Canada's CHIME telescope detects second repeating fast radio burst

Canada's CHIME telescope detects second repeating fast radio burst
The CHIME telescope incorporates four 100-metre long U-shaped cylinders of metal mesh that resemble snowboard half-pipes, with total area equivalent to five hockey rinks. CHIME reconstructs the image of the overhead sky by processing the radio signals recorded by thousands of antennas. Its signal processing system is the largest of any telescope on Earth, allowing it to search huge regions of the sky simultaneously. Credit: CHIME

A Canadian-led team of scientists has found the second repeating fast radio burst (FRB) ever recorded. FRBs are short bursts of radio waves coming from far outside our Milky Way galaxy. Scientists believe FRBs emanate from powerful astrophysical phenomena billions of light years away.

The discovery of the extragalactic signal is among the first, eagerly awaited results from the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME), a revolutionary radio telescope inaugurated in late 2017 by a collaboration of scientists from the University of British Columbia, McGill University, University of Toronto, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, and the National Research Council of Canada.

In a resounding endorsement of the novel telescope's capabilities, the repeating FRB was one of a total of 13 bursts detected over a period of just three weeks during the summer of 2018, while CHIME was in its pre-commissioning phase and running at only a fraction of its full capacity. Additional bursts from the repeating FRB were detected in following weeks by the telescope, which is located in British Columbia's Okanagan Valley.

Discovery of second repeating FRB suggests more exist

Of the more than 60 FRBs observed to date, repeating bursts from a single source had been found only once before—a discovery made by the Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico in 2015.

"Until now, there was only one known repeating FRB. Knowing that there is another suggests that there could be more out there. And with more repeaters and more sources available for study, we may be able to understand these cosmic puzzles—where they're from and what causes them," said Ingrid Stairs, a member of the CHIME team and an astrophysicist at UBC.

Before CHIME began to gather data, some scientists wondered if the range of radio frequencies the telescope had been designed to detect would be too low to pick up fast radio bursts. Most of the FRBs previously detected had been found at frequencies near 1400 MHz, well above the Canadian telescope's range of 400 MHz to 800 MHz.

The CHIME team's results—published January 9 in two papers in Nature and presented the same day at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Seattle—settled these doubts, with the majority of the 13 bursts being recorded well down to the lowest frequencies in CHIME's range. In some of the 13 cases, the signal at the lower end of the band was so bright that it seems likely other FRBs will be detected at frequencies even lower than CHIME's minimum of 400 MHz.

FRB sources likely to be in 'special places' within galaxies

The majority of the 13 FRBs detected showed signs of "scattering," a phenomenon that reveals information about the environment surrounding a source of radio waves. The amount of scattering observed by the CHIME team led them to conclude that the sources of FRBs are powerful astrophysical objects more likely to be in locations with special characteristics.

"That could mean in some sort of dense clump like a supernova remnant," says team member Cherry Ng, an astronomer at the University of Toronto. "Or near the central black hole in a galaxy. But it has to be in some special place to give us all the scattering that we see."

A new clue to the puzzle

Ever since FRBs were first detected, scientists have been piecing together the signals' observed characteristics to come up with models that might explain the sources of the mysterious bursts and provide some idea of the environments in which they occur. The detection by CHIME of FRBs at lower frequencies means some of these theories will need to be reconsidered.

"Whatever the source of these radio waves is, it's interesting to see how wide a range of frequencies it can produce. There are some models where intrinsically the source can't produce anything below a certain ," says team member Arun Naidu of McGill University.

"[We now know] the sources can produce low-frequency waves and those low-frequency waves can escape their environment, and are not too scattered to be detected by the time they reach the Earth. That tells us something about the environments and the sources. We haven't solved the problem, but it's several more pieces in the puzzle," says Tom Landecker, a CHIME team member from the National Research Council of Canada.


Explore further

New Canadian radio telescope is detecting fast radio bursts

More information: Observations of fast radio bursts at frequencies down to 400 megahertz, Nature (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0867-7

undefined undefined. A second source of repeating fast radio bursts, Nature (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0864-x

Journal information: Nature

Provided by McGill University
Citation: Canada's CHIME telescope detects second repeating fast radio burst (2019, January 9) retrieved 23 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-01-canada-chime-telescope-fast-radio.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
269 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 10, 2019
Good to see results like these coming from the newly-commissioned CHIME observatory. As more of the other new radio observatories come on line, more will be learnt of FRBs. See, e.g. results from the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) telescope published in October 2018:

https://www.icrar...ures.pdf

Some background on dispersion measure and scattering exhibited by FRB signals can be gleaned from this paper published in 2013: https://arxiv.org...1628.pdf

Go radio astronomy!

Jan 10, 2019
And some background on radio astronomy.

People are used to seeing giant parabolic antennae or reading about satellites. This is good for concentrating on a source, but it's not so good for finding sources. A wide field telescope like this one can scan a significant fraction of the sky, and if we had just a few more we'd be able to see the radio sky everywhere all the time.

Not only congratulations for this discovery, but for inventing a new tool for radio astronomy, to this Canadian team.

Hopefully the next one will be in Australia, and ones after that in Europe and South America and the Indian Ocean and Africa. That should give full coverage which is important for these transient events, and confirmation from multiple sources which is important for science.

Jan 10, 2019
People are used to seeing giant parabolic antennae
I can remember the bewilderment of many people when they learned of the wood-and-wire antenna array set up in a field by Antony Hewish and used in the discovery of pulsars. "How could that thing be a radio telescope?"...
congratulations for this discovery, but for inventing a new tool for radio astronomy, to this Canadian team
Yes, kudos to the Canadians for designing and implementing CHIME.

Jan 11, 2019
I can remember the bewilderment of many people when they learned of the wood-and-wire antenna array . . .


Nowadays, you can build a radio-scope without a huge investment. A reasonably good SDR, an LNB or two, and a simple wire antenna are easily had. And there's free software for analyzing signals and displaying results. Plus, you can "gaze" even when it's cloudy! There's a robust amateur radio astronomy community, too: http://www.radio-...-started

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more