Going outside -- even in the cold -- improves memory, attention

Dec 16, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Go outside: It helps improve your focus—even when it's cold out. University of Michigan psychology research in the December issue of Psychological Science explored the cognitive benefits of interacting with nature and found that walking in a park in any season, or even viewing pictures of nature, can help improve memory and attention.

U-M psychology researchers Marc Berman, John Jonides and Stephen Kaplan found memory performance and attention spans improved by 20 percent after people spent an hour interacting with nature.

Researchers believe the findings could have broader impact on helping people who may be suffering from mental fatigue.

"Interacting with nature can have similar effects as meditating," Berman said. "People don't have to enjoy the walk to get the benefits. We found the same benefits when it was 80 degrees and sunny over the summer as when the temperatures dropped to 25 degrees in January. The only difference was that participants enjoyed the walks more in the spring and summer than in the dead of winter."

Kaplan and his wife, Rachel Kaplan, a researcher in psychology and the School of Natural Resources and Environment, argue that people are far more likely to be satisfied with their lives when their environment supports three basic needs: the ability to understand and explore; to feel they make a difference; and to feel competent and effective.

Berman decided to test that theory by sending study participants on walking routes around Ann Arbor. Participants walked on an urban route down main streets and also on a route in U-M's Matthaei Botanical Gardens and Nichols Arboretum, taking in nature. When participants walked in the Arboretum, they improved their short-term memory by 20 percent, but showed no improvements after walking down city streets.

The researchers also tested the same theory by having subjects sit inside and look at pictures of either downtown scenes or nature scenes and again the results were the same: when looking at photos of nature, memory and attention scores improved by about 20 percent, but not when viewing the urban pictures.

Provided by University of Michigan

Explore further: Treating ill health might not be enough to help homeless people get off the streets

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Pigeons and people play the odds when rewards are higher

Oct 22, 2014

(Phys.org) —If you were weighing the risks, would you choose to receive a guaranteed $100, or take a 50/50 chance of winning either $200 or nothing? Researchers at the University of Alberta have shown that ...

From eons to seconds, proteins exploit the same forces

Aug 12, 2014

(Phys.org) —Nature's artistic and engineering skills are evident in proteins, life's robust molecular machines. Scientists at Rice University have now employed their unique theories to show how the interplay ...

StoreDot has plans for 30-second battery charge

Apr 08, 2014

(Phys.org) —You heard it last month, last week and most probably will hear the same message tomorrow: battery-bothered ordinary citizens wish that the best and brightest in labs could just take their hands ...

Why dogs are the new darlings of cognitive science

May 23, 2014

This will be his earliest memory. Red light, morning light. High ceiling canted overhead. Lazy click of toenails on wood. Between the honey-colored slats of the crib a whiskery muzzle slides forward until it ...

Recommended for you

Study reveals state of crisis in Canadian foster care system

2 hours ago

A new study of foster care in Canada led by a researcher at Western University reveals a shrinking number of foster care providers are available across the country to care for a growing number of children with increasingly ...

Researchers prove the benefits of persimmons for diet

4 hours ago

Alba Mir and Ana Domingo, researchers from the Department of Analytical Chemistry of the University of Valencia, under the supervision of professors Miguel de la Guardia and Maria Luisa Cervera, from the same department, ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

moj85
3.5 / 5 (2) Dec 16, 2008
perhaps the increased-attention effect of outside 'smoke breaks' is simply an effect of going outside?
kerry
3.3 / 5 (3) Dec 16, 2008
I'd like to (unscientifically) confirm this based on personal experience. I get a lot more homework done when I'm studying outside than when I'm indoors.
Suzu
3.3 / 5 (3) Dec 16, 2008
This is true, I get a lot more attentive and clear when I walk outside. Also my imagination takes a huge lvl up.
Hungry4info2
3.3 / 5 (3) Dec 16, 2008
I'll throw in my own little pseudoconfirmation.

I, too, think better outside.
Mauricio
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 16, 2008
"Interacting with nature can have similar effects as meditating," = this is not true, absolutely not true...

However, I do know that going outside into natural settings is beneficial for many psychological processes.
gmurphy
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 17, 2008
if I'm stuck on a particularly uncooperative programming problem, I find that going for a long walk in the countryside facilitates the emergence of the solution.
fleem
3 / 5 (2) Dec 17, 2008
Although its been pretty common knowledge for a long time, its still wonderful to see it proven. I'm taking more walks! Also, there's more room to pace and talk to yourself.
twango
not rated yet Dec 17, 2008
Beethoven got good results from long nature walks. So did Niels Bohr.

Nature helps keep us grounded in reality. I 'spect it's hardwired.
rfw
not rated yet Dec 21, 2008
Natural settings are rich with fractal patterning. Does exposure to 'pure' graphic fractals have a similar effect? Also, it is interesting that walks don't seem to parse differently than sitting. Does cross-crawl activity of motion change affect the effect?