To get a high-renewable electric grid, build more solar and wind than needed

A radical idea to get a high-renewable electric grid: Build way more solar and wind than needed
Expanding solar power potential more than it’s needed could replace more expensive energy storage. Credit: Jamey Stillings, CC BY-SA

The famous inventor Edwin Land said, "It's not that we need new ideas, but we need to stop having old ideas." He seemed to be telling us that solutions lie just beyond our old habits of thinking.

Cities, states and countries around the world are committing to clean energy economies that run on very high levels—even 100%—of . In New York state alone, four competing bills target 50% to 100% renewables by or before 2040.

Realistically, only two renewable energy resources are large enough to meet these very high-penetration objectives on the supply side in the U.S.—solar (by far) and wind.

Both, however, are variable resources, driven by weather as well as daily and seasonal cycles. Therefore, they must be "firmed—that is, capable of delivery power on demand—in order to replace fossil resources which can be dispatched as needed. Based on our research, we contend that this firm power transformation is not only possible, it is also affordable—if we stop having old ideas.

One entrenched, and very prevalent, idea—likely a result of historically high renewable energy prices—is that all the power generated by renewable resources must be sold as it is generated. The idea of discarding available wind or is anathema, imposed on power producers when production from these sources exceeds what the grid can accept.

This old idea ignores a fundamental proposition: oversizing and proactively curtailing wind and solar. However counterintuitive, a study our colleagues and we conducted shows that these steps are the key to the least expensive path to an powered largely by solar and wind.

Weighing against energy storage

The reasoning behind overprovisioning solar and wind is straightforward:

  • Energy storage is the one essential ingredient needed to fill renewable energy variability when the sun does not shine or the wind does not blow. These gaps include intra-day periods, such as hours of peak demand during the day and nights, and more importantly, larger multi-day and seasonal gaps from sustained low-sun or low-wind conditions. For storage, grid operators—the organizations that ensure power supply matches demand as it rises and falls during the day—typically rely on water reservoirs called pumped hydro or, for shorter periods, batteries.
  • Storage is getting cheaper, but even assuming the most optimistic long-term cost projections, our study led us to conclude that applying storage alone to firm wind or solar will remain prohibitively expensive because of the size of multi-day and seasonal gaps. Wind and solar are becoming much less expensive as well, especially solar, to the point where overbuilding is increasingly affordable. This is true even when the output from wind and solar generators is essentially dumped, or "curtailed," and not fed into the grid.
  • Oversizing reduces production gaps because more energy output is available during periods of low solar and wind availability. Overbuilding also reduces storage requirements.

"Firming' with overcapacity

Today, the current regulatory practice for solar and wind-generated electricity favors maximizing production at all times. The companies that operate these facilities seek to sell all their output at the highest prices, so curtailing output is seen as a revenue loss.

That old operational idea inhibits the transition to relying on solar and wind as firm, on-demand sources, since all their output is used only when it is available. This approach also keeps renewable energy at the margin.

A radical idea to get a high-renewable electric grid: Build way more solar and wind than needed
This chart shows how providing round-the-clock energy from wind and solar with storage only remains far more expensive than ‘grid parity,’ the cost of natural gas-supplied power (B). But storage combined with excess wind and solar that is curtailed about 30% of the time can be less expensive than grid parity and deliver power on demand. Credit: Richard Perez, Karl R. Rabago, CC BY-ND

How would a grid with overbuilt solar and wind resources work in practice? Let's say the operator of a regional electricity grid needs X megawatt-hours/day to meet demand. Today the in that region can meet or exceed this demand only on days of the highest production, such as clear days in the summer. On other days, the production gaps are met by storage.

By contrast, when the solar resource is oversized, that solar generator can meet the X MWh/day demand more days of the year and there are fewer gaps—hence there are fewer times that is need to fill the gaps.

Once firmed up through a combination of overprovisioning and storage, variable become effectively dispatchable—able to provide power when as needed—and functionally equivalent to traditional power plants. In this way, renewables can replace these generators without major grid reengineering.

