We've just had the hottest 5 years on record: U.N. Science group says time to face reality on climate
The report, "United in Science," includes details on the state of the climate and presents trends in the emissions and atmospheric concentrations of the main greenhouse gases. It highlights the urgency of fundamental socio-economic transformation in key sectors such as land use and energy in order to avert dangerous global temperature increase with potentially irreversible impacts. It also examines tools to support both mitigation and adaptation.
"The report provides a unified assessment of the state of our Earth system under the increasing influence of anthropogenic climate change, of humanity's response thus far and of the far-reaching changes that science projects for our global climate in the future. The scientific data and findings presented in the report represent the very latest authoritative information on these topics," said the Science Advisory Group to the UN Secretary-General's Climate Action Summit.
"It highlights the urgent need for the development of concrete actions that halt global warming and the worst effects of climate change."
The Science Advisory Group is co-chaired by WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas and Leena Srivastava, former Vice Chancellor of TERI School of Advanced Studies. It comprises highly recognized and respected natural and social scientists, with expertise in different aspects of climate change, including on mitigation and adaptation.
The report, which was coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization, aims to present a "transparent envelope" of authoritative and actionable cutting-edge science.
The synthesis report consists of short summaries from contributing agencies: the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Global Atmosphere Watch, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Global Carbon Project, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Future Earth, Earth League and the Global Framework for Climate Services. The synthesis is complemented by longer, individual reports, presented as a package to a high-level science event on 22 September and then to world leaders at the Climate Action Summit on 23 September.
Warmest five-year period on record
The average global temperature for 2015–2019 is on track to be the warmest of any equivalent period on record. It is currently estimated to be 1.1°Celsius (± 0.1°C) above pre-industrial (1850–1900) times. Widespread and long-lasting heatwaves, record-breaking fires and other devastating events such as tropical cyclones, floods and drought have had major impacts on socio-economic development and the environment.
Continued decrease of sea ice and ice mass
Arctic summer sea-ice extent has declined at a rate of approximately 12 percent per decade during 1979-2018. The four lowest values for winter sea-ice extent occurred between 2015 and 2019.
Overall, the amount of ice lost annually from the Antarctic ice sheet increased at least six-fold between 1979 and 2017. Glacier mass loss for 2015-2019 is the highest for any five-year period on record
Sea-level rise is accelerating, sea water is becoming more acidic
The observed rate of global mean sea-level rise accelerated from 3.04 millimeters per year (mm/yr) during the period 1997–2006 to approximately 4mm/yr during the period 2007–2016. This is due to the increased rate of ocean warming and melting of the Greenland and West Antarctica ice sheets. There has been an overall increase of 26 percent in ocean acidity since the beginning of the industrial era.
Record Greenhouse Gas Concentrations in the Atmosphere
Levels of the main long-lived greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4)) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have reached new highs.
The last time Earth's atmosphere contained 400 parts per million CO2 was about 3-5 million years ago, when global mean surface temperatures were 2-3°C warmer than today, ice sheets in Greenland and West Antarctica melted, parts of East Antarctica ice had retreated, all causing global see level rise of 10-20m compared with today.
In 2018, global CO2 concentration was 407.8 parts per million (ppm), 2.2 ppm higher than 2017. Preliminary data from a subset of greenhouse gas monitoring sites for 2019 indicate that CO2 concentrations are on track to reach or even exceed 410 parts per million (ppm) by the end of 2019.
In 2017, globally averaged atmospheric concentrations of CO2 were 405.6 ±0.1 ppm, CH4) at 1859 ±2 parts per billion (ppb) and N2O at 329.9 ±0.1 ppb. These values constitute, respectively, 146 percent, 257 percent and 122 percent of pre-industrial levels (pre-1750).
The growth rate of CO2 averaged over three consecutive decades (1985–1995, 1995–2005 and 2005–2015) increased from 1.42 ppm/yr to 1.86 ppm/yr and to 2.06 ppm/yr.
Global Carbon Budget
Carbon dioxide emissions grew 2 percent and reached a record high of 37 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2018. There is still no sign of a peak in global emissions, even though they are growing slower than the global economy.
Current economic and energy trends suggest that emissions will be at least as high in 2019 as in 2018. Global GDP is expected to grow at 3.2 percent in 2019, and if the global economy decarbonized at the same rate as in the last 10 years, that would still lead to an increase in global emissions.
Despite extraordinary growth in renewable fuels over the past decade, the global energy system is still dominated by fossil fuel sources. The annual increase in global energy use is greater than the increase in renewable energy, meaning the fossil fuel use continues to grow. This growth needs to halt immediately.
The net-zero emissions needed to stabilize the climate requires both an acceleration in use of non-carbon energy sources and a rapid decline in the global share of fossil fuels in the energy mix. This dual requirement illustrates the scale of the challenge.
