'Can you hear me now?' Researchers detail how neurons decide how to transmit information

Mar 25, 2011
Inhibitory circuits in the olfactory bulb use a novel, time-scale dependent strategy to mediate how neurons choose between encoding and propagating information. Credit: Sonya Giridhar

There are billions of neurons in the brain and at any given time tens of thousands of these neurons might be trying to send signals to one another. Much like a person trying to be heard by his friend across a crowded room, neurons must figure out the best way to get their message heard above the din.

Researchers from the Center for the of Cognition, a joint program between Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh, have found two ways that accomplish this, establishing a fundamental mechanism by which neurons communicate. The findings have been published in an online early edition of (PNAS).

"Neurons face a universal communications conundrum. They can speak together and be heard far and wide, or they can speak individually and say more. Both are important. We wanted to find out how neurons choose between these strategies," said Nathan Urban, the Dr. Frederick A. Schwertz Distinguish Professor of Life Sciences and head of the Department of Biological Sciences at CMU.

Neurons communicate by sending out called action potentials or "spikes." These spikes code information much like a version of Morse code with only dots and no dashes. Groups of neurons can choose to communicate information in one of two ways: by spiking simultaneously or by spiking separately.

To find out how the brain decided which method to use to process a , the researchers looked at mitral cell neurons in the brain's olfactory bulb — the part of the brain that sorts out smells and a common model for studying global information processing. Using slice electrophysiology and computer simulations, the researchers found that the brain had a clever strategy for ensuring that the neurons' message was being heard.

Over the short time scale of a few milliseconds, the brain engaged its inhibitory circuitry to make the neurons fire in synchrony. This simultaneous, correlated firing creates a loud, but simple, signal. The effect was much like a crowd at a sporting event chanting, "Let's go team!" Over short time intervals, individual neurons produced the same short message, increasing the effectiveness with which activity was transmitted to other areas. The researchers say that in both human and neuronal communication alike, this collective communication works well for simple messages, but not for longer or more complex messages that contain more intricate information.

The neurons studied used longer timescales (around one second) to convey these more complex concepts. Over longer time intervals, the inhibitory circuitry generated a form of competition between neurons, so that the more strongly activated neurons silenced the activity of weakly activated neurons, enhancing the differences in their firing rates and making their activity less correlated. Each neuron was able to communicate a different piece of information about the stimulus without being drowned out by the chatter of competing neurons. It would be like being in a group where each person spoke in turn. The room would be much quieter than a sports arena and the immediate audience would be able to listen and learn much more complex information.

Researchers believe that the findings can be applied beyond the olfactory system to other neural systems, and perhaps even be used in other biological systems.

"Across biology, from genetics to ecology, systems must simultaneously complete multiple functions. The solution we found in neuroscience can be applied to other systems to try to understand how they manage competing demands," Urban said.

Explore further: How nerve cells communicate with each other over long distances

More information: doi:10.1073/pnas.1015165108

Related Stories

New brain cells listen before they talk

Oct 30, 2007

Newly created neurons in adults rely on signals from distant brain regions to regulate their maturation and survival before they can communicate with existing neighboring cells—a finding that has important implications ...

Neuronal diversity makes a difference, study says

Aug 29, 2010

Much like snowflakes, no two neurons are exactly alike. But it's not the size or shape that sets one neuron apart from another, it's the way it responds to incoming stimuli. Carnegie Mellon University researchers ...

Brain encodes complex plumes of odors with a simple code

Feb 25, 2009

In the real world, odors don't happen one puff at a time. Animals move through, and subsequently distort, plumes of odor molecules that constantly drift, changing direction as the wind disperses them. Now, ...

Researchers find 'switch' for brain's pleasure pathway

Mar 22, 2006

Amid reports that a drug used to treat Parkinson's disease has caused some patients to become addicted to gambling and sex, University of Pittsburgh researchers have published a study that sheds light on what may have gone ...

Recommended for you

Why your favourite song takes you down memory lane

Aug 28, 2014

Music triggers different functions of the brain, which helps explain why listening to a song you like might be enjoyable but a favourite song may plunge you into nostalgia, scientists said on Thursday.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of brain boosts memory

Aug 28, 2014

Stimulating a particular region in the brain via non-invasive delivery of electrical current using magnetic pulses, called Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, improves memory, reports a new Northwestern Medicine ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Tachyon8491
1 / 5 (1) Mar 25, 2011
Now all we still need is to get away from epiphenomenalism, a la Chalmers: "As after all, we can see all the information processing occuring without the need to experience;" and Dennet, whose integrated fractal robotics makes individuated consciousness enslave to exogenous determinism and "random" quantum fluctuations.

The origin of individuated consciousness, a la David Bohm's quantum consciousness in the addition of the quantum potential term to the Schrodinger equation, applies not just at the level of complex organicity, but from quanta in the microdomain upwards.

Consciousness does not "emerge" at some level of organicity - it is cosmically present at different levels of integrative complexity.

I explain this fully in my 550-page thesis of CQD, Cosmogonic Quantization Dynamics, in my work, "The Nature of Being," 176 illustrations, 2700+ index entries - on de-stress-refuge.com

FV
PinkElephant
4 / 5 (1) Mar 25, 2011
@Tachyon8491,

Neurons are far too large and complex, and their environment far too noisy and warm, for them to exhibit any quantum behavior. Never even mind entire networks of neurons. The physics and chemistry of neuronal cell membrane potential maintenance, integration of stimuli, generation and propagation of action potentials, and electrochemical signalling across synaptic gaps, are quite well understood. None of these MECHANISMS have any quantum aspects of any note.

Human consciousness DOES "emerge at some level of organicity". If you doubt that, give yourself a brain injury and see what happens. Or if you want to be less drastic, just take some psychotropic drugs. Or, have someone conk you over the head with a cudgel, and see what happens to your consciousness.