Collecting your thoughts: You can do it in your sleep!
(PhysOrg.com) -- It is one thing to learn a new piece of information, such as a new phone number or a new word, but quite another to get your brain to file it away so it is available when you need it.
A new study published in the Journal of Neuroscience by researchers at the University of York and Harvard Medical School suggests that sleep may help to do both.
The scientists found that sleep helps people to remember a newly learned word and incorporate new vocabulary into their "mental lexicon".
During the study, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, researchers taught volunteers new words in the evening, followed by an immediate test. The volunteers slept overnight in the laboratory while their brain activity was recorded using an electroencephalogram, or EEG. A test the following morning revealed that they could remember more words than they did immediately after learning them, and they could recognise them faster demonstrating that sleep had strengthened the new memories.
This did not occur in a control group of volunteers who were trained in the morning and re-tested in the evening, with no sleep in between. An examination of the sleep volunteers' brainwaves showed that deep sleep (slow-wave sleep) rather than rapid eye movement (REM) sleep or light sleep helped in strengthening the new memories.
When the researchers examined whether the new words had been integrated with existing knowledge in the mental lexicon, they discovered the involvement of a different type of activity in the sleeping brain. Sleep spindles are brief but intense bursts of brain activity that reflect information transfer between different memory stores in the brain -- the hippocampus deep in the brain and the neocortex, the surface of the brain.
Memories in the hippocampus are stored separately from other memories, while memories in the neocortex are connected to other knowledge. Volunteers who experienced more sleep spindles overnight were more successful in connecting the new words to the rest of the words in their mental lexicon, suggesting that the new words were communicated from the hippocampus to the neocortex during sleep.
Co-author of the paper, Professor Gareth Gaskell, of the University of York's Department of Psychology, said: "We suspected from previous work that sleep had a role to play in the reorganisation of new memories, but this is the first time we've really been able to observe it in action, and understand the importance of spindle activity in the process."
These results highlight the importance of sleep and the underlying brain processes for expanding vocabulary. But the same principles are likely to apply to other types of learning.
Lead author, Dr Jakke Tamminen, said: "New memories are only really useful if you can connect them to information you already know. Imagine a game of chess, and being told that the rule governing the movement of a specific piece has just changed. That new information is only useful to you once you can modify your game strategy, the knowledge of how the other pieces move, and how to respond to your opponent's moves. Our study identifies the brain activity during sleep that organizes new memories and makes those vital connections with existing knowledge."
More information: The paper Sleep spindle activity is associated with the integration of new memories and existing knowledge is published in the Journal of Neuroscience at link http://www.jneuros … /30/43/14356
Provided by University of York
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Every black hole contains a new universe: A physicist presents a solution to present-day cosmic mysteries,
217 comments
-
New silicon memory chip developed,
16 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
A question about drug tolerance
May 23, 2012
-
Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
May 23, 2012
-
Math and dyslexia?
May 21, 2012
-
portable metabolism meter?
May 21, 2012
-
Rare medical conditions on 20/20 tonight
May 18, 2012
-
"Good" Cholesterol in Doubt
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Skp2 activates cancer-promoting, glucose-processing Akt
HER2 and its epidermal growth factor receptor cousins mobilize a specialized protein to activate a major player in cancer development and sugar metabolism, scientists report in the May 25 issue of Cell.
8 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease
For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...
6 hours ago |
1 / 5 (1) |
0
|
Cancer may require simpler genetic mutations than previously thought
Chromosomal deletions in DNA often involve just one of two gene copies inherited from either parent. But scientists haven't known how a deletion in one gene from one parent, called a "hemizygous" deletion, can contribute ...
12 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
First study to suggest that the immune system may protect against Alzheimer's changes in humans
Recent work in mice suggested that the immune system is involved in removing beta-amyloid, the main Alzheimer's-causing substance in the brain. Researchers have now shown for the first time that this may apply in humans.