Natural CO2 sinks, such as vegetation and oceans, which remove about half of all emissions from human activities, will become less efficient at doing so. This underscores the need to reduce deforestation and expand natural CO2 sinks, particularly those in forests and soils that can be improved by better management and habitat restoration.
The emissions gap—where we are and where we need to be
The UNEP Emissions Gap Reports, with the tenth edition being published this November, assess the latest scientific studies on current and estimated future greenhouse gas emissions; they compare these with the emission levels permissible for the world to progress on a least-cost pathway to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. This difference between "where we are likely to be and where we need to be" is known as the emissions gap.
Global emissions are not estimated to peak by 2030, let alone by 2020, if current climate policies and ambition levels of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are maintained. Preliminary findings from the Emissions Gap Report 2019 indicate that greenhouse gas emissions continued to rise in 2018.
The emissions gap in 2030 between emission levels under full implementation of conditional Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and levels consistent with least-cost pathways to the 2°C target is 13 GtCO2e. If just the unconditional NDCs are implemented, the gap increases to 15 GtCO2e. The gap in the case of the 1.5°C target is 29 GtCO2e and 32 GtCO2e respectively.
Current NDCs are estimated to lower global emissions in 2030 by up to 6 GtCO2e compared to a continuation of current policies. This level of ambition needs to be roughly tripled to align with the 2°C limit and must be increased around fivefold to align with the 1.5°C limit.
Implementing unconditional NDCs, and assuming that climate action continues consistently throughout the twenty-first century, would lead to a global mean temperature rise between 2.9°C and 3.4°C by 2100 relative to pre-industrial levels.
If NDC ambitions are not increased immediately and backed up by action, exceeding the 1.5°C goal can no longer be avoided. If the emissions gap is not closed by 2030, it is very plausible that the goal of a well-below 2°C temperature increase is also out of reach.
A substantial part of the technical potential can be realized through scaling up and replicating existing, well-proven policies—such as switching to renewable energy and reforestation—that simultaneously contribute to key sustainable development goals.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Three IPCC Special Reports released in 2018 and 2019 assess complementary and specific aspects of climate change, ahead of the Sixth Assessment Report.
The Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C states that limiting warming to 1.5ºC is not physically impossible but would require unprecedented transitions in all aspects of society. There are clear benefits to keeping warming to 1.5 ºC compared to 2 ºC or higher. Every bit of warming matters.
Limiting warming to 1.5ºC can go hand in hand with reaching other world goals such as achieving sustainable development and eradicating poverty.
The Special Report on Climate Change and Land stressed that land is already under growing human pressure and climate change is adding to these pressures. At the same time, keeping global warming to well below 2ºC can be achieved only by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors including land and food.
"The report shows that better land management can contribute to tackling climate change, but land is not the only solution. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors including energy is essential if global warming is to be kept as close as possible to 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels."
On 25 September 2019, the IPCC is due to release the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.
Consolidated evidence reinforces human influence as the dominant cause of changes to the Earth system, in a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene.
Growing climate impacts increase the risks of crossing critical tipping points.
These refer to thresholds that, if crossed, lead to far-reaching, in some cases abrupt and/or irreversible changes.
There is a growing recognition that climate impacts are hitting harder and sooner than climate assessments indicated even a decade ago.
As climate change intensifies, cities are particularly vulnerable to impacts such as heat stress and can play a key role in reducing emissions locally and globally.
Strategies for mitigation and for upscaling adaptive risk management are necessary going forward. Neither is adequate in isolation given the pace of climate change and magnitude of its impacts.
Only immediate and all-inclusive action encompassing: deep de-carbonization complemented by ambitious policy measures, protection and enhancement of carbon sinks and biodiversity, and efforts to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, will enable us to meet the Paris Agreement.
Professor Samantha Hepburn is the research director of the law school at Deakin University in Melbourne and is also the Director of the Centre for Energy and Natural Resource Law (CENRL). "The gap between global warming targets and reality is a direct consequence of the failure of world nations to adhere to their climate targets in a committed manner by implementing and enforcing robust, focused mandates for decarbonizing, particularly in the energy sector because fossil fuel electricity is one of the most carbon intensive activities. There is nothing to gain by setting targets and ignoring them but, in the most profound way, humanity has everything to lose. The reality of climate change and it's devastating effects will haunt the leaders who had the capacity to act in a meaningful way and not only refused to do so, obfuscated the matter by setting targets they had no intention of meeting."
Professor Mark Howden is director of the ANU Climate Change Institute at The Australian National University. "Global and national greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase in spite of the commitments under the Paris Agreement. Every year that this happens reduces the likelihood of being able to keep global temperatures below 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius. Every year of high emissions commits us to future climate changes, sea level rise and ocean acidification and the high costs that these will incur. There are major opportunities to be had in Australia leading constructive and ethical actions that reduce emissions and adapt to unavoidable climate changes and hence reduce unwanted climate impacts. Australia would be well placed to generate new, high value industries and to transfer our knowledge and build capacity in our region. But our efforts are, at best, fragmented and slow."
