Stonehenge mystery solved? Prehistoric French may have inspired it and other European megaliths

February 12, 2019 by Doyle Rice, Usa Today
The Dolmen di Sa Coveccada megalithic grave, Sardinia. Credit: Bettina Schulz Paulsson.

Although Stonehenge may be the most famous of Europe's megaliths, it's far from the only one: There are about 35,000 of these mysterious stone structures throughout the continent.

Now a new study suggests that an that emerged from what's now the Brittany region of northwest France may have begun building these structures and monuments some 7,000 years ago.

Study author Bettina Schulz Paulsson of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden said that the megalith building probably began in France and spread from there via sea routes around Europe over the next 1,000 years or so.

Over an exhausting 10 years, Schulz Paulson created a "megalith evolution" using of more than 2,000 historic sites across Europe. "We have thus been able to demonstrate that the earliest megaliths originated in northwest France and spread along the of the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts in three successive principal phases," she wrote in the study.

Thus, though this group of ancient French people may not have built Stonehenge, they may have inspired—and given the idea for it—to the people who did build it.

If this is true, then the maritime skills and technology of societies like this one may have been far more advanced than previously thought, the study said.

AMegalithic grave on the north coast of Brittany. Credit: Bettina Schulz Paulsson

Famed Stonehenge is among the most recent megaliths constructed, likely around 2,500 B.C.

Other theories have said they may have originated in the Near East or even possibly independently, but this new research appears to rule those ideas out.

"This demonstrates absolutely that Brittany is the origin of the European megalithic phenomenon," Michael Parker Pearson, an archaeologist and Stonehenge specialist at University College London, told Science magazine.

The results were published Monday in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Explore further: Stonehenge isn't the only prehistoric monument that's been moved – but it's still unique

More information: B. Schulz Paulsson. Radiocarbon dates and Bayesian modeling support maritime diffusion model for megaliths in Europe, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1813268116

Related Stories

Stonehenge skeleton came from Mediterranean

September 29, 2010

(AP) -- A wealthy young teenager buried near Britain's mysterious Stonehenge monument came from the Mediterranean hundreds of miles away, scientists said Wednesday, proof of the site's importance as a travel destination in ...

Recommended for you

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (6) Feb 12, 2019
Interesting geographical coincidence(!) with the Solutrean Hypothesis.
5 / 5 (5) Feb 12, 2019
Interesting geographical coincidence(!) with the Solutrean Hypothesis.

This remark does not seem to make any sense at all. Anything and everything that happened in Europe has a "geographical coincidence" with said hypothesis. The thing is - this happened 10 000 - 14 000 years later than said hypothetical migration.
5 / 5 (2) Feb 12, 2019
The biggest problem with the Solutrean Hypothesis is that there is no supporting DNA evidence. Or even the correct artifacts. Salting a site because the Solutrean SHOULD have been there? Was a real career-busting fiasco.

Now? Even if confirmed evidence was recovered & proven? I doubt if there would be a general acceptance.
Who would believe you?

The other problem with the Hypothesis is that currents in the North Atlantic run the wrong direction for smallboat maritime transit.

That the North Pacific currents are cooperative for smallboat maritime migration from Siberia Asia to the Americas. Plus all the positive DNA & matching artifacts for evidence.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.