Medicine & Health / Alzheimer's disease & dementia
13 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
0
|
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
High-speed method to aid search for solar energy storage catalysts
Eons ago, nature solved the problem of converting solar energy to fuels by inventing the process of photosynthesis.
It's in the genes: Research pinpoints how plants know when to flower
Scientists believe they've pinpointed the last crucial piece of the 80-year-old puzzle of how plants "know" when to flower.
Researchers solve structure of human protein critical for silencing genes
In a study published in the journal Cell on May 24, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) scientists describe the three-dimensional atomic structure of a human protein bound to a piece of RNA that "guides" the pr ...
MIT researchers devise new means to synchronize a group of robots (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- For several years, roboticists have been working out ways to get a group of robots to perform synchronized activities as demonstrated most often in dance routines. Its not just about trying ...
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (11)
Without a brain, the senses are useless since there's nothing to process the information. In fact there's nothing to connect the sensor to. Having a brain first means that those sensors need to be interfaced to the brain later.
How does the brain know how to process the information coming in from those sensors?
And what about the nerves that connect the sensors to the brain? did that evolve separately too? All by itself, just randomly, with no purpose in sight - pun intended.
The only way it could work would be for everything to be in place at once, otherwise the creature would be severely handicapped to the point of extinction.
Evolution on that kind of scale would be simply miraculous. Fabulous. Marvelous. Impossible.
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Which came first kev, the wheel or the axle? A car couldn't exist with jsut an axle and no wheel, nor could it exist with a wheel and no axle. But when we look back in technology we see that the two came into existence together, as a rounded log. Then our technology evolved where the "log' construct was subdivided over time, yielding a fully formed and dependent axle/wheel system.
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
There are flatworms that don't have a brain, but have "eyes" and nervous systems. There are jelly fish that have a "brain" but no "eyes", and then there are creatures that have both eyes and a brain. The senses, and the various tools, (like the ear, eyes, nose, touonge, etc), did not arise independently. Evolution is an emergent phenominon. Wrap your head around the majoesty of reality, rather than the majesty of a creator for once and recognize that everything works as a system based on fundamental laws. 1)The longer you survive, the greater the chance you have for reproduction. 2) Organisms change in small ways over time. 3) any adaptation that increases the chance of survival, increases the chance of said adaptation appearing in the subsequent generation.
These are the rules of evolution.
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Your logic is somewhat lacking in credibility Skeptic - you are taking examples from what we KNOW to have been designed and equating that to evolutionary processes. The two just don't gel and you know it.
Strange to say, but you guys who cling so tightly to evolution need to be prodded into revising your thoughts now and again.
@Royale, you do realize that you're putting your faith in the religion of evolution, don't you? As jjoensuu said: what is reasonable? It actually takes MORE faith to believe in the miracles of evolution than it does to believe in a creator. At least the creator is capable of thought, planning, invention and construction. You credit NOTHING to have those same capabilities. I'd much rather believe in a creator than NOTHING.
I'd like to throw back your challenge : start thinking critically about what it is you believe in.
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
never watched a unicellular lifeform under a microscope,like a paramecium? just use the interweb!
no eyes no nerves no brain and no problem - surely marvelous, surely fabulous,
but impossible - nope!
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
You suggest that evolutionists start thinking critically about what they believe in. The theory of evolution is based on critical thinking.
Observations in nature were/are made, hypotheses were/are being made, tests are done to check these hypotheses and conclusions are made based on these tests.
Evolutionists are always looking for evidence to further their knowledge of evolution/how we came to be. If the theory changes based on evidence, so what? Then the theory changes and people move on making and testing hypotheses to further our understanding.
Your "critical thinking" actually looks for no evidence at all. You take what you can't (or don't try to) understand as impossible for any human to ever understand. Then you make the illogical leap that, because something cannot be understood by man, that God must have made it so.
And what is this based on? A collection of stories by humans over the last few thousand years.
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 03, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Can you enlighten us what is this incredible molecule, and what exactly cant be explained...I am just curious.
Nov 03, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 08, 2010
Rank: not rated yet