Did our ancestors have better microbiomes? For maize, maybe!

Did our ancestors have better microbiomes? For maize, maybe!
Modern domesticated maize and its wild ancestor, teosinte, growing in a greenhouse. Favela and colleagues compared how these plants shape their microbiomes. Credit: Alonso Favela

At today's backyard barbeques, we enjoy corn on the cob with hundreds of sweet juicy kernels. But if we were eating teosinte, the wild ancestor of corn, we would be lucky to enjoy a dozen kernels per ear. In fact, many of our modern crops bear little resemblance to their wild ancestors. Thanks to thousands of years of breeding, or "artificial selection," today's crops are tasty and produce high yields. However, they may have undergone additional changes that are harder to see (or taste).

While humans have improved crops to suit our tastes and , the can also alter traits that breeders did not intentionally target. In breeding crops for modern agriculture, we may have inadvertently made the plants more reliant on inputs such as fertilizers, which are energy-intensive to produce and often cause . Studies suggest that the microbial communities associated with maize have shifted over its history of domestication. These microbes can play important roles in ecosystem processes like cycling, converting nitrogen to forms that plants can readily access and use.

In "N-Cycling Microbiome Recruitment Differences Between Modern and Wild Zea maysa"—published by Phytobiomes Journal in June— Alonso Favela, Martin Bohn, and Angela Kent investigated these evolutionary changes in root-associated microbe recruitment. To do so, they grew both modern domesticated maize and wild teosinte in a greenhouse and introduced similar soil microbial communities. Once the plants had grown, the soil surrounding their roots was collected. The researchers then used DNA sequencing to study the makeup of each plant's microbiome, including genes related to nitrogen cycling.

The researchers found that domesticated plants recruited different microbes from the soil than their wild relatives, including microbes that are involved in nitrogen cycling. Whether the plant was wild or domesticated explained 62% of the variation in the associated microbial communities' nitrogen cycling gene diversity, and 66% of the nitrogen cycling gene abundance. In other words, thousands of years of seems to have driven substantial differences in the ways that these crops recruit assistance from microbes to access nitrogen. Looking into maize's evolutionary past may provide clues to how these could thrive without heavy reliance on synthetic fertilizers. "Understanding how wild teosinte shapes its N-cycling microbiome may allow us to bring these traits to modern maize production to improve nutrient sustainability" explains lead author Favela.

"This [research] highlights the potential to use from teosinte to 'rewild' our modern agricultural crops microbiome to make a more sustainable and effective agricultural system," Favela states. If we can breed crops that are better at recruiting helpful microbes like their ancestors, we could reduce our reliance on synthetic fertilizers and curtail the nutrient pollution that is destroying so many ecosystems.


Explore further

Going back in time restores decades of quiet corn drama

More information: Alonso Favela et al, N-Cycling Microbiome Recruitment Differences Between Modern and Wild Zea mays, Phytobiomes Journal (2021). DOI: 10.1094/PBIOMES-08-21-0049-R
Provided by American Phytopathological Society
Citation: Did our ancestors have better microbiomes? For maize, maybe! (2022, July 20) retrieved 1 October 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-07-ancestors-microbiomes-maize.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
10 shares

Feedback to editors