Ian Lowe is Emeritus professor of science, technology and society at Griffith University, Qld and former President of the Australian Conservation Foundation. "The report, United in Science, is an urgent wake-up call to world leaders assembling for the UN Climate Summit in New York. Global emissions of greenhouse gases need to peak by 2020 to keep the increase in average global temperatures below two degrees, but current policies will certainly not achieve that. In fact, this report warns that emissions appear unlikely to peak by 2030. We are on track for an alarming acceleration of climate change, with average temperatures increasing this century by three degrees or more. As the report says, the current level of ambition needs to be increased by a factor of between three and five to avoid catastrophic impacts.
It is a clear reminder that proposals to develop new thermal coal mines or expand gas production are criminally irresponsible. Our leaders should accept the three demands of the striking students—no new fossil fuel projects, a goal of 100 percent renewables by 2030 and political commitment to a just transition for those whose livelihoods will be affected by the measures we now need to adopt urgently to avert disastrous consequences."
Dr. Jon Symons is a senior lecturer in Politics and International Relations at Macquarie University. "The "United in Science' report reveals that there is a vast gap between rhetoric and action around climate change.
Collectively, G20 countries are not on track to meet the commitments made under the Paris agreement. However, the Paris targets are themselves hopelessly inadequate. Even if fully implemented, global emissions would actually be higher in 2030 than today.
If we are to limit warming to 1.5°C, global emissions need to halve in each of the coming decades. Instead, emissions are increasing. In 2018, fossil CO2 emissions increased by 2 percent as global consumption of coal, oil and gas all increased.
The report stresses that "limiting warming to 1.5°C is not physically impossible" but would "require unprecedented transitions in all aspects of society."
The consequences of projected climate change for fire risk, sea-level rise and extreme weather events are already becoming apparent. Temperature increases in cities outpace the global average, so heatwaves and adverse economic impacts, particularly in the developing world, are expected to be severe.
Australia's political debate seems entirely disconnected from the scientific realities captured in the "United in Science' report. It is not only that the Morrison Government lacks effective mitigation policies, it is failing to honor even some of its key promises. For example, it is not fulfilling its 2015 "Mission Innovation" pledge to double government spending on clean energy research and development by 2020.
Meanwhile, the urgent need to develop negative emissions technologies has not yet entered mainstream debate. If current trends continue we may soon also be debating more drastic and risky interventions. For example, calls to stabilize the global temperature (or to protect specific areas such as the Great Barrier Reef) through 'solar geoengineering' may grow louder."
Dr. Liz Hanna is chair of the Environmental Health Working Group for the World Federation of Public Health Associations and an Honorary Senior Fellow in the Climate Change Institute at the Australian National University. "I cannot understand why so many steadfastly ignore the climate scientists and warnings from the world's major health expert groups.
Working for years in Intensive Care Units has taught me that people want to live. They want their families to live, their friends and neighbors to live. But for some unfathomable reason, it would appear that en masse, humanity simply doesn't care if it lives or dies, survives or not.
Instead of reducing emissions, the world has done an about-turn, and is ramping up CO2 emissions driving climate change and accelerating warming and sea level rise. So, despite mountains of solid scientific evidence, warnings of the unfolding crisis, pleas from the world's children, humanity is racing towards its own doom.
Even if all nations met their non-binding Paris pledges, the resultant 3.4C warming would make most of the world uninhabitable. Extreme heatwaves, hotter than now, lasting for months, exceeds human heat tolerance. Most of humanity and all our lifestyle will not survive this heat.
Wild storms, floods and sea level rise will render billions homeless. In the dry lands, extreme water stress would desiccate plants, and subject them to fires.
World hunger is already rising, agricultural crop yields will become insufficient to feed the world, and too expensive for most to purchase. Extreme competition for resources will escalate conflict. The future will not be pretty.
It is nonsensical for humanity to behave like suicidal lemmings, when as individuals, we cherish life, and the lives of our loved ones."
Dr. Pep Canadell is executive director of the Global Carbon Project, chief research scientist at the CSIRO Climate Science Centre and a contributing author of the United in Science Report. "This new assessment is another sobering reminder of the critical state of the climate crisis and a call on governments, businesses and civic society to act more determined and aggressively in reducing greenhouse gases emissions.
Nothing in this report should come as a surprise but a confirmation of the trends well established by the scientific community, with a distinctive acceleration of climate changes in the past three decades, and particularly in the most recent one.
How many climate records does it take to accept the unprecedented nature of what we are living and to act upon it?"
Provided by World Meteorological Organization