US births down for 3rd year; economy may be factor

June 15, 2011 By MIKE STOBBE , AP Medical Writer

(AP) -- U.S. births apparently have declined for a third year in a row, probably because of the weak economy.

Births had been on the rise for years, and the number hit an all-time high of more than 4.3 million in 2007.

But the count has been dropping since then. Last year, it fell 3 percent to slightly more than 4 million births, according to preliminary figures released Wednesday by the .

It's possible the decline is leveling off: The falling birth rate seemed to bottom out in October, November and December. However, it's too early to say whether that marks an end to the trend, said Paul Sutton, a demographer who was the report's lead author.

The report is a first glimpse at 2010 births from state health departments. It doesn't include an actual review of certificates or specifics about what's going on in different groups of women. The CDC plans to do more analysis later.

However, the number usually is pretty close to the final statistics, officials said.

Experts believe the downward trend is tied to the economy, which officially was in a from December 2007 until June 2009 and is still flagging. The theory is that women who are unemployed or have other money problems feel they can't afford to start a family or add to it.

In 2008 and 2009, the only increase in births was in women older than 40 - considered more sensitive to the ticking of their biological clocks.

A drop in immigration to the United States, blamed on the weak job market, may be another factor in last year's decline.

" have higher ," explained Dr. Roger Rochat, an Emory University researcher who has studied fertility and abortion trends.

More information: CDC report: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs

©2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
Jun 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"The theory is that women who are unemployed or have other money problems feel they can't afford to start a family or add to it." - article

How can this be, when the state has been 1.5 trillion dollars generous this time around and when Libertarians are constantly telling me that welfare and jobless benefits cause the vermin - who are deserving only of extinction - to breed uncontrollably?

Can someone explain this discontinuity between reality and the Libertarian perspective?

emsquared
Jun 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Can someone explain this discontinuity between reality and the Libertarian perspective?

I think part of the problem here is that the article's statement: "...women who are unemployed or have other money problems feel they can't afford to start a family or add to it."
... is patently false.

It's well known and studied that the reproductive rates of those in the impoverished and lower-levels of education categories are significantly higher than those of the more affluent or higher-levels of education categories.

http://en.wikiped...lligence

I doubt this recession has changed that.

So if it was demonstrable that welfare and jobless benefits perpetuate poverty and poor education (which I don't believe it is), only then would the Libertarians be correct.
emsquared
Jun 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I should amend the above, the article isn't equating "women who are unemployed or have other money problems" to poverty or lack of education in so many words, so I can't really site that trend relevant to your question.

However, I think my assertion still stands that the idea that "welfare and jobless benefits cause the vermin - who are deserving only of extinction - to breed uncontrollably" would only be accurate if welfare and jobless benefits were proven to perpetuate poverty and poor education.

But to answer your question, VD, there likely is no discontinuity in the Libertarians mind because they likely equate welfare and jobless benefits to perpetuators of poverty.

And the only reality ultimately proven above is that a poor economy pushes down birthrates. Independent of the macro-economic trends, I suspect women "who have money problems" probably generally have higher reproductive rates.
Rank not rated yet
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Medicine & Health / Health

created 15 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Color-changing contact lenses to help diabetics (w/ Video)

For the millions of Americans with diabetes, the inconvenient and often painful method of testing blood sugar levels is a way of life. But research and innovative product design by scientists at The University of Akron may ...

Medicine & Health / Diabetes

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (7) | comments 4 | with audio podcast

Missouri opts for untested drug for executions

(AP) -- The same anesthetic that caused the overdose death of pop star Michael Jackson is now the drug of choice for executions in Missouri, causing a stir among critics who question how the state can guarantee ...

Medicine & Health / Medications

created May 24, 2012 | popularity not rated yet | comments 4

Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments

A team of scientists at McMaster University has discovered a drug, thioridazine, successfully kills cancer stem cells in the human while avoiding the toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments.

Medicine & Health / Cancer

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (40) | comments 3 | with audio podcast

Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast feature


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...