Report reveals continued global imbalance in distribution of peer review

Report reveals continued global imbalance in distribution of peer review
Key Highlights. Credit: Institute of Physics

A new global peer review study from IOP Publishing has found that the imbalance in the distribution of peer review continues to be felt by Western and more experienced reviewers.

German, U.S. and U.K. reviewers are more likely to feel overloaded by requests, with over 40 percent stating that they receive too many. In fact, nearly 50 percent of German reviewers indicated this to be the case. This is in contrast with reviewers from China and India, where less than 12 percent and 10 percent respectively reported receiving too many requests.

More than 1,200 reviewers from across the globe contributed to the report to provide rich and practical insights that will help improve the efficiency and quality of the peer review process.

Other findings reveal that the primary motivation for reviewers comes from an interest in the paper and that feedback is the most valuable form of recognition, with nearly 60 percent of respondents saying that cash or benefit-in-kind rewards provide very little motivation to review.

Commenting on the report, Antonia Seymour, Publishing Director at IOP Publishing said: "We provide the best possible experience and our commitment to ensuring high-quality, timely, rigorous and ethical peer review is at the heart of that. The number of papers needing review continues to increase while the number of reviewers has not followed at the same rate. This global trend has led to fatigue among experienced reviewers and those in certain locations who are being asked to review more frequently."

She continued, "We are constantly looking at how we can overcome these challenges, improve the peer review process and offer more support to peer reviewers. This led us to carry out this survey to truly understand the reviewer experience, what motivates them and their recognition needs. This understanding will be crucial to how our peer review process at IOP Publishing evolves. We are very grateful to all our respondents. They have provided us with a huge amount of useful information which will help us shape our approach and build new initiatives."


Explore further

BES launches large-scale study to test whether 'blinding' reduces bias in science publishing

More information: The report is available online: ioppublishing.org/peer-review-survey-insights/
Citation: Report reveals continued global imbalance in distribution of peer review (2020, August 27) retrieved 18 September 2020 from https://phys.org/news/2020-08-reveals-global-imbalance-peer.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments