Responsible innovation key to smart farming

December 20, 2018, University of East Anglia

Responsible innovation that considers the wider impacts on society is key to smart farming, according to academics at the University of East Anglia (UEA).

Agriculture is undergoing a supported by policy-makers around the world. While smart technologies will play an important role in achieving improved productivity and greater eco-efficiency, critics have suggested that consideration of the social impacts is being side-lined.

In a new journal article Dr. David Rose and Dr. Jason Chilvers, from UEA's School of Environmental Sciences, argue that the concept of should underpin the so-called fourth , ensuring that innovations also provide social benefits and address potentially negative side-effects.

Each of the previous revolutions was radical at the time—the first representing a transition from hunting and gathering to settled agriculture, the second relating to the British Agricultural Revolution in the 18th century, and the third to post-war productivity increases associated with mechanisation and the Green Revolution in the developing world.

The current 'agri-tech' developments come at a time when the UK government has provided £90 million of public money to transform food production in order to be at the forefront of global advanced sustainable agriculture. Many other countries are also prioritising smart agri-tech.

This, combined with from organisations including IBM, Barclays, and Microsoft, means that 'Agriculture 4.0' is underway, with technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics increasingly being used in farming.

Dr. Rose, a lecturer in human geography, said: "All of these emergent technologies have uses in farming and may provide many benefits. For example, robotics could plug potential lost labour post-Brexit in industries such as fruit picking, while robotics and AI could enable better chemical application, saving farmers money and protecting the environment. They could also attract new, younger farmers to an ageing industry."

Writing in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Dr. Rose and Dr. Chilvers warn though that agri-tech could also have side-effects, bringing potential environmental, ethical, and social costs.

"In light of controversial agri-tech precedents, it is beyond doubt that smart farming is going to cause similar controversy. Robotics and AI could cause job losses or change the nature of farming in ways that are undesirable to some farmers. Others might be left behind by technological advancement, while wider society might not like how food is being produced," said Dr. Rose.

"We therefore encourage policy-makers, funders, technology companies and researchers to consider the views of both farming communities and wider society. We advocate that this new agricultural tech , particularly the areas funded by , should be responsible, considering the winners, but particularly the potential losers of change.

Dr. Rose added: "This means better ways, both formal and informal, to include farmers and the public in decision-making, as well as advisors and other key stakeholders sharing their views. Wider society should be able to change the direction of travel, and ask whether we want to go there. They should be able to question and contest whether benefits to productivity should supersede social, ethical, or environmental concerns, and be able to convince innovators to change design processes.

"Responsible innovation frameworks should be tested in practice to see if they can make tech more responsible. More responsible tech saves controversy, such as that surrounding genetic modification, ensures farmers and the public are behind it, and can help to deliver on the policy objectives."

Explore further: The battle for the future of farming: What you need to know

More information: 'Agriculture 4.0: Broadening responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming', David Rose, Jason Chilvers, is published in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087

Related Stories

The battle for the future of farming: What you need to know

November 21, 2018

It is widely agreed that today's global agriculture system is a social and environmental failure. Business as usual is no longer an option: biodiversity loss and nitrogen pollution are exceeding planetary limits, and catastrophic ...

Better chocolate with mobile technology

November 8, 2018

Smart farming uses technology to access real-time information on crop yields and soil-mapping, fertiliser application, weather data, and intelligent assessment and so improve agricultural efficiency and crop yields. However, ...

Showcasing the cutting edge of new agri-food technology

November 13, 2015

Robotic harvesting of vegetables, automated weeding techniques and the use of sensitive disease detection software were among the innovative technologies showcased at the UK's National Centre for Food Manufacturing as part ...

Climate-smart agriculture requires radical policy changes

December 13, 2017

At all levels of agricultural regulation – national, European, and international – important changes are required to be able to address the challenges of climate change. Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is crucial, on ...

Recommended for you

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

socean
not rated yet Dec 20, 2018
We don't need more traditional centralized ag that survives by externalizing costs and getting subsidies to do it. We need millions of small, highly automated, decentralized, near-to-table, food sources. E.g. all the parking garages and extra road spaces that will be available once robotic ground and air vehicles are commonplace. The traditional family farm, except for boutique growers using soil for the fun of it, is doomed. Mega farms with tractors, harvesters, combines, polluting feed lots, migrant workers ( virtual slaves ) et al. ... doomed.

Calls to limit disruption by preserving old models ( even partially ) underestimate the storm of change barreling down on humanity. We need new social models and structures.

It is now very, very difficult to imagine the future. So the process of creating a shared vision needs to be practiced continuously, as disruptions will accelerate. These days any realistic vision needs to anticipate constant massive change.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.