New research uncovers favoritism in order assignment

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

An elusive behavior long overlooked by social scientists is order determination: In many types of competitions, the ranking of contestants is affected by the order in which they are evaluated, so placing a preferred contestant in a favorable spot in the order is a subtle way to boost their chances.

A recent paper in Economic Inquiry generates of detecting this behavior and applies them to numerous contests, including in Texas and West Virginia. There, law requires the order that candidates are placed on the ballot to be randomly determined, but often this did not happen.

"In those elections, randomness was violated in many different ways," said author Darren Grant, Ph.D., an economics professor at Sam Houston State University. "Figuring out the reasons why was like being in a mystery novel. It often came down to some minor detail I had long overlooked."

In contrast, Grant found no violations of randomness in the TV show American Idol or in Powerball lottery drawings. "The thread connecting these three very different situations is that things are done in an order," said Grant. "So many things in life are like that. This research has wide applicability."

More information: Darren Grant, Uncovering bias in order assignment, Economic Inquiry (2022). DOI: 10.1111/ecin.13114

Provided by Wiley

Citation: New research uncovers favoritism in order assignment (2022, August 17) retrieved 1 December 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Seattle democracy vouchers increase donations, number of candidates in city elections


Feedback to editors