The inner ear hides clues on human evolution

The inner ear hides clues on human evolution
Reconstruction of the life-appearance of Hispanopithecus laietanus housed at the Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont museum, at Sabadell. Credit: Pere Figuerola / ICP

A PNAS study led by the Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont (ICP) analyzed the kinship between two Miocene great apes (Hispanopithecus and Rudapithecus) based on the morphology of their inner ear semicircular canals. This anatomical structure is informative in reconstructing phylogenetic relationships between fossil primate species. The results are in accordance with the distinction of these taxa at a generic level and reinforce their allocation in the Hominidae. Furthermore, the similarities in semicircular canal morphology with extant chimpanzees and bonobos suggest that the latter possibly retained the ancestral condition, while orangutans appear to have derived the structure independently.

Living hominoids are a group of primates that includes the small-bodied apes (gibbons and siamangs) and the larger-body great apes (orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos), which, along with humans and their extant relatives, belong to the hominid family. Hominids, in turn, are divided in two subfamilies: the pongines (the orangutan lineage) and the hominines (the lineage of the great African apes and humans). Unraveling kinship relationships between living and that make up the tree of human evolution is one of the great challenges in paleoanthropology. Miocene great apes play a key role in this puzzle and are crucial for reconstructing the ancestral moprhology from which the first bipedal homininis evolved.

A new study directed by the Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont (ICP) sheds futher light on the relations of kinship between two fossil great apes, the driopithecines Hispanopithecus laietanus and Rudapithecus hungaricus. Both lived during the late Miocene, about 10 million years ago. Although they coexisted over time, their representatives probably did not inhabit the same areas: while Hispanopithecus lived in present-day Catalonia (remains have been found in the Vallès-Penedès basin and the Pre-Pyrenees), Rudapithecus inhabited present-day Hungary. Although there is a consensus among the scientific community that two taxa are closely related hominid , the debate about their phylogenetic relationships with the living members of the great ape/human clade are not settled. Some authors include the driopithecines in the orangutan lineage, while others consider them as ancestral hominines or as basal hominids preceding the divergence of both groups.

The inner ear hides clues on human evolution
Three-dimensional model of Rudapithecus inner ear (orange) embedded in the temporal bone (blue obtained from computed microtomography images. Credit: Alessandro Urciuoli / ICP

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) and led by Alessandro Urciuoli (ICP), addresses the relationship between these two species from an innovative perspective: by comparing their inner ear semicircular canal morphology. The evolutionary relationships between fossil and living species are complicated by the mosaic nature of hominid evolution and the presence of anatomical characteristics that evolved independently in response to selective pressures related with function. However, previous studies conducted by ICP researchers have shown that changes in the morphology of the bony labyrinth in the inner ear could be used a proxy for inferring the of hominoids. Furthermore, this structure (located in the cranium, inside temporal bone ) is fairly common in the fossil record due to its strong mineralization.

The differences in the morphology of these structures were inspected using a recently developed geometric morphometric approach performed on three-dimensional models of the obtained from high-resolution computed tomography of the fossil remains. This new technique consists of analyzing the deformation between continuous surfaces and thus quantifying the differences in shape between individuals and species. The results confirm that both Hispanopithecus and Rudapithecus are, indeed, hominids according to their robust canals (a unique character of great apes and humans). Furthermore, the differences found in the morphology of the two dryopithecine species support support their memberships in two different genera, which has been a matter of debate in the past.

The study goes one step further and, in a kind of time travel based on the analysis of living and fossil hominoid species, reconstructs how the semicircular canals of the last common ancestor of hominids would have looked. In this sense, the study concludes that the semicircular canals of extant chimpanzees and bonobos closely resemble those of the ancestor, while the markedly different morphology of orangutans would have evolved independently from the ancestral form.

Dryopithecines belong to a fossil group that inhabited Europe (and perhaps Asia) during the middle and late Miocene. Both Hispanopithecus and Rudapithecus were large sized (reaching 35 to 40 kg in males), fed mostly on fruits, and exhibited many features shared with today's great apes, including an orthograde body plan (suitable for locomotor behaviors performed with an erect trunk) and adaptations in the forelimbs and in the hand for below-branch suspension.


Explore further

Apes' inner ears could hide clues to evolutionary history of hominoids

More information: Alessandro Urciuoli et al. Reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of the late Miocene apes Hispanopithecus and Rudapithecus based on vestibular morphology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2021). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015215118
Provided by Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont
Citation: The inner ear hides clues on human evolution (2021, January 26) retrieved 27 February 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2021-01-ear-clues-human-evolution.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
426 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments