Programming the forces of evolution

Programming the forces of evolution
Credit: iCube Programme

The genius of evolution is rarely seen in action, so the invisible hand guiding the direction of biological systems is often taken for granted. However, by applying the principles of natural selection to research questions and designing robots to carry out these tasks, scientists are creating the world's first evolutionary machines.

It sounds like something from , but there are immediate practical benefits to this forward-looking approach. Designing everything from pharmaceuticals to cellphones requires countless hours of trial and error in a lab, experimenting with combinations of new materials, then laboriously testing and optimising them. Fortunately, help may be on the way in the form of a computational robotic system that applies the principles of evolution to the process of materials discovery.

"It's evolution first," says Dr. Lee Cronin, a chemist at the University of Glasgow, UK. "Evolution created biology, not the other way around." It led to the astonishing complexity of the biological world and Cronin believes that it is the perfect solution for too.

"We needed a process to generate physical entities, put them into an environment and see if they live or die," he explains. For this, Cronin and colleagues in the EU project EVOBLISS designed a modular robot that would mix oil droplets on a petri dish and move them around. The behavior of the droplet was recorded, along with the starting conditions that created it.

In this way, they could screen and select droplets with certain material characteristics: if they behaved in the desired way they 'lived' and the conditions to create it survived. If they didn't they 'died' and were discarded.

This type of evolutionary search greatly cuts down on time and costs because the robot performs thousands of trials without interruption. For Cronin though, the real advantage of the approach goes beyond screening. "Evolution does so much more, it generates novelty to solve problems you never thought possible," he says. With the robot they can explore unexpectedness, meaning when a droplet behaves in a novel way, the conditions can be saved and further optimised.

The concept of using evolution-powered computers is proving incredibly effective for dealing with . Alfonso Jaramillo, Professor of Synthetic Biology at the University of Warwick, UK, developed a similar approach to solve complex biological problems like combatting antimicrobial resistance. In his evolutionary computer, real bacteria are altered to avoid being infected by bacteriophages. When a phage 'solves' the problem of beating the bacteria's defenses it survives. There are incalculable amounts of molecular interactions occurring during this process, but, according to Jaramillo, "when evolution takes place you already know the outcome of the reaction." The computation is done within the virus itself and the data stored in its genome.

Back in the materials lab the situation is the same. The computations are not being performed on a computer; they are done physically in the robot. Cronin says data stored on a silicon chip is only a representation of reality. "We are using our system to optimise reality."

Blair Brettman, assistant professor at Georgia Tech School of Material Science and Engineering, US, previously worked in industry doing many of the experiments EVOBLISS now promises to automate. She is optimistic about the technology's ability to reduce human labour and explore how complex materials will behave. "Most commercial materials are mixtures of lots of different things and it's very difficult to predict how the combinations will react."

However, Brettman does see some challenges. "Most limiting is what you have to characterise or learn about the sample," she says. "If all you want to do is look at how well a liquid wets that will be relatively easy. But if you want to look at how a liquid penetrates a solid that's going to be much harder to analyse." The more complex the material is to manipulate and the variables to measure, the more difficult scale-up will be.

This is one reason why the researchers started with liquid materials but conceptually it can be extrapolated to any material. So far, platforms to specifically optimise three classes of have been designed: cleaning liquids, gold nano-clusters that detect chemical contaminants, and new drug-like organic molecules.

With this new appreciation of as the starting point, and not the consequence of biology, evolutionary machines seem set to harness this unique force of nature. EVOBLISS is supported by the EU Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) programme.


Explore further

Chemists create 'artificial chemical evolution' for the first time

Provided by iCube Programme
Citation: Programming the forces of evolution (2019, May 23) retrieved 24 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-05-evolution.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
193 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 23, 2019
while i highly appreciate the usage of AI and evolutionary type algorithms in computer science and technology, evolution as a whole is completely absurd. The scientific community as a whole refuses to acknowledge the fact that evolution violates the fundamental law of entropy, a law that governs the entire universe. Species can adapt, but that is entirely different from evolution as it relates to bio-genesis and birds turning into fish or whatever. Anyone who thinks evolution is the end all be all of our existence needs to take a honest look at the fine tuned universe theory, drake equasion, entropy laws and the holographic universe theory. If you still think evolution is real after studying the above items, you were not paying attention.

May 29, 2019
The article starts out with this sentence: "The genius of evolution is rarely seen in action, so the invisible hand guiding the direction of biological systems is often taken for granted. However, by applying the principles of natural selection to research questions and designing robots to carry out these tasks, scientists are creating the world's first evolutionary machines."

First of all, calling evolution "genius" is an oxymoron. It is a blind, directionless, and purposeless process. There is no invisible hand guiding it. If there is, it would not be evolution, but rather intelligent design.

Without a mind behind it all, evolution would never be able to produce what we see in the biological world of life. Evolution does NOT create machines. Scientists can and do, but random blind directionless purposeless evolutionary processes? No. Sorry.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more