CMS collaboration homes in on Higgs boson's lifetime

CMS homes in on Higgs boson’s lifetime
A Higgs boson candidate transforming into four muons (red lines). Credit: CERN

The Higgs boson doesn't stick around for long. Once it is created in particle collisions, the famed particle lives for a mere less than a trillionth of a billionth of a second or, more precisely, 1.6 x 10-22 seconds. According to theory, that is, for so far experiments have only been able to set bounds on the value of the particle's lifetime or to determine this property with a large uncertainty. Until now. In a new study, the CMS collaboration reports a value for the particle's lifetime that has a small enough uncertainty to confirm that the Higgs boson does have such a short lifetime.

Measuring the Higgs boson's lifetime is high on the wish list of particle physicists, because an experimental value of the lifetime would allow them not only to better understand the nature of the particle but also to find out whether or not the value matches the value predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics. A deviation from the prediction could point to new particles or forces not predicted by the Model, including new particles into which the Higgs boson would decay.

But it isn't easy to measure the Higgs boson's lifetime. For one, the predicted lifetime is too short to be measured directly. A possible solution entails measuring a related property called the mass width, which is inversely proportional to the lifetime and represents the small range of possible masses around the particle's nominal mass of 125 GeV. But this isn't easy either, as the predicted mass width of the Higgs boson is too small to be easily measured by experiments.

Quantum physics to the rescue. In addition to being produced with a mass equal or close to its nominal value, a short-lived particle such as the Higgs boson can also be produced with a much larger mass than the nominal value, although the odds of this happening are lower. This effect—and in fact the mass width of the particle as well—is a manifestation of a quantum quirk known as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and a comparison between the production rate of these large-mass, or "off-shell," Higgs bosons with that of the nominal or close to nominal, or "on-shell," Higgs bosons can be used to extract the Higgs boson's width and therefore its lifetime.

This is the method employed by the CMS team in their new study. By analyzing data collected by the CMS experiment during the second run of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), specifically data on Higgs bosons transforming into two Z bosons, which themselves transform into four charged leptons or two charged leptons plus two neutrinos, the CMS researchers have obtained the first-ever evidence for the production of off-shell Higgs bosons. From this result, which has only a 1 in 1000 chance of being a statistical fluke, the CMS team obtained a Higgs boson's lifetime of 2.1 x 10-22 seconds, with an upper/lower uncertainty of (+2.3/-0.9) x 10-22 seconds. This value, the most precise yet, aligns well with the Standard Model prediction and confirms that the particle does, indeed, have a tiny lifespan.

"Our result demonstrates that off-shell Higgs-boson production offers an excellent way to measure the Higgs boson's ," says CMS physicist Pascal Vanlaer. "And it sets a milestone in the study of the properties of this unique particle. The precision of the measurement is expected to improve in the coming years with data from the next LHC runs and new analysis ideas."

Provided by CERN

Citation: CMS collaboration homes in on Higgs boson's lifetime (2021, December 3) retrieved 5 February 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2021-12-cms-collaboration-homes-higgs-boson.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

ATLAS searches for pairs of Higgs bosons in a rare particle decay

433 shares

Feedback to editors