standards of not only the mfg process but inclusive of core ingredients within our borders.

Public distrust is the result of a badly broken health system. Good job. Profits aren't evil but a 450% profit for a sole source medication in a hospital setting is obscene. That is but one example of tactics which didn't create a competitive free market but bankrupted a captured one.