Salinity-gradient-power cell's surprisingly high voltage gives it best cost-per-watt of its kind

Jul 30, 2014 by Lisa Zyga feature
(a) Concentration cell with Zn electrodes and (b) concentration cell with Ag/AgCl electrodes. In experiments, the ions can diffuse through a porous diaphragm (filter paper) between the two cells. A liquid junction develops between the cells and actively converts the free mixing energy into electrostatic energy. Credit: Marino, et al. ©2014 AIP Publishing

Several different methods exist for generating electricity from the mixing of salt water and fresh water, which is also called salinity gradient power (SGP). One method uses concentration cells, in which two semi-cells separated by a porous diaphragm such as filter paper are filled with solutions of different ion concentrations. However, concentration cells are not as popular as other SGP techniques because they don't perform as well, typically generating only half the voltage of other methods.

So a team of scientists from Italy was very surprised to find that, when substituting a zinc chloride solution for the sodium chloride solution that is typically used, concentration cells generate a voltage that is up to 150% higher than any other SGP technique, including reverse electrodialysis. Even though the device is only at the proof-of-principle stage, it already offers the lowest cost per watt (0.5 euro [$0.67 USD] / Watt) among all SGP devices.

The researchers, M. Marino, L. Misuri, and D. Brogioli at the University of Milan Bicocca in Monza, Italy; and A. Carati at the University of Milan in Milano, Italy, have published their paper on the new concentration cells in a recent issue of Applied Physics Letters.

The researchers explain that the performance improvement arises because the new cell greatly decreases the loss that would otherwise occur. Usually, ion diffusion across the porous diaphragm results in a continuous loss of free energy. However, the new cell converts this free energy into electrical energy due to its use of zinc ions.

With the use of zinc ions instead of sodium ions, there is a larger difference in diffusion speed between ions, causing a giant liquid junction potential to develop across the diaphragm. This means that, when zinc ions diffuse across the diaphragm, they generate a beneficial current that drags chlorine ions along with them against the electrostatic force. In other words, the diffusion of zinc pumps additional chlorine ions "uphill," which converts this free energy into electrical energy.

A comparison of the voltages of the new cell with zinc electrodes (blue squares) and a cell with silver electrodes (green circles). The voltage of the zinc cell is more than 1.5 times larger than the reversible voltage, which is represented by the solid black line, at 80% concentration. This result is surprising because the voltage of any concentration cell is usually much lower than the voltage of the reversible electrochemical SGPs. Credit: Marino, et al. ©2014 AIP Publishing

"The novelty is that the liquid junction is not simply a trivial transition between solutions, and it still hides surprises," Brogioli told Phys.org. "It actively converts the free mixing energy into electrostatic energy: this idea is nearly unbelievable.

"We just separate the two solutions at different concentrations with a 'porous diaphragm'—nothing else than a filter paper sheet, and a (relatively) high voltage is produced. In the first experiment, I replaced an ion-exchange membrane, with a cost of 100 euros per square meter, with a piece of a paper tablecloth. Unexpectedly, the power output increased."

As Brogioli explains, the technological applications are evident.

"The zinc chloride solutions at different concentrations are not naturally available, but they can be artificially produced by means of solar distillation: it's a way to exploit the solar energy," he said. "The solar light is easily collected in the form of heat with an efficiency more than 90%, by means of the vacuum tubes with selective absorber coating; it's a mature and cheap technology. The heat can be used for distilling solutions of zinc chloride that are stored in reservoirs. When needed, the solutions flow through the SGP cell and get mixed, while an electrical current is generated.

"Other heat sources, e.g., industrial waste heat, can also be exploited; other applications include the co-generation, i.e., the combined heat and power generation with saving of fuel."

At its peak, the concentration cell's voltage currently reaches a value of more than 1.5 times that of other SGP techniques. The researchers hope that further improvements can be obtained by, for example, reducing the distance between the electrodes and using nanostructured electrodes.

"First of all, we plan to build a big version of our cm-sized laboratory cell," Brogioli said. "The design is too easy to delay any more. Then we will build a stand-alone heat-to-current converter delivering a power of the order of 10 W.

"But the study will not be limited to zinc chloride. Many solutes form complexes between each other: we plan to study ternary systems, with two solutes in a solvent, which could even enhance the power production."

Explore further: Protons power protein portal to push zinc out of cells

More information: M. Marino, et al. "Boosting the voltage of a salinity-gradient-power electrochemical cell by means of complex-forming solutions." Applied Physics Letters, 105, 033901 (2014). DOI: 10.1063/1.4890976

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Renewable Energy Made by Mixing Salt and Fresh Water

Sep 02, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- When a river flows into the sea, the location is more than just a haven for water commerce. The mixing of fresh and salt water that occurs at an estuary also dissipates energy, as the different ...

Protons power protein portal to push zinc out of cells

Jun 22, 2014

Researchers at The Johns Hopkins University report they have deciphered the inner workings of a protein called YiiP that prevents the lethal buildup of zinc inside bacteria. They say understanding YiiP's ...

Graphene battery demonstrated to power an LED

Mar 16, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists in Hong Kong have reported, in ArXiv, their experiments to make a graphene battery that they say generates an electrical current by drawing on the ambient thermal energy in the sol ...

Recommended for you

Preparing for a zero-emission urban bus system

5 hours ago

In order to create a competitive and sustainable transport system, the EU must look to alternative fuels to replace or complement petrol and diesel. Not only will this reduce transport emissions but it will ...

Exploring the value of 'Energy Star' homes

5 hours ago

The numbers in neat columns tell—column by column, page by page—a story spread out across Carmen Carrión-Flores' desk at Binghamton University. It's a great story, she says; she just doesn't know how ...

Toward a networked energy future

Oct 29, 2014

February 1, 2050, is a good day for German electricity consumers. The breeze off the north coast is blowing so strongly that offshore wind farms and the wind turbines on land are running non-stop. Since it's ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

duggo
not rated yet Jul 30, 2014
.
brunnegd1
not rated yet Jul 30, 2014
What is the energy density?
HTD
not rated yet Jul 31, 2014
"Even though the device is only at the proof-of-principle stage, it already offers the lowest cost per watt (0.5 euro [$0.67 USD] / Watt) among all SGP devices." Is this cost correct or was it supposed to mean "the lowest cost per KILOwatt"?
dfgriggs
not rated yet Aug 01, 2014
Impressive! Ms. Zyga, I wondered at this phrase, "concentration cells generate a voltage that is up to 150% higher than any other SGP technique" since my (very possibly incorrect) reading of the solid black line shows a voltage of around 175 mv, and the blue squares ending in around 275 mv. So I wondered if "1.5 times" had accidentally gotten misquoted as "150% higher" rather than "50% higher." I'm a layman and may well not be understanding correctly.
dfgriggs
5 / 5 (1) Aug 01, 2014
"Even though the device is only at the proof-of-principle stage, it already offers the lowest cost per watt (0.5 euro [$0.67 USD] / Watt) among all SGP devices." Is this cost correct or was it supposed to mean "the lowest cost per KILOwatt"?


To HTD:
I suspect that it's correct as written. I think they are quoting the price of the device itself -- not the estimated amortized cost of a watt HOURS (or kilowatt hours) over time. By analogy, one might quote a cost per watt to buy a 6000 watt gasoline generator (price / 6000) which is different from the cost of watthours delivered by the generator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.