New theory illustrates the development of the universe may be different than we thought

universe
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The history of the universe is predicated on the idea that, compared to today, the universe was hotter and more symmetric in its early phase. Scientists have thought this because of the Higgs Boson finding—the particle that gives mass to all other fundamental particles. The concept is that as one analyzes time back toward the Big Bang, the universe gets hotter and the Higgs phase changes to one where everything became massless. Now, physicists are presenting a new theory that suggests an alternative history of the universe is possible.

The research, funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy, is led by Patrick Meade, Ph.D., Associate Professor in the C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics at Stony Brook University and his former Ph.D. student, Harikrishnan Ramani. The findings are published in the latest edition of Physical Review Letters.

The researchers propose a theory beyond the Standard Model of particle physics that describes how electroweak symmetry is not restored at high temperatures. If correct, this would lead to many potential consequences during the development of the universe, such as other phases of matter, particles staying massive in primordial plasma, and new possibilities for explaining the matter-antimatter asymmetry. The theory also highlights how the history of the universe could be very counterintuitive compared to many phenomenon on earth that demonstrate symmetry restoration.


Explore further

New finding of particle physics may help to explain the absence of antimatter

More information: Patrick Meade et al. Unrestored Electroweak Symmetry, Physical Review Letters (2019). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041802
Journal information: Physical Review Letters

Citation: New theory illustrates the development of the universe may be different than we thought (2019, February 11) retrieved 22 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-02-theory-universe-thought.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
698 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 11, 2019
The energy described in the following article at the scale of our Universe's super-supermassive black hole is dark energy.

'Black holes banish matter into cosmic voids'
http://www.spaced...999.html

> "Some of the matter falling towards the [supermassive black] holes is converted into energy. This energy is delivered to the surrounding gas, and leads to large outflows of matter, which stretch for hundreds of thousands of light years from the black holes, reaching far beyond the extent of their host galaxies."

Our visible universe is in the outflow of a super-supermassive black hole. As ordinary matter falls toward the super-supermassive black hole it evaporates into dark matter. It is the dark matter outflow which pushes the galaxy clusters, causing them to move outward and away from us. The dark matter outflow is dark energy.

Feb 11, 2019
I offer an explanation for dark matter and dark energy that also explains the behavior of Oumuamua. I paste an abstract here along with a link to my article on this.
ABSTRACT
Galactic rotation rates, the distribution of matter in the early universe shown by the scale of anisotropies in the CMB, and cosmological expansion present problems that current theory attempts to resolve by positing dark matter and dark energy. This paper posits that gravitational force is a dampened wave function dependent upon mass and distance. Therefore gravity reverses at regular dampened intervals. This reversal would also be in effect at smaller scales such as our own solar system, implying that current theory may have overlooked evidence of this in the data from various probes that have been launched.
LINK: https://redd.it/ao8vfo

Feb 11, 2019
This is like a "theory" that when you drop things out of windows they don't actually fall.

This one I don't buy. Nice that someone's looking into it but I hope they're not too credulous.

Feb 11, 2019
By no means do I have the education to back up this thought, but could it be that black holes are made up of only anti-matter and any matter that falls in to them is converted to dark energy and expelled? Could the number of black holes account for the lack of Anti-Mater in the universe and the energy produced when matter comes in to contact with it is forcing the expansion of the universe?

Feel free to simply answer "nope" and we can all move on :)

Feb 11, 2019
If we believe that our World has started sometimes ago we are still in the position to decide which hypothesis, Lemaître's or Gamow's was closer to reality. There is an opinion that the problems in the standard cosmology could be solved by adjusting of details. Our suggestion is that we have to go back to the conceptions and use the observations accumulated since.
https://www.acade...osmology

Feb 12, 2019
Disregarding the crackpots, two comments merit response:

Nice that someone's looking into it


Agreed, but these types of non-standard theories are ubiquitous meritorious (or not) work. They stand and fall on observation which we don't yet have, so are often put in the arxiv (literary) for a rainy day.

could it be that black holes are made up of only anti-matter


From lack of annihilation spectral lines, there is not enough anti-matter [ https://www.forbe...ows-why/ ].

But the type of matter doesn't ... *ahem* ... matter for the black hole. The "no-hair theorem" says all of its properties is mass, spin and charge [ https://en.wikipe..._theorem ].

Feb 12, 2019
The only development of the universe we can see is that of the observable part, being maybe 5% of the total energy. Converting 5% to matter/antimatter would seem to be easily explainable as some local turbulence in the total energy of spacetime. Where there is energy there is turbulence - heating, cooling, condensation, expansion, etc. You'd think it wold happen all the time - the latest 13.7 billion years we find ourselves in only a typical recurring event. Which would answer questions about how some of those humongous black holes came about - leftovers from previous similar events.

