Can we trust the results of research done on children?

Can we trust the results of research done on children?

Flawed could lead to children receiving treatment that either doesn't work or is harmful.

Lisa Hartling, co-director for the University of Alberta's Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, looked at 163 North American involving children by using a new tool that rates the risk of bias, meaning the benefits and safety of the treatments may have been exaggerated. She found that 96 per cent of the trials have either an unclear or high risk of bias. This means children could be receiving treatments that either don't work or are harmful. It could also mean are not receiving treatment that may help.

In a paper recently published in the Hartling says some faulty research factors contributing to bias include selective reporting, inappropriate influence by the study sponsor or missing data.

Hartling and her colleagues are using their study results as part of an international effort to develop guidelines on improving child-related research.

Citation: Can we trust the results of research done on children? (2010, January 11) retrieved 10 May 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2010-01-results-children.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Few studies consider the appropriate measurements for assessing clinical trials in children

 shares

Feedback to editors