The medium shapes the message: New communication technologies may bias historical record

February 20, 2019, Public Library of Science
The composition of occupations for the biographies in Pantheon 2.0:For the period between (A) 1-1450, (B) 1450-1880, (C) 1880-1950, and (D) 1950-2000. Credit: Jara-Figueroa et al (2019)

The introduction of communication technologies appears to bias historical records in the direction of the content best suited for each technology, according to a study published February 20, 2019 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by C. Jara-Figueroa and colleagues from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Studying the societal impact of new technologies is challenging, due to limited data on as well as the difficulty of parsing observed correlations. The authors of this study used a dataset of almost 14,000 biographies, classified by primary occupation on Wikipedia or Wikidata. They analyzed the impact of the printing press, radio, and television, on the biographical content that was recorded following their introduction.

They found that the introduction of printing (1450-1880) was associated with an increase in the number of painters, composers, and scientists recorded in Wikipedia's biographical records, as well as a decrease in religious figures. Cities thought to be early adopters of printing were more likely to be the birthplace of recorded scientists and artists than cities which adopted later. The introduction of radio (1880-1950) was associated with a significant shift towards the performing arts in Wikipedia's biographical records. Finally, with the introduction of television (1950-2000), the authors found an increase in recorded sports players and a further increase in the number of performing artists. The authors believe their results may indicate that historical figures whose work was best suited to available media—for example, musicians for radio, and sportspeople for television, were most likely to be recorded in historical records.

The authors emphasize that their data relies largely on Wikipedia, a community-edited resource, and also note that the memorability and fame of recent individuals is prone to change over time. However, they note this indication that prevalent communication technologies rapidly affect the biographies present in our modern digital historical records warrants further investigation—and may contain clues to the "heroes" we will produce for future .

The authors add: "McLuhan was right! A team of MIT researchers used to study the effect of communication technologies on collective memory. They found that new communication technologies change the occupations of people who achieved global fame."

Explore further: Scientists look to past to help identify fish threatened with local extinction

More information: Jara-Figueroa C, Yu AZ, Hidalgo CA (2019) How the medium shapes the message: Printing and the rise of the arts and sciences. PLoS ONE 14(2): e0205771. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205771

Related Stories

Historical records miss a fifth of global warming: NASA

July 22, 2016

A new NASA-led study finds that almost one-fifth of the global warming that has occurred in the past 150 years has been missed by historical records due to quirks in how global temperatures were recorded. The study explains ...

New clues to Wikipedia's shared super mind

March 28, 2013

(Phys.org) —Wikipedia's remarkable accuracy and usefulness comes from something larger than the sum of its written contributions, a new study by SFI Research Fellow Simon DeDeo finds.

Recommended for you

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Thorium Boy
3 / 5 (2) Feb 20, 2019
How about the penchant for revisionist history the progessives display?
rrwillsj
not rated yet Feb 25, 2019
well ponyboy, with your penchant to falsify data? your proclivity for ignorance, your bias for propaganda?

Someone has to revise the mess you made back to an accurate rendition of facts.

You are like a cat shitting on the kitchen linoleum floor.
As you start to walk away?
Your hind-legs instictively scratch behind you, to hide your pile of crap.
Then you sashay out the room with your nose in the air.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.