Feb 14, 2019
So the lights go out and the storm just sort of dissipates. Except, I understand, for the black holes, where their rate of dissipation is not matched with their merger rate. Resulting in fewer and fewer but larger and larger black holes, until they are merged into regions of spacetime originally separated during inflation by the forces of annihilation and selection. That is annihilation and expansion drive inflation until matter and antimatter settle into mostly separate domains. At least separated by observation. But eventually the separate domains will be rejoined as their black holes merge, with the merger point appearing as the single point from which a new U originates. And the second law of thermodynamics appears to again take affect.

Feb 14, 2019
"the observable part, being maybe 5% of the total energy".

1) We observe all the energy density - which is likely what you mean - in modern cosmology, or we couldn't model the universe.

2) The universe is perfectly flat so zero total energy so likely infinite in space and time (eternal inflation). So your (unintended) "total" is either zero (total energy) or infinite (total volume with energy).

Feb 14, 2019
"the observable part, being maybe 5% of the total energy".

1) We observe all the energy density - which is likely what you mean - in modern cosmology, or we couldn't model the universe.

2) The universe is perfectly flat so zero total energy so likely infinite in space and time (eternal inflation). So your (unintended) "total" is either zero (total energy) or infinite (total volume with energy).
I was thinking of the WMAP pie charts. I'm thinking the inflationary process from annihilation I describe would force a constant energy distribution as long as equal amounts of matter and antimatter are formed.

Feb 14, 2019
cont
That is when particle pairs are formed they separate in opposite but random directions so there is no preferred direction. Inflation has to continue until matter and antimatter settle into opposite domains and by this time I should think the energy densities should be mixed up enough to form a mostly uniform energy distribution.

Feb 14, 2019
cont
Separate domains may be a better term than opposite domains. They may be like separate bubble universes which don't interact until they decay and form merging black holes. When there is not enough outlying matter outside of the black holes, there is nothing left to interact with matter of the opposite type and continue annihilation and inflation. That is until the black holes themselves begin annihilation on a grander scale.

Feb 16, 2019
cont
You might take the rather morbid point of view that matter/antimatter is only the fuel to establish and maintain the separation and flatness of the bubble universes. When it is all used up, the bubble universes have at it again.

"He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword:"

Feb 16, 2019
Note there is a reference to a parallel universe at https://en.m.wiki...ld_spot. Also some mention of a hot ring around the cold spot, which would be consistent with the collision surface around the area of colliding black holes.

Feb 17, 2019
cont
An obvious reason why the universe is flat is that the higher energy density regions formed galaxies, as I understand the WMAP data. Same reasoning would apply to any parallel universe.

Feb 18, 2019
Note there is a reference to a parallel universe at https://en.m.wiki...old_spot.]https://en.m.wiki...ld_spot.[/url] Also some mention of a hot ring around the cold spot, which would be consistent with the collision surface around the area of colliding black holes.


It should be mentioned that at https://en.m.wiki...old_spot "The cold spot is mainly anomalous because it stands out compared to the relatively hot ring around it"

Feb 18, 2019
could it be that black holes are made up of only anti-matter
Neither matter or anti-matter, actually IMOP. They are holes in spacetime which causes gravity to reduce matter/antimatter to their constituent bosons and eject them back into a region around the galaxy which increases its energy density and acts like the dark matter holding galaxies together. The jets come from charged particles orbiting the black holes outside the event horizon and generating powerful magnetic fields.

Feb 18, 2019
From lack of annihilation spectral lines, there is not enough anti-matter [ https://www.forbe...ows-why/

But the type of matter doesn't ... *ahem* ... matter for the black hole.
Yes, since I posited above matter/antimatter is broken down to its constituent bosons inside the event horizon and ejected through wormholes.
The "no-hair theorem" says all of its properties is mass, spin and charge [ https://en.wikipe..._theorem ].
Mass in this since being the amount of matter broken down into its constituent bosons.

Feb 19, 2019
Considering inflation - faster than the speed of light - if different points on two large objects collided simultaneously it might appear that inflation started simultaneously at both points - you might say it was spreading faster than the speed of light but that would only be an artifact of the geometry of the colliding objects. Actually from the shape of the inflation expansion profile in time you could calculate the shape of the colliding objects. If you knew the relative speed of the colliding objects you could estimate the actual size of the collision region. Other features of the WMAP data might enable one to calculate something about the relative spin of the objects. Or so it seems from the physics barnyard.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more