Alternative cement with low carbon footprint developed

Alternative cement with low carbon footprint developed
Graphical abstract. Credit: DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00299

Researchers at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (MLU) in Germany and the Brazilian University of Pará have developed a climate-friendly alternative to conventional cement. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions can be reduced during production by up to two thirds when a previously unused overburden from bauxite mining is used as a raw material. The alternative was found to be just as stable as the traditional Portland cement. The results were published in Sustainable Materials and Technologies.

Houses, factories, staircases, bridges, dams—none of these structures can be built without . According to estimates, almost 6 billion tons of cement were produced worldwide in 2020. Cement is not only an important building material, it is also responsible for around eight percent of manmade CO2 emissions. "Portland cement is traditionally made using various , including limestone, which are burned to form so-called clinker," explains Professor Herbert Pöllmann from MLU's Institute of Geosciences and Geography. "In the process, the calcium carbonate is converted into , releasing large quantities of ." Since CO2 is a , researchers have been looking for alternatives to Portland cement for several years.

One promising solution is calcium sulphoaluminate cement, in which a large portion of the limestone is replaced by bauxite. However, bauxite is a sought-after raw material in aluminum production and not available in unlimited quantities. Together with Brazilian mineralogists, the MLU team has now found an alternative to the alternative, so to speak: They do not use pure bauxite, but rather an overburden: Belterra clay. "This layer of clay can be up to 30 meters thick and covers the bauxite deposits in the tropical regions of the earth, for example in the Amazon basin," explains Pöllmann. "It contains enough minerals with an aluminum content to ensure good quality cement. It is also available in large quantities and can be processed without additional treatment." Another advantage: The Belterra clay has to be removed anyway, so it does not have to be extracted only for cement production.

Even though cement cannot be entirely produced without , at least 50 to 60 percent of the limestone can be replaced by Belterra clay. The process has another environmentally relevant advantage: the burning process only requires 1,250 degrees Celsius (2282° Fahrenheit) - 200 degrees (392° Fahrenheit) less than for Portland cement. "Our method not only releases less CO2 during the chemical conversion, but also when heating the rotary kilns", says Pöllmann. By coupling these effects, CO2 emissions can be reduced by up to two thirds during cement production.

In extensive laboratory tests, the mineralogists were able to prove that their alternative cement meets all the quality requirements placed on traditional Portland cement. Further research projects will now investigate whether there are also overburden sources in Germany suitable for cement production. "Raw materials containing clay minerals with a lower aluminum content could be used particularly in construction projects where lower-grade concrete is sufficient," explains Pöllmann. "There is still huge potential here to further reduce carbon dioxide emissions."

More information: Leonardo Boiadeiro Ayres Negrão et al, Production of low-CO2 cements using abundant bauxite overburden "Belterra Clay", Sustainable Materials and Technologies (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00299

Provided by Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

Citation: Alternative cement with low carbon footprint developed (2021, August 18) retrieved 18 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Cement as a climate killer: Using industrial waste to produce carbon neutral alternatives


Feedback to editors