Combination heart device reduced heart failure

September 1, 2009 By MARIA CHENG , AP Medical Writer

(AP) -- A two-in-one heart device to fix irregular beats and contraction patterns cut patients' chances of developing heart failure by 41 percent, new research says.

While the device spared many patients from going to the hospital, it made no difference in saving lives, and some doctors say they won't rush to implant more patients with the pricey devices.

The study compared patients who got a to correct abnormal heart rhythms with patients who got a device that added a heart resynchronization device, which helps the lower chambers of the at the same time.

The results were announced Tuesday at the European Society for Cardiology meeting in Barcelona and published online in the .

The defibrillator and resynchronization devices are commonly used in patients with serious , and doctors wondered if patients with mild illness might benefit.

"The answer is a clear, unequivocal yes," said Arthur Moss, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York, and the study's lead author.

Not everyone agreed. Douglas Zipes of the Indiana School of Medicine and a past president of the American College of Cardiology said too many patients were already getting the devices and that doctors needed to rethink who should get them.

Moss' study tracked more than 1,800 patients with mild heart disease in North America and Europe for more than four years. About half of the patients got a defibrillator, while the other half got a defibrillator plus a resynchronization device. The two implants are nearly identical, except the resynchronization device has an extra electrode that stimulates the left side of the heart.

Overall, patients who got the combined device had a 41 percent lower chance of developing heart failure, though women's chances dropped by 63 percent. The death rate in both device groups was about the same, around 3 percent.

The study was paid for by Boston Scientific Corp., which makes the devices.

In the U.S., about 60,000 patients with severe heart disease get the devices every year, out of more than 5 million people who have heart failure.

Some doctors thought the device's price - it sells for approximately $30,000 to $40,000, not including the cost of implantation - would be a major stumbling block to its acceptance. Patients with mild heart failure, who were not experiencing any painful symptoms, might also be reluctant to have surgery to get the device.

Clyde Yancy, president of the American Heart Association called it an "incremental (improvement), not a breakthrough." Yancy was not linked to the research.

Others agreed the study wouldn't immediately affect how heart failure patients are treated.

"Previous devices have shown us that it takes time to consider benefits for real-world populations," said Alfred Bove, president of the American College of Cardiology in a statement. "Even if costs were not a factor, we still do not have enough information to expand treatment right away."

On the Net:

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: New heart failure device is tested

Related Stories

New heart failure device is tested

October 17, 2006

Physicians at 50 U.S. medical facilities are taking part in a multinational clinical trial of a device designed to help heart failure victims.

Company warns of heart device malfunctions

October 15, 2007

Implanted heart device manufacturer Medtronic of Minneapolis is asking doctors to discontinue use of a component in its newest defibrillator models.

New therapy found to prevent heart failure

June 23, 2009

A landmark study has successfully demonstrated a 29 percent reduction in heart failure or death in patients with heart disease who received an implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy device with defibrillator (CRT-D) ...

Study shows experimental drug cuts stroke risk

August 30, 2009

(AP) -- An experimental drug reduces the stroke risk in patients with irregular heartbeats by more than three times, compared with the popular drug warfarin - but possibly at a cost, according to new research released Sunday.

Recommended for you

How the finch changes its tune

August 3, 2015

Like top musicians, songbirds train from a young age to weed out errors and trim variability from their songs, ultimately becoming consistent and reliable performers. But as with human musicians, even the best are not machines. ...

Cow embryos reveal new type of chromosome chimera

May 27, 2016

I've often wondered what happens between the time an egg is fertilized and the time the ball of cells that it becomes nestles into the uterine lining. It's a period that we know very little about, a black box of developmental ...

Shaving time to test antidotes for nerve agents

February 29, 2016

Imagine you wanted to know how much energy it took to bike up a mountain, but couldn't finish the ride to the peak yourself. So, to get the total energy required, you and a team of friends strap energy meters to your bikes ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.