New model predicts how ground shipping will affect future human health, environment

February 11, 2019 by Lois Yoksoulian, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Civil and environmental engineering professor Tami Bond is part of a team modeling the impact of the freight industry on human health and the eniviroment. Credit: L. Brian Stauffer

The trucks and trains that transport goods across the United States emit gases and particles that threaten human health and the environment. A University of Illinois-led project developed a new model that predicts through 2050 the impact of different environmental policies on human mortality rates and short- and long-term climate change caused by particulate and greenhouse gas emissions.

The findings are reported in the journal Nature Sustainability.

Greenhouse gas and some particulate matter emissions cause the atmosphere to heat up, but at different rates, said Tami Bond, a civil and environmental engineering professor who led the study with graduate student Liang Liu. "Particulate matter washes out of the atmosphere quickly, making its effect on climate short-lived—unlike greenhouse gases that stay in the atmosphere for decades. Particulate matter has the added drawback of causing inhalation-related diseases," she said.

Civil and environmental engineering professor Yanfeng Ouyang and urban and regional planning professor Bumsoo Lee collaborated to make the modeled projections possible, along with researchers from the University of Washington, Pennsylvania State University, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory.

The researchers used what they call a "system of systems" approach to model how the increased volume of shipping, mode of transport, population density and environmental policies will factor into the future health and climate impacts of land freight. The model is also set up to identify which scenarios are most harmful to the climate and which are most detrimental to .

"Many studies use models of single systems," Bond said. "For example, trucks on roads, or how people use different goods as the economy grows, or how cities spread as their population increases. These systems all affect each other, so we had to connect them and see how they worked together."

A carbon tax, which places a value on greenhouse gases emitted, could entice shippers to switch to more efficient rail transport. The models indicate this could lead to a 24 percent reduction in over business as usual, the greatest reduction of all scenarios modeled, the study reports.

The researchers found that enforcing truck fleet maintenance was an effective way to reduce particulate emissions, cutting the projected mortality rate by about one-third by 2050. The number of misfit, poorly maintained trucks on the road is uncertain, but that attention to overall performance is an important factor in maintaining health, Bond said. The researchers also examined the effect of changing population density in cities.

According to the study, increasing urban compactness could reduce freight activity but increase human exposure to particulate pollution. This scenario offers a slight improvement in health benefits over the current urban sprawl trend. However, the answer is not as easy as simply enforcing new environmental policies, Bond said.

"Yes, environmental policy changes could push us toward cleaner, more efficient modes of land transport or more urban compactness, but we have to think ahead and start building up the infrastructure that supports those changes now," she said. "For example, when petroleum prices spiked about 10 years ago, shippers wanted to switch from trucks to rail, but the capacity was really insufficient."

Bond said there are still many scenarios to explore with the , including the effects of declining or improved infrastructure and increased traffic congestion. "Our allows for a lot of flexibility, and this type of 'system of systems' approach should be routine when investigating policy change," she said.

Explore further: Emissions targets for transport sector can't be met using natural gas alone

More information: Liang Liu et al, Health and climate impacts of future United States land freight modelled with global-to-urban models, Nature Sustainability (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0224-3

Related Stories

Four ways our cities can cut transport emissions

November 26, 2018

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently warned that global warming could reach 1.5℃ as early as 2030. The landmark report by leading scientists urged nations to do more to avert an impending crisis.

Recommended for you

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

luke_w_bradley
not rated yet Feb 11, 2019
There needs to be more academic literature on logistics, people often talk about reforms with no clue. First thing, we'll tuned semi moves 20 tons on 6mpg, coming out to average 1 ton 140 miles on 1 gallon. (140 TMPG) Average car moves 1.2 riders weighing about 0.1 ton with 30mpg, so 1 ton 3 miles on a gallon (3 TMPG) so cars are doing way less efficient than trucks/buses at transporting mass. Trains are even better, but large transport is most efficient... Second thing, there is very little overlap between trains and trucks and what they can do, it's about the same as trains and ships. Drive behind your grocery store, is there a shipping port or train stop? Third, trains and cars don't play nice with urban planning, so role of trains is unlikely to grow. Smart on seeking well tuned trucks though, simple things like idle management and good bunk heaters save fleets loads of money and help environment.
luke_w_bradley
not rated yet Feb 11, 2019
There needs to be more academic literature on logistics, people often talk about reforms with no clue. First thing, we'll tuned semi moves 20 tons on 6mpg, coming out to average 1 ton 140 miles on 1 gallon. (140 TMPG) Average car moves 1.2 riders weighing about 0.1 ton with 30mpg, so 1 ton 3 miles on a gallon (3 TMPG) so cars are doing way less efficient than trucks/buses at transporting mass. Trains are even better, but large transport is most efficient... Second thing, there is very little overlap between trains and trucks and what they can do, it's about the same as trains and ships. Drive behind your grocery store, is there a shipping port or train stop? Third, trains and cars don't play nice with urban planning, so role of trains is unlikely to grow. Smart on seeking well tuned trucks though, simple things like idle management and good bunk heaters save fleets loads of money and help environment.
luke_w_bradley
not rated yet Feb 11, 2019
There needs to be more academic literature on logistics, people often talk about reforms with no clue. First thing, we'll tuned semi moves 20 tons on 6mpg, coming out to average 1 ton 140 miles on 1 gallon. (140 TMPG) Average car moves 1.2 riders weighing about 0.1 ton with 30mpg, so 1 ton 3 miles on a gallon (3 TMPG) so cars are doing way less efficient than trucks/buses at transporting mass. Trains are even better, but large transport is most efficient... Second thing, there is very little overlap between trains and trucks and what they can do, it's about the same as trains and ships. Drive behind your grocery store, is there a shipping port or train stop? Third, trains and cars don't play nice with urban planning, so role of trains is unlikely to grow. Smart on seeking well tuned trucks though, simple things like idle management and good bunk heaters save fleets loads of money and help environment.
luke_w_bradley
not rated yet Feb 11, 2019
Whoops, flood control didn't work there. Meant to say 7 mpg for truck too.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.