Bad roads reduce trade volumes by 18%

Bad roads reduce trade volumes by 18%
Distance versus travel time in intra- and international bilateral links. Notes: Average excess distance is the %-ratio between road distance and great circle distance, both in km. Avg. road speed denotes the average travel speed on the fastest road connection, in km/h, while avg. direct speed refers to the average theoretical speed on the most direct (= great circle distance), in km/h. Credit: Gabriel J.Felbermayr et al, Journal of Urban Economics (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2022.103473

Economists from HSE University and the Vienna University of Economics and Business have figured out why, with all else being equal, trading goods across borders can be more expensive than trading the same goods within state borders. They argue that one of the reasons is underdeveloped infrastructure in border regions. Their study was published in the Journal of Urban Economics.

Developed countries spend approximately 3% of their budgets on maintaining and expanding their , while developing countries sometimes spend even moreā€”up to 10% of their budgets. Studies show that the cost of transporting goods, the volumes of trade, and as a result, a region's economic well-being, largely depend on the condition of the roads. However, the quality of infrastructure and the speed and cost of transporting goods differ from region to region. In particular, the quality of roads in areas substantially differs from that in interior regions of a country.

In their study, the authors examined data on distances between 220 cities in Europe using three measures: the formal "straight-line" distance (whether or not such a direct road actually exists); the road distance, taking into account the fact that people and goods travel over existing roads of adequate quality; and the .

The first measure is always less than the second one, and sometimes much less, when suitable roads are not always available and drivers must make detours. The showed that the road distance between the cities within a country is appreciably less than between cities of different countries having the same straight-line distance between them. In particular, within countries, the road distance between two cities is, on average, 9% higher than the straight-line distance. However, if these cities are located in different countries, this difference increases to 30%. Travel times also differ significantly, with cross-border travel taking 28% longer than domestic travel of the same distance.

Alexander Tarasov, HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences associate professor and co-author of the study, noted, "Empirical studies show that the volumes of trade between regions in different countries are substantially lower than those between 'identical' regions within one country. This is the so-called 'border effect.' It cannot be explained only by customs regulations. For instance, it takes place in Europe, where the borders are open. In some cases, it is even observed in trade within a country, when inter-regional trade is lower than that within a region, other things being equal."

The researchers tried to explain the above differences assuming that the government in each country optimally invests in the and that there is no international coordination of the investment. As a result, a country spends more on roads connecting the interior regions of the country than on cross-border highways and roads. To some extent, this is the well-known "free-rider problem," where each country counts on the other when investing in border regions. This, in turn, increases the distance and travel time between locations in different countries and thus becomes an additional barrier to international trade. It is worth noting that even in such a region as the European Union, almost all funds for road maintenance are allocated at the state level. Centrally, at the EU level, only a handful of projects are planned, and they account for only about 1% of all infrastructure spending.

The developed model also made it possible to quantify the average effect of the underinvestment in transport infrastructure on the volumes of international trade. In particular, it has been shown that underinvestment in transport infrastructure in border regions increases the "border effect" by 21%. This, in turn, increases the cost of cross-border transportation, and according to the estimates, reduces its volume by 18% on average.

"Increasing investment in cross-border transport infrastructure requires international coordination," Alexander Tarasov summed up. "Without it, countries will naturally invest less than is necessary, and this will affect the time, cost, and volume of trading."

More information: Gabriel J. Felbermayr et al, Trade and the spatial distribution of transport infrastructure, Journal of Urban Economics (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2022.103473

Provided by National Research University Higher School of Economics

Citation: Bad roads reduce trade volumes by 18% (2022, October 4) retrieved 21 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

What if carbon border taxes applied to all carbon, and fossil fuels, too?


Feedback to editors