Neural mechanisms of abstract learning

April 28, 2010

A new study provides intriguing insight into the way that humans approach novel situations. The research, published in the April 29 issue of the journal Neuron, reveals neural mechanisms that underlie our remarkable ability to discover abstract cognitive relationships when dealing with new problems.

It is clear that explicit prior experience is often not required for success in novel situations. For example, we can rapidly work out an unusual mechanism for completing a task, such as opening a door by pulling a rope rather than turning a knob, even without prior experience using that particular mechanism. "This type of ability depends on the discovery of abstract relationships between context and action that are not dependent on a concrete one-to-one mapping between a stimulus and response," explains study coauthor, Dr. David Badre from the Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences at Brown University.

Although it is well established that the frontal cortex supports concrete rule learning, the that underlie acquisition of abstract rules are not as clear. "There is some evidence that the frontal cortex might be organized in a front to back (known as "rostro-caudal") hierarchy in which neurons located in the anterior region of the frontal cortex process progressively more abstract representations," says coauthor Dr. Andrew Kayser from the Department of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco.

To test this hypothesis, the researchers used (fMRI) to study participants during two learning tasks, one concrete and one that provided study participants with an opportunity to acquire an abstract rule. "We found that more anterior regions along the rostro-caudal axis of the frontal cortex supported rule learning at higher levels of abstraction," says Dr. Badre.

Based on their observations, the authors suggest that when encountering a novel situation, we may search for relationships between context and action at multiple levels of abstraction simultaneously, a capability that may underlie our remarkable behavioral adaptability and our capacity to generalize our past to new problems. "How we address novel problems in reasoning, decision-making, and selecting action under uncertainty may very well reflect both the adaptability and the constraints conferred by the basic functional organization of the ," concludes Dr. Kayser.

Explore further: Stroke study sheds light on left-right brain divide

More information: D’Esposito et al.: “Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules.” Publishing in Neuron 66, 315-326, April 29, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.025

Related Stories

Stroke study sheds light on left-right brain divide

June 11, 2007

Research into the effects of strokes has furthered our understanding of the different roles of the left and right sides of our brains. A study led by the University of Exeter has highlighted differences in the ability of ...

The choice is ours

April 2, 2008

The option to choose among several courses of action is often associated with the feeling of being in control. Yet, in certain situations, one may prefer to decline such agency and instead leave the choice to someone else ...

Brain mechanisms for behavioral flexibility

April 15, 2009

New research provides insight into how the brain can execute different actions in response to the same stimulus. The study, published by Cell Press in the April 16 issue of the journal Neuron, suggests that information from ...

Neural mechanism supports survival in an uncertain world

June 10, 2009

A new study uncovers a pivotal role for the human frontal lobe in the promotion of behavioral flexibility during voluntary choice. The work, published by Cell Press in journal Neuron, presents a critical new neural mechanism ...

Brain splits to handle two jobs at once

April 16, 2010

( -- New research has shown that the brain handles two tasks at once by dedicating half the brain to one task, and the other half to the second. This means it may not be able to effectively handle more than two ...

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Cow embryos reveal new type of chromosome chimera

May 27, 2016

I've often wondered what happens between the time an egg is fertilized and the time the ball of cells that it becomes nestles into the uterine lining. It's a period that we know very little about, a black box of developmental ...

Shaving time to test antidotes for nerve agents

February 29, 2016

Imagine you wanted to know how much energy it took to bike up a mountain, but couldn't finish the ride to the peak yourself. So, to get the total energy required, you and a team of friends strap energy meters to your bikes ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 29, 2010
This has always seemed obvious to me. Neural mechanisms benefit not from having specific data on novel situations, but from a large accumulation of basic contextual relationships. This plays a large role in the way we process language, for instance, and in the way we piece together information from fuzzy data. Consider the poem Jabberwocky. In the absence of specific data we gradually generalize the context until a statistically significant pattern can be deduced.

Hire me. I'll make you rich.
not rated yet Apr 29, 2010
This mechanism accounts for creativity and invention. We tend to think of these as unique attributes, but they are really just manifestations of extra or over-developed capabilities that exist in all of us. Understanding this mechanism, if it lead to enhanced or artificial capabilities for innovation, would have a profound impact on our society.
not rated yet Apr 30, 2010
i'd imagine it can also account for delusion and failed logic. if you misinterpret causality vs correlation, via influence of another trusted individual, ignorance, or plain willingness to do so for some personal gain (i.e. prolonged substance abuse), the deductions you make can become corrupted and false, thus leading to more misinterpretation, etc. i lean toward thinking the act of misinterpreting correlation as causality fosters this degradation.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.