Neurologists say there is no medical justification for police use of neck restraints

Police
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Some police departments in the United States continue to teach officers that neck restraints are a safe method for controlling agitated or aggressive people, but that's a dangerous myth, according to a Viewpoint written by three neurologists at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in JAMA Neurology.

The killing of George Floyd, a Black man who died while being arrested in May 2020 after a police officer pressed a knee to his for more than eight minutes, helped spark a national conversation about racial injustice in the United States. Floyd's death made headlines, as did that of Eric Garner in 2014 after police placed him in a chokehold. Yet a number of other Americans have died during confrontations with who used neck restraints, says MGH neurologist Altaf Saadi, MD, senior author of the Viewpoint column.

Along with coauthors Jillian M. Berkman, MD, and Joseph A. Rosenthal, MD, Ph.D., Saadi was disturbed by the use of neck restraints by in the United States. They found that some prohibit chokeholds and other neck restraints, but others teach the techniques for the purpose of subduing allegedly uncooperative people during encounters. Notably, some agencies advise that carotid restraint—compressing the two large blood vessels on either side of the neck, which is known as a stranglehold—is a safe, nonlethal tactic that temporarily renders a person unconscious by reducing to the brain.

"As a neurologist, I know that there is never a scenario where stopping the flow of blood and oxygen to the brain is medically appropriate," says Saadi. "What shocked me most was that much of the literature supporting these techniques hides behind medical language, but lacks a real understanding of the pathophysiology of the significant harm they cause to an individual. As neurologists, we are taught that 'time is brain,' because there's such a rapid loss of human nervous tissue when the flow of blood and oxygen to the brain is reduced or stopped."

In their Viewpoint, Saadi and her colleagues describe how carotid compression—which can occur with as few as 6 kilograms (13 pounds) of force, or about the weight of a typical house cat—can result in stroke, seizure and death. They call for the creation of a system for reporting on law enforcement's use of neck restraints, including how often the technique is used and if it results in death or disability.

"It's in the public's best interest to have this data," says Saadi. She believes that increasing awareness about the impact of neck restraints could help curb their use. Ultimately, says Saadi, there is no medical justification for neck restraints in policing.


Explore further

Center for Justice Research Police Reform Action Brief: Ban chokeholds

More information: Carotid Physiology and Neck Restraints in Law Enforcement, JAMA Neurology (2020). DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4669
Journal information: Archives of Neurology

Citation: Neurologists say there is no medical justification for police use of neck restraints (2020, December 28) retrieved 19 April 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2020-12-neurologists-medical-justification-police-neck.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
21 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments