Getting to the bottom of Antarctic ice shelf melt

Getting to the bottom of Antarctic ice shelf melt
Credit: Una Miller/Unsplash

New measurements from the ocean under the center of the Ross Ice Shelf have significantly improved our understanding of the complex processes that drive melting in Antarctica.

The measurements are the subject of a paper published this week in scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Lead author and NIWA marine physicist Dr. Craig Stevens says this is just the second set of measurements taken from this area, the first having been completed in 1977 with much more rudimentary technology and over a much shorter timeframe.

Melting Antarctic ice shelves will be responsible for a large proportion sea level rise caused by a warming climate. The ice shelves mainly melt from below by the ocean but with so little data available about how that water mixes, that significance is often overlooked in climate models. Dr. Stevens says the new measurements will help redress this.

The Ross Ice Shelf is the largest on the planet at 480,000 square kilometers. It is many hundred meters thick and more than 600km wide.

Dr. Stevens conducted the ocean measurements during an expedition in December 2017 when a hot water drill bored 350m meters through the ice to the ocean below. Instruments were then lowered through the hole and left for two years to record ocean currents and water temperature with data transmitted via satellite.

Securing the measurements underneath hundreds of meters of ice 350km from Scott Base presented a massive challenge for scientists, but Dr. Stevens says the information gathered emphasizes the importance of carrying out these kinds of expeditions. Importantly it was a highly collaborative science expedition. It was led by the University of Otago and the drill team came from Victoria University and demonstrated how scientists from CRIs and universities collaborate.

"Future climate projections largely depend on the longevity of the ice shelves so it is important to see what has changed. Bringing together observed and modeled perspectives is critical for improving our predictions of ice sheet evolution and how that will impact the planet."

He says the data collected, and comparisons with the 1977 data, provide valuable insight into the how the ocean circulates in the cavity under the ice shelf and the complexity of the processes involved.

Some key differences were observed between the measurements and those taken 40 years ago including salinity which reflects continent-wide changes. The team also observed short-term re-freezing on the underside of the ice shelf which Dr. Stevens says has implications for the melt rate and the dynamics of the upper ocean.

"This new insight emphasizes the importance of making these observations in the environment where they are taking place. These virtually unexplored areas are hidden from the sun and wind by hundreds of meters of ice and are subject to processes that we are not used to seeing in the open ."

The next phase will explore how to integrate these new measurements into the climate models.

"We have dramatically lifted the amount of data available and provided a basis for better understanding the complex processes that drive melting."

More information: Craig Stevens et al. Ocean mixing and heat transport processes observed under the Ross Ice Shelf control its basal melting, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2020). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910760117

Provided by National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)

Citation: Getting to the bottom of Antarctic ice shelf melt (2020, June 30) retrieved 23 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2020-06-bottom-antarctic-ice-shelf.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Antarctic ice shelves: research reveals a missing piece of the climate puzzle

143 shares

Feedback to editors