Value placed on resources and decisions in farming in Ethiopia differs across genders, study reveals

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

A new study published in CABI Agriculture & Bioscience has revealed that major empowerment resources and decision-makings that are valuable to men and women vary across gender and farming systems in Ethiopia.

Lead author Wole Kinati, from the University of New England, Australia, and fellow researchers found that, although, major decisions related to livestock and crop are valued by both genders, agency dimensions related to decisions on and are not equally valued by groups across study areas implying the role of context.

Women place a greater importance on autonomous decisions about social relations which the men did not; men, on the other hand, valued financial related decisions which the women in turn did not.

Regarding resources, psychological well-being was found to be one of the most important resources, for women as well as men.

Assessment of the basic psychological needs―autonomy, self-acceptance, and positive relations―statistically yielded no significant differences between the gender groups.

However, the effects of location and the intersection of location with gender were both found to be statistically significant, suggesting that being men and from Horo is associated with higher scores on and personal relation subscales.

Mr Kinati says that "women's empowerment constitutes an important aspect of the development agenda. Although it is highly contextual in nature, empowerment literature so far has focussed on identifying factors associated with empowerment, neglecting the importance of understanding which empowerment resources and agency dimensions are more important for whom and under what contexts."

"This is important, because we cannot talk of empowerment for those who are not in a disempowered condition or who do not value it."

"We examined the gender differences in the relative valuations of empowerment resources and decision-making areas across different farming systems, and examined the most valued empowerment resources."

"We conclude that gender and location play important roles in forming contextual conditions for empowerment and agency implying that empowerment efforts need to consider both."

"More specifically, policies and intervention efforts to empower individuals or groups must begin by first building their psychological assets and consider contextual gendered perceptions of resources."

Mr Kinati and the researchers also suggest that women's basic psychological needs are largely unfulfilled and they are marginalized from major decision-making, mainly due to their masked ineffectiveness.

Women's lack of confidence, stemming from , is often cited as one of the major obstacles to women's equitable participation in the major decision-making processes, they say.

"We recommend that building people's agency through cultivating the capacity to aspire and among women (men) would lead to enhance their access, ownership, and control of the other empowerment resources," Mr Kinati adds. "This could be done through implementing polices that attract more women extension agents—for instance, availing incentives, women pro-facilities and career opportunities—who are socially appropriate to reach out to more easily."

More information: Wole Kinati et al, Empowerment resources, decision-making and gender attitudes: which matter most to livestock keepers in the mixed and livestock-based systems in Ethiopia?, CABI Agriculture and Bioscience (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s43170-022-00114-6#Sec14

Provided by CABI

Citation: Value placed on resources and decisions in farming in Ethiopia differs across genders, study reveals (2022, August 8) retrieved 12 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Strengthening women's empowerment in fragile and conflict-affected settings


Feedback to editors