Do nature documentaries make a difference?

endangered species
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Nature documentaries raise species awareness and promote pro-conservation behaviours, but don't lead to donations to conservation charities, a new Irish study has revealed.

For the study, published in the journal Conservation Letters, researchers examined BBC's popular, six-episode documentary series, Planet Earth II (2016), narrated by David Attenborough.

The objective was to track how nature documentaries change attitudes towards nature by measuring audience reactions and engagement on social media.

"Criticism of nature documentaries often highlights that they are misleading, by showing pristine views of nature and portraying environmental problems. We wondered if it would be possible to answer this question using big data," said co-author, Dr. Darío Fernández-Bellon of the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences and the Environmental Research Institute in University College Cork (UCC).

Using Planet Earth II as a , the researchers found that, in line with criticism, the show allocated very little time to conservation topics, and those that were mentioned generated little reaction in audiences.

"But we did find that the show generated active interest in the it portrayed, and that in some cases this interest lasted up to six months after the initial broadcast," Dr. Fernández-Bellon added.

The research examined how Planet Earth II portrayed nature, from what species appeared in the show and how much screen time was dedicated to each, to what group of animals they belonged to. They subsequently searched Twitter for 35,000 tweets with the hashtag #PlanetEarth2, to see if audiences reacted more to some species than others.

By analysing the number of visits to Wikipedia pages of each species, they assessed whether audiences searched for further information on the species featured in the show. Finally, they examined if donations to two nature charities coincided with the broadcast of the show.

Do nature documentaries make a difference?
Sand grouse quickly take to the wing to get out of the way of these fighting oryx. Credit: BBC

Public awareness of species previously unheard of lasted for months

"We expected there would be a bigger reaction to mammals than other species. But audience reactions on Twitter depended on how long each species was on screen," said Dr. Fernández-Bellon.

"The same was true for Wikipedia. You would see peaks in visits to a species page immediately after the broadcast—the species that got more airtime also got bigger peaks," commented fellow co-author Dr. Adam Kane from University College Dublin.

"We didn't expect that people would be more interested in locusts than in lions or giraffes. But the swarm of locusts in Planet Earth II got a bigger reaction than many species usually considered 'charismatic' by conservationists."

This effect was independent of how well or poorly known the species was beforehand. The researchers found that Wikipedia pages of species that were less well known, such as the Golden Mole, received little or no attention before the show, but Planet Earth II served to put them on the map, generating increases in public awareness which lasted for months.

"The extreme example is the racer snakes from the famous scene where they chase the iguanas. Racer snakes had no Wikipedia page before the show. Two days later, they did!" said Dr. Fernández-Bellon.

Donations did not follow

Although the research found changes in public awareness of species, the link with proactive conservation actions, such as donations, is not clear.

Do nature documentaries make a difference?
A jaguar resting in the shade of the riverbank - but always alert for prey that might come past. Credit: BBC

"We tried to see if this spike in interest in the led to increased donations to nature charities," Dr. Kane said.

"But we found no clear evidence for this. In a way, this is not altogether surprising, because there was no unique charity that was associated with the show—in the way that the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) was associated with the more recent Netflix series Our Planet.

"Also, donations are the result of many factors: education, attitudes, personality, and such a combination of factors makes it tricky to track donations to a single cause."

More time should be given to endangered species

Speaking about the implications of the study, the researchers called for increased attention to how conservation messages—whether in nature documentaries or conservation campaigns—are delivered.

According to UCC's Dr. Fernández-Bellon, who also works as a researcher on nature documentaries: "Our study shows points to specific things filmmakers can do to increase awareness. By giving more airtime to one species over another, you can get more people interested in it."

Awareness is the first step towards changing people's attitudes, so more time should be given to endangered species, he believes.

"Filmmakers need to pick their battles and know that how they choose to portray nature can make a difference to the world by changing audience attitudes. Analysing can help filmmakers and conservationists figure out how best to get their messages across."


Explore further

Nature documentaries increasingly talk about threats to nature, but still don't show them

More information: Darío Fernández‐Bellon et al. Natural history films raise species awareness—A big data approach, Conservation Letters (2019). DOI: 10.1111/conl.12678
Journal information: Conservation Letters

Citation: Do nature documentaries make a difference? (2019, October 4) retrieved 15 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-10-nature-documentaries-difference.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
255 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 05, 2019
wrong answer. people have to make a living. help's got nothing to do with it.

Oct 07, 2019
Not directly related to this article, but felt I needed to express a concern. I just saw a program on PBS called Wild Metropolis. It was about how wildlife was adapting to urban environments. One of the segments was about a salamander that normally sticks its eggs to underwater plants, This one found a "great" alternative in a scrap of plastic bag in the water.

Watching this I was outraged. The entire program seemed to dismiss the impact of human activity on nature. I tried to find out who was behind the production of this show, but found nothing yet. I suspect it is someone with an agenda much like the Kochs.

Oct 07, 2019
If you mess with that cat in the picture get ready to be scratched. See those ears? They put them down when they're aggressive.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more