Scientists reveal for first time the exact process by which chaotic systems synchronize

January 7, 2019, Bar-Ilan University
These shapes of donuts are the global structures of the Rossler system (named Rossler attractors). The colored points are the local synchronizations that emerged between the systems in different coupling strengths. Credit: Nir Lahav

Synchronization, in which two different systems oscillate in an identical way, underlies numerous collective phenomena observed in nature, providing an example for emergent behaviors ranging from the acoustic unison of cricket choruses to the behavior of the human brain.

Can chaotic systems also synchronize with each other? How do synchronization and self-organization emerge from systems that didn't have these properties to begin with? Characterizing and understanding the transition from disorder to synchrony is of fundamental importance to understanding the emergence of synchronization and self-organization in nature.

In a new study published in Physical Review E, physicists from Bar-Ilan University in Israel, along with colleagues from Spain, India and Italy, analyzed the Rossler system, a well-known which physicists have studied thoroughly for almost 40 years. Looking at this system from a fresh perspective, they discovered new phenomena that have been overlooked until now.

For the first time the researchers were able to measure the fine grain process that leads from disorder to synchrony, discovering a new kind of synchronization between chaotic systems. They call this new phenomenon Topological Synchronization. Traditionally, synchronization has been examined by comparing the time-course of activity of the two systems. Topological Synchronization instead examines synchronization by comparing the structures of the systems. The chaotic system is therefore examined at the level of its structure, taking a more global approach to determine the process of synchronization.

"Chaotic systems, although unpredictable, still have a subtle global organization called strange attractor," says Nir Lahav, of Bar-Ilan University's Department of Physics, the study's lead author. "Every chaotic system attracts its own unique strange attractor. By Topological Synchronization we mean that two strange attractors have the same organization and structures. At the beginning of the synchronization process, small areas on one strange attractor have the same structure of the other attractor, meaning that they are already synced to the other attractor. At the end of the process, all the areas of one strange attractor will have the of the other and complete Topological Synchronization has been reached."

The discovery of Topological Synchronization reveals that, in contrast to what was previously assumed, chaotic systems synchronize gradually through local structures that, surprisingly, kick off in the sparse areas of the system and only then spread to the more populated areas. In these sparse areas the activity is less chaotic than in other areas and, as a result, it is easier for these areas to sync relative to those that are much more erratic.

"In order to understand why this is surprising, think of this scenario: two groups of friends meet at a party. In every group we can find extroverts, who easily connect with strangers, and introverts, who find it harder to connect with a new group," explains Lahav. "We would assume that the first connections would occur between the extroverts and only later would the introverts create connections. It would be very surprising to see this happen the other way around. But this is exactly what we found in our results. We assumed that the dense areas of the system, where most of the activity is, would sync with each other first (like the extroverts), but in reality we discovered that the low-density areas were the first to sync (the introverts)."

This conceptual novelty pertains not only to our fundamental understanding of synchronization, but also carries direct practical implications on the predictability limits of chaotic systems. Indeed, thanks to this newly-defined local synchronization, the researchers show that the state of one system can be inferred from measurements of the other, even in the absence of global synchrony. We can predict where synchronized areas will appear in week coupling, much before complete .

The researchers are currently applying their findings to try to uncover how may emerge in other complex systems in nature such as the human brain.

Explore further: How function may abruptly emerge or disappear in physical and biological systems

More information: Nir Lahav et al, Synchronization of chaotic systems: A microscopic description, Physical Review E (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.052204

Related Stories

Get in synch -- or be enslaved by it

October 19, 2010

We talk about synchronization a lot. We synch up; synch our computers; and get in synch. And synchronous behavior underlies many natural systems, events and phenomena.

The brain can be trained to avoid dyslexia

March 8, 2018

The ability of the brain to synchronize with the tone and intonation of speech influences how language is processed. This is the conclusion of a study by the Basque research center BCBL. The results could contribute to more ...

Recommended for you

New thermoelectric material delivers record performance

January 17, 2019

Taking advantage of recent advances in using theoretical calculations to predict the properties of new materials, researchers reported Thursday the discovery of a new class of half-Heusler thermoelectric compounds, including ...

Zirconium isotope a master at neutron capture

January 17, 2019

The probability that a nucleus will absorb a neutron is important to many areas of nuclear science, including the production of elements in the cosmos, reactor performance, nuclear medicine and defense applications.

Mechanism helps explain the ear's exquisite sensitivity

January 16, 2019

The human ear, like those of other mammals, is so extraordinarily sensitive that it can detect sound-wave-induced vibrations of the eardrum that move by less than the width of an atom. Now, researchers at MIT have discovered ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2019
Multi system integration/synchronization is crucial to understanding all other existing processes.
I applaud these guy's work...
Phyllis Harmonic
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2019
Multiple eigenstates, if allowed to interact, can resolve to a single eigenstate as they initially compete, then cooperate for available resources. Well done, indeed!
Eli Levine
not rated yet Jan 10, 2019
This could also explain transitions in social systems, as those outside the system work to effect change in the system from smaller scales up to higher ones. Those inside the system cannot do it immediately because they are snared by the perspectives and incentives of the system to maintain the existing social system. Only people outside the system can bring about the initial changes, because they aren't biased by the status quo. Transitions then must be done carefully, over enough time for people to adopt, adapt, and learn to trust them, and lead to some real tangible benefits for people, if not end up being supported by the majority of people through a mixture of imposition and consent. Think of the transitions in Europe from paganism to Christianity as an example, or from feudalism to capitalism to what will likely be a kind of socialism as we enter the Anthropocene, and become forced to effectively challenge inequality and environmental degradation.
not rated yet Jan 14, 2019
Sorry, but I got very little of an explanation on the novelty or the nuance of this discovery, and some of it seems at least on the surface contradictory. In the video, he first says that they start from a global view, not a local view, hence the title "Topological." But then they end by saying they're looking at local events. I'm not at all saying that they didn't discover anything, only that their explanation doesn't seem to be directed at the key elements of the discovery, only the overall results and their importance. The graphs and diagrams, again, are only the results, and not explanations on how they got the results. Also, I think it's very easy to extrapolate to the possibility that this research can have meaning towards how the brain works, but please, any study of the butterfly effect or of synchronization, complexity, etc. can be hoped for such an insight, and so I'm not sure such a statement is just a flippant attempt for attention.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.