Our team has modeled a high-solar and overbuilt solution for the not particularly sunny state of Minnesota. The goal was to determine the least costly combination of grid-connected solar, wind and storage necessary to provide round-the-clock, year-round energy services.

The study demonstrates that overcoming the natural variability of solar and wind can be accomplished at costs below current grid costs (so-called "grid parity") by overbuilding solar and wind resources and adopting a grid operating strategy of allowing about 20% to 40% curtailment of excess energy generation. Energy storage is also used in our model, but the superior economics directly result from substituting excess curtailable generation for more expensive storage.

A legitimate question to ask is what would be the area required for a full deployment of oversized solar PV. For Minnesota, in the most extreme 100% PV generation scenario assuming oversizing by a factor of two—or doubling the solar needed to meet current demand—this area would amount to 435 square miles, assuming solar panels with state-of-the-art efficiency of 20%. This area represents less than 1% of the state's cultivated crops and half of the high- and medium-density urbanized space.

Tweaking how the bulk power grid is run

In addition to oversizing, curtailment and storage optimization, several operational and planning practices, some of which are already done now, would further enhance the value and performance of a high-solar grid and foster its realization with minimal disruptions. They include:

Exploiting the complementary performance and variable operating profiles of solar and wind. In most locations wind and solar have complementary diurnal and seasonal production profiles— higher at night and in winter, PV higher in the daytime in summer.

Utilizing demand management—the practice of reducing power use at electricity customer locations—as a way to minimize supply and demand gaps.

Enabling grid operators to have authority over renewable energy siting and production management within their regions so that decisions over when curtailment occurs or storage is applied are made on a regional basis to minimize gaps in supply and demand.

An attitude of maximizing renewable production and avoiding curtailment made sense when variable solar generation was extremely expensive and firming solutions were even more expensive. However, recent and forecast reductions in turnkey solar, management and costs are changing the optimal solution set, starting with overbuilding solar.

Explore further

Solar energy expert shares blueprint for a carbon-free future in PV-tech power

Provided by The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation: To get a high-renewable electric grid, build more solar and wind than needed (2019, May 31) retrieved 18 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 31, 2019
"In REAL life, 100% renewables = 80% natural gas & 20% renewables. No wonder natural gas is the fastest growing fuel worldwide."

RE "snake oil salesmen" explicitly advocating for NatGas(methane: worse than CO2),
because solar & wind(that not even they use/buy) are just 'decorative facades' to keep the expansion of the gas(fracking) industry over carbon-free nuclear energy.

May 31, 2019
"To get a high-renewable electric grid, build more solar and wind than needed"
"There really is no correlation between high percentage of installed capacity of renewables and low carbon intensity"

"Unreliable: Adding Capacity Does Little To Solve Germany's Green-Energy Power Gaps" - Mar 2019
"More installed capacity, yet less output!"

"...140 Gigawatts of Solar and Wind Capacity Installed Globally in 2018..."
at cost of hundreds of billions of dollars and huge ecological impacts with almost nothing to show at reducing emissions.
"Global carbon emissions hit record high in 2018, International Energy Agency says"

May 31, 2019
Use 'market forces' to balance the grid. Charge and Pay more for supply/generation/use at peak times. If this doesn't work you are not paying enough!
All connected EV cars are storage: make it worth their while to invest and connect.
Factories would also buy their own storage: to avoid buying at peak prices; and to sell their surplus at a profit.
(The main problem will be gas burner generators trying to get PV generation prices.)

Jun 01, 2019
It would cost over $110 billion to convert Minnesota to renewables. Even then, you would not have enough (over 435 square miles) to compensate for weather conditions.

Jul 06, 2019
Get 100% renewable!

Wind, solar, storage and back-up system designer for 100% renewable energy grids and microgrids with 24/7/52 power-on-demand!

Replies, comments and questions about using the Wind, solar, storage and back-up system designer at this blog link please.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more