Adult circumcision reduces risk of HIV transmission without reducing sexual pleasure

Apr 26, 2009

Two studies presented at the 104th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) show that adult circumcision reduces the risk of contracting the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the risk of coital injury—without reducing pleasure or causing sexual dysfunction.

The first study, by researchers in Australia, shows that the inner foreskin has the largest concentration of Langerhans' cells, which are the initial cellular targets in the sexual transmission of HIV. After analyzing biopsy samples from 10 uncircumcised and 10 circumcised men, researchers found that the inner foreskin has a significantly higher density of Langerhans' cells than other areas of the foreskin. By removing the inner foreskin, circumcision removes the skin surface which is most susceptible to , reducing not eliminating the risk of contracting HIV. No differences were found in epithelial or keratin thickness between the remnant foreskin, inner foreskin or shaft skin.

The second study, by researchers in Seattle, WA; Chicago, IL; Winnepeg, Canada; Research Triangle, NC; and Kisumu, Kenya, shows that circumcised men had a significantly lower risk for coital injuries (bleeding, scratches, cuts, abrasions or "getting sore") compared to uncircumcised men and that there was no difference in sexual function between circumcised and uncircumcised men. Researchers divided 2,784 patients from Kisumu, Kenya into two groups: a control group and a group to be circumcised within 30 days of randomization. Detailed evaluations were done at one, three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months after circumcision. Results show that there was no difference in sexual function between the two groups and that the circumcised group reported fewer coital injuries.

"These are important reports which support the concepts that circumcision does not interfere with sexual function and that circumcision is an important element of HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa," said Ira D. Sharlip, MD, an AUA spokesman. "At the same time, it should be emphasized that circumcision must be combined with other techniques of HIV prevention, such as safe sex and voluntary testing. It is not sufficient to rely on alone to prevent transmission."

Source: American Urological Association

Explore further: CDC examines prevalence of undiagnosed HIV

Related Stories

Recommended for you

CDC examines prevalence of undiagnosed HIV

12 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Many people have undiagnosed HIV, with the prevalence varying by geographic area, according to a report published in the June 26 issue of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's ...

Potential new HIV therapy seen in immune cells

Jun 29, 2015

A research team led by Weill Cornell Medical College scientists has discovered a way to limit replication of the most common form of HIV at a key moment when the infection is just starting to develop. The ...

More secondary schooling reduces HIV risk

Jun 29, 2015

Longer secondary schooling substantially reduces the risk of HIV infection—especially for girls—and could be a very cost-effective way to halt the spread of the virus, according to researchers from Harvard ...

Bill Gates hopeful of AIDS vaccine in 10 years

Jun 26, 2015

Billionaire and philanthropist Bill Gates, who spends millions of dollars on AIDS drug development, said Friday he hoped for a vaccine against the disease within the next decade as a cure remains far off.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mauricio
not rated yet Apr 27, 2009
Women need to be circumcised. We can research for the positive effects in few generations from now. Who knows, it might help them to live longer, prevent cancer, or spend less batteries for vibrators (then it would bring "ecological advantages").
Hugh7
not rated yet Apr 28, 2009
A Dutch study found Langerhans cells have an important immunological function. The claim that they attract HIV is based on a few, small, very shaky studies. We should be very suspicious of studies claiming circumcision has health benefits because it has been a "cure" looking for a disease for centuries; circumcised men are desperate to find justification for their condition. The Kisumu study was of paid volunteers who wanted to be circumcised and wanted to please the researchers. And NB "sexual function" does not equal sexual pleasure.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.