Scientists develop concept for feedback-controlled optical tweezers

Scientists develop concept for feedback-controlled optical tweezers
Working principles. a Setup sketch and principle of OFI-tracking. A spatial light modulator (SLM), illuminated by a near-infrared (NIR) laser beam generates several optical traps around the focal plane (FP, in red), which are imaged telecentrically with two lenses (DL and L) onto a CCD camera. b Objects within the FP—a cell cluster or beads—scatter the focused light resulting in a redistribution of intensities Idn(bn)Idn(bn) at the camera, which encode the object positions bn relative to the beam centers. The vectors tn indicate the trap positions relative to the center of the FP. Bottom: brightfield image of a 170 µm large cell cluster held by eight optical traps (marked by eight green crosses. c Blind and non-blind optical trapping. An extended stiff object is (blindly) trapped by three unstable optical traps. After adaptation of the focus positions tn according to the OFI-signals, trapping becomes stable (non-blind trapping). Object rotation by shifting the laser foci, makes trapping unstable again (blind or frustrated trapping). Credit: DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27262-z

We can test the quality and freshness of fruits and vegetables with our fingers, and even industrial robots have been performing successfully at tactile applications for years. But how is it possible to grab and rotate objects with the width of a human hair? Prof. Dr. Alexander Rohrbach from the University of Freiburg's Department of Microsystems Engineering and his team have now published a study on this question in the journal Nature Communications. Their work demonstrates how several optical tweezers made of highly focused laser light will one day be able to grab cell clusters in a controlled manner and rotate them in any desired direction. This will allow tiny objects like miniature tumors to be studied more specifically under the microscope.

Fingers made of laser light

In the laboratory, the grabbing fingers correspond to so-called , which are generated from highly focused laser light. The distinctive advantage of light is that, unlike mechanical tweezers, they can exert forces or torques even when grabbing through transparent objects.

Computer-holographic optical tweezers capable of focusing pixel by pixel in arbitrary and multiplied configurations have been used for years to control the positions of several grabbing fingers of light simultaneously in 3D space. This method has existed in research laboratories for almost two decades but is incapable of exerting forces and torques on larger objects, that is, ones with a diameter larger than approximately 1/10 mm. The tweezers encounter difficulties because the objects are too large and sluggish to be rotated in an arbitrary and stable manner in an , as the optical tweezers are either not strong enough or fail to find a good grabbing position and therefore slip off. Remarkably, the reason why they fail to find the best grabbing position is because they do not look for it at all but grab blindly, relying on the ability of the researchers attempting to position the optical tweezers.

The concept of non-blind optical tweezers

"Non-blind tweezers see what they are grabbing at by measuring and analyzing the light scattered on the ," Rohrbach explains. "We see various objects with our eyes because sunlight or indoor light is scattered on them and reproduced on our retina." Laser tweezers can grab through transparent objects. However, the biological research objects scientists study under the microscope, such as cell clusters like miniature tumors or small fly embryos, are not completely transparent but behave like frosted glass in a bathroom window, where the light is diffuse after transmission and thus difficult to analyze. The new concept for seeing where the tweezers are reaching is to analyze the defocused laser-scattered light on a fast camera behind the object, which serves as a feedback signal. The more asymmetrical the spots of light of the individual light tweezers on the camera are, the more the light at the focus is scattered, leading to a greater change in the refractive index at the respective point in the object. These are the points at which the optical tweezers can efficiently grab at the object. In terms of physics, a local change in the polarization of the matter leads to an increased optical dipole force.

According to Rohrbach, the astounding thing about the principle of localizing the best grabbing position is that the light scattering—that is, the change in momentum—is much stronger directly in the focus than that in front of or behind the focus. Each of the approximately five to ten optical tweezers should feel the best grabbing position on the basis of the scattered in order to rotate the object in different directions. If one of the tweezers exerts too much force, however, the other tweezers can lose their hold. "This is a highly complex optimization problem that we will be puzzling over for some years to come," says Rohrbach. His vision is that in the case of success the principle of contactless sample holding will be integrated into the microscopes of the future.

Explore further

Optical tweezer technology tweaked to overcome dangers of heat

More information: Benjamin Landenberger et al, Towards non-blind optical tweezing by finding 3D refractive index changes through off-focus interferometric tracking, Nature Communications (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27262-z
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Scientists develop concept for feedback-controlled optical tweezers (2021, December 23) retrieved 14 